No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FortiSASE vs Fortinet FortiCASB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiCASB
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (20th)
FortiSASE
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Fortinet FortiCASB is designed for Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
FortiSASE, on the other hand, focuses on Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), holds 5.4% mindshare, down 7.5% since last year.
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiCASB0.6%
Netskope13.4%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks12.6%
Other73.4%
Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
FortiSASE5.4%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks10.1%
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform8.9%
Other75.6%
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
 

Featured Reviews

VY
Delivery Head - NOC Operations at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Seamlessly customize security features but need improved deployment speed
I find Fortinet FortiCASB easily customizable. It allows me to leverage features that cover almost eighty percent of use cases required by my clients. The compliance management feature supports GDPR and HIPAA compliance, effectively meeting those use cases. The hybrid model of Fortinet offers seamless deployment on cloud or hybrid best suited for customers, making it adaptable in various scenarios.
WY Lim - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at CTC Global Sdn Bhd
Unified cloud security has protected branches and remote users but needs broader integrations
I do not often communicate with the technical support of FortiSASE. I definitely use documentation officially provided by Fortinet for FortiSASE. My impression of this documentation is that it is quite similar and standard compared to other major security vendors such as Cisco or Palo Alto. At a high level, they deliver the intended information, but I still need their representatives, particularly sales engineers, to provide detailed explanations, as the documentation may not cover every area that all audiences might be looking for. I have no comment on whether the documentation should be improved to add more details, because if too many things are added to a white paper or data sheet, it can become messy. I am satisfied with the current arrangement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I find Fortinet FortiCASB easily customizable."
"The product can scale."
"It's very stable."
"FortiSASE can operate in a cloud environment with client certificates for authorizations and access control using features like PostCheck."
"Overall, I'd rate the product eight out of ten."
"This advantage is having the ability to create an SPA unit of FortiGate."
"The solution is scalable, it is highly scalable."
"It has AI-based detections for any signature-less virus or any unknown vulnerabilities."
"The best feature of FortiSASE is SD-WAN."
 

Cons

"The turnaround time to deploy Fortinet FortiCASB could be improved. The learning curve for deploying, configuring use cases, and rules can be better."
"FortiSASE implementation is too complex where other products take two to three months or maximum four months to implement, FortiSASE took more than double that time."
"Some of the solution's back-end connectivity and visibility are not robust and could be improved."
"The GUI and connectivity, along with the support offered, are some of the areas of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"The product is expensive."
"They need to have more concise or precise ways to come up with the return on investment for convincing or presenting this to customers."
"While stability is generally good, we faced some difficulties during updates."
"There are some issues at the agent level, and then we have to sign out and sign in."
"The current high-tech version of FortiSASE is not recommended due to its heavy loading."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I can only speak about the pricing for education users because we get discounts. Other users aren't going to get the same price, but FortiSASE is competitive with the other products out there. All the solutions came in at the same price, so it just came down to the product that works best for us."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."
"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."
"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) solutions are best for your needs.
909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiCASB?
The price point could be better, and improvements are desired in staying on top of evolving threats while keeping cost and processing power in mind.
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiCASB?
The turnaround time to deploy Fortinet FortiCASB could be improved. The learning curve for deploying, configuring use cases, and rules can be better. I believe that the price point could be improve...
What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiCASB?
My primary use case for Fortinet FortiCASB is threat management and managing external threats. I predominantly use it where threat management is a priority.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiSASE ?
The pricing, licensing, and setup costs of FortiSASE are very advantageous if you are already a Fortinet customer. If you have FortiGate, the Fortinet firewall, it will be a very good solution for ...
What needs improvement with FortiSASE ?
I think Fortinet can improve FortiSASE in two main areas: one is enhancing the Secure Web Gateway module, and the second is providing more advanced data classification options since the current DLP...
What is your primary use case for FortiSASE ?
I would describe the use case for FortiSASE as replacing traditional SSL VPN with ZTNA, which enhances Zero Trust Network accessibility for users in any remote location. For example, a user in Indi...
 

Also Known As

FortiCASB
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rollins
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Cisco, Netskope and others in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB). Updated: July 2026.
909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.