Fortinet FortiSandbox and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform are key players in the cybersecurity industry. While FortiSandbox has an upper hand in seamless integration within its own ecosystem, ThreatLocker excels in zero trust application control and ease of deployment.
Features: Fortinet FortiSandbox offers advanced threat detection, AI, and manual scanning, providing a highly customizable solution. It integrates seamlessly within the Fortinet ecosystem, boosting security against threats like ransomware. In contrast, ThreatLocker focuses on its comprehensive application control, implementing a zero trust approach with allowlisting and real-time threat intelligence, which helps mitigate unauthorized software risks.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiSandbox could benefit from better integration with third-party tools, enhanced support for Mac and Linux, and a more user-friendly licensing structure. ThreatLocker should focus on integrating identity and multi-factor authentication, refining its learning mode, and exploring deeper device deployment strategies.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiSandbox's deployment can be complex due to varied on-premises and hybrid configurations, with mixed reviews on customer support. ThreatLocker offers straightforward and flexible deployment options, with strong customer support known for accessibility and prompt assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiSandbox presents a complex pricing structure due to various licensing types but offers competitive pricing, justifying its ROI by preventing costly security breaches. ThreatLocker provides a transparent pricing model, including onboarding costs, offering a practical entry into cybersecurity management with significant long-term value. Both platforms deliver clear ROI through effective risk reduction.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
Based on what we use ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform for with the same functionalities and packaging, it was around 13 or 14 hours.
We have the MDR package as well, and just knowing someone is watching those endpoints at 3:00 a.m. is a lifesaver that you cannot put a dollar figure on.
Sometimes the technical engineer is very good and helpful, and sometimes we go through many processes until it gets escalated to a higher level or to another advanced technical engineer.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform scales very smoothly with our growing needs.
Fortinet FortiSandbox works fine, is easy to manage, and functions well.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
I think Fortinet FortiSandbox could introduce more automation tools and AI tools.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform could improve by being a little more hands-off, perhaps by having a team inside ThreatLocker that does all the vetting of patches; having one person hired by ThreatLocker to check out patches means that a million other industries using ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform do not have to vet the same patch, ultimately saving time and money around the world.
This feedback would help us understand what is learned in real-time, especially during a one-hour learning mode setup, ensuring we remain aware of potentially unnecessary learned items.
The cost is in the mid-range.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
Money is saved because it is not costly, and I would suggest it for other companies.
The smooth integrations between Fortinet FortiSandbox and other Fortinet solutions such as FortiWeb and FortiFirewall and with other Fortinet environments are what I really appreciate.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Fortinet FortiSandbox | 5.3% |
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 2.6% |
| Other | 92.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 51 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Fortinet FortiSandbox is a behavior-based threat detection solution that prevents and detects malicious code in files transferred within the organization. It is integrated with FortiGate firewalls and FortiMail for threat protection and can be used for monitoring and reporting. The solution inspects files in a virtual environment with different types of virtual machines and can block or quarantine files based on their score.
The most valuable features include dynamic behavior analysis, manual scan features, easy management and configuration, fast scanning, scalability, customization, and ICAP protocol. The solution is cost-effective and faster than other sandbox solutions, with a good user interface.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform employs a deny-by-default approach to enhance security and operational efficiency, focusing on precise application control and streamlined access management without administrative rights.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers advanced application control, allowlisting, and elevation control, significantly reducing unauthorized software activities. Its granular controls improve security, while ringfencing enhances application monitoring. Elevation requests allow users to gain administrative access without IT intervention. The platform's ease of policy management and real-time threat visibility contribute to reduced help desk tickets and operational costs, ensuring protection against ransomware and unauthorized applications.
What are the key features of ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform?Organizations often deploy ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform for ensuring endpoint security in industries requiring stringent application control and administrative access management. Its functionalities are critical for managing Shadow IT, creating policies, and overseeing software installation approvals. Common usage spans sectors demanding robust security and compliance, such as finance and healthcare, where maintaining high security and efficiency is crucial.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
