Forcepoint ZTNA vs Portnox comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Forcepoint and Portnox Security are both solutions in the ZTNA category. Forcepoint is ranked #25, while Portnox Security is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4. Forcepoint holds a 1.2% mindshare in Z, compared to Portnox Security’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Portnox Security users who would recommend it.

Forcepoint ZTNA

Read 1 Forcepoint ZTNA review

973 Views
934 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Read 41 Portnox reviews

7,341 Views
2,349 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Forcepoint ZTNA

Portnox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Portnox and Forcepoint ZTNA are competing products in the network security and Zero Trust Network Access space. Portnox often receives more favorable comments on its pricing and support, while Forcepoint ZTNA is perceived as offering a more robust feature set, suggesting the cost is justified by its capabilities.

Features: Portnox offers excellent NAC capabilities focusing on simplicity, flexibility in network access management, and seamless integration with network devices. It prioritizes runtime threat detection and compliance management. Forcepoint ZTNA provides comprehensive security through granular access controls and advanced data protection layers, integrating seamlessly across cloud environments. The primary difference is Portnox's focus on ease of access control versus Forcepoint's deeper security framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox is known for easy implementation, straightforward operations, and strong technical support. Conversely, Forcepoint ZTNA offers a robust deployment model that can be complex due to its extensive feature set, requiring more technical insight.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox generally provides a more appealing pricing model with transparent packages, resulting in a favorable cost-to-benefit ratio. In contrast, Forcepoint ZTNA, while having a higher upfront cost, presents considerable value through extensive security offerings, indicating sound ROI for businesses needing comprehensive security.

To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint ZTNA

Ranking in ZTNA

25th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Portnox

Ranking in ZTNA

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (3rd), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of Forcepoint ZTNA is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portnox is 3.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ZTNA Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Portnox	3.1%
Forcepoint ZTNA	1.2%
Other	95.7%

ZTNA

Featured Reviews

AbhijeethReetoo

Business Development Management at a computer retailer with 501-1,000 employees

You can add multiple features on a single agent, but it's an expensive product, and its marketing approach should be more aggressive

Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA because a distributor like me still needs to promote it more to customers. Forcepoint has to capitalize on, focus on, or highlight its overall approaches to Forcepoint ZTNA marketing, such as SASE or SSE, to sell the whole bundle rather than as a standalone product. Today, most customers move to the cloud, so the whole SSE or SASE approach makes better sense. Forcepoint needs to look at the whole picture. I suggest being more aggressive in marketing to boost customer awareness of Forcepoint ZTNA.

Read full review

Maurice Mwaura

Product Manager at Applied Principles Limited

Unified access control has improved compliance visibility and simplified passwordless access

There is work to be done when it comes to making the solution more seamless. For example, when a user is denied access, they would need a way to maybe self-resolve themselves, perhaps a way to generate a ticket on their own, something around resolutions. When it comes to users using the product, that is where good products are differentiated from products that are a bit of a challenge. Portnox has much to do in terms of their reporting. The generated reports need improvement. Things that other tools would say are normal are usually not present. For example, there is a page called NAS devices or NAS network that is able to show the switches that have been managed. Currently, there is no way of generating an easy report or an easy way of just generating something to tell the customer what they have been able to achieve so far. This is not done yet and is still very manual. I think there is work to be done there. More integrations around the various products being used would be beneficial. So far I have not encountered any major challenge. Where there was a challenge, I think support came in and helped us resolve. In fact, most of the challenges are not with the product; they are with the customer environment. I think that is just to update their documentation where they have come across a new vendor for easier integrations in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about Forcepoint ZTNA is that you could use it as a starting point because you have one agent that allows you to add more features. Other technologies require one agent per solution, so you'll end up with multiple agents."

"It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components."

"For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."

"Portnox saves me about fifty percent of my time."

"The most important of all is that we are aware of situations the minute anyone on the network has issues, with a very good graphical interface that shows us exactly where the issue is and what ports it is occurring at, making it a lot easier for us to troubleshoot network issues and helping with uptime and productivity."

"Portnox has positively impacted my organization by improving visibility into connected devices, strengthening access control through zero trust policies, and automating compliance enforcement."

"Portnox ensures system compliance through policy enforcement, including antivirus updates, Windows operating system updates, and system patches, helping network administrators maintain system health and security across the network."

"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."

"The cloud-based feature of Portnox is excellent."

More Portnox pros

Cons

"Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA because a distributor like me still needs to promote it more to customers."

"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."

"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"One thing they can look at is increasing the number of support staff so that there will be more people supporting the solution than they currently have."

"On the performance side, we have occasionally run into some random RADIUS timeouts and weird intermittent Wi-Fi authentication delays."

"It can't work fully redundant."

"However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes."

"We have seen instances where the older version stops working properly, and we have to update each system individually."

More Portnox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Ninety percent of the feedback I received from company partners is that Forcepoint ZTNA is an expensive product."

"The cost of Portnox Clear is reasonable."

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox Clear?

The pricing and setup cost as well as licensing is a bit high compared to the competition. If it were better, we could also have some pricing specific or special discounts to cater for SMBs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox Clear?

If the MSSP offering could be the primary push or primary concern, it would be the best thing that could happen. Based on the Tanzanian market, AI governance is something that is coming through. Fo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Portnox Clear?

Portnox is for the network access control use case. The use case focuses on wired network access, specifically how users are connecting to the network and how we are checking their security posture...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 83% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 7% of the time

More Forcepoint ZTNA Competitors

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 9% of the time

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) vs Portnox

Compared 8% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 6% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

October 2026

Download Forcepoint ZTNA product report

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

October 2026

Download Portnox product report

Also Known As

No data available

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Forcepoint

Portnox Security

Overview

Forcepoint ZTNA delivers comprehensive scalable zero trust architecture, effectively managing secure access for remote and mobile workforces by verifying identity at each access point.

Forcepoint ZTNA offers user-friendly integration and seamless zero trust implementation by prioritizing secure connectivity. It refines how modern businesses control network access, addressing security challenges faced by decentralized working environments. By combining identity verification and context analysis, the platform ensures that access is only granted under defined conditions, significantly reducing potential attack vectors.

What are Forcepoint ZTNA's key features?

Granular Access Control: Tailors access based on user identity and context.
Identity-based Security: Manages permissions with precision using identity verification.
Seamless Integration: Eases deployment within existing IT infrastructures.
Real-time Monitoring: Provides continuous threat assessment and response.
Scalability: Adapts to fluctuating demands and various user counts.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from reviews?

Enhanced Security: Defined access minimizing unauthorized entry.
Agility: Improved reaction to workload changes without compromising security.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces need for expensive hardware upgrades.
User Satisfaction: Intuitive controls leading to ease of use.

Forcepoint ZTNA sees diverse implementations, notably in healthcare, where privacy and security safeguards are vital, and in finance, securing sensitive transactions and data exchanges. Its adaptability meets strict industry regulations, making it highly suited to environments with stringent security demands.

Forcepoint

Portnox NAC is a cloud-native network access control solution built for today's hybrid, distributed enterprises. Get real-time visibility into every device on your network, enforce risk-based access policies automatically, and maintain continuous compliance — all without deploying a single on-premises appliance.

----------

About Portnox Security

Portnox is a cloud-native enterprise access control provider that helps organizations secure every identity - human and non-human - across networks, applications, and infrastructure. As identities, devices, and workloads multiply across modern environments, Portnox enables continuous access verification based on identity context, device posture, and risk signals. Its unified platform brings together passwordless authentication, access control, continuous policy enforcement, and automated response through a single policy engine.

Portnox gives security and IT teams real-time visibility into everything connecting and the ability to quickly restrict, quarantine, or revoke non-compliant access. Today, Portnox actively manages more than one million devices worldwide, secures 40 million authentication sessions, and blocks over one million unauthorized access attempts every day. Learn more at portnox.com.

CAPABILITIES:

• Discover and assess users, devices, and identities connecting to corporate resources

• Unify continuous zero trust access control on networks, applications, and infrastructure

• Enforce identity- and context-aware access policies

• Enable secure remote work without complexity

• Deliver passwordless authentication, device posture checks, and continuous access enforcement

• Control administrative access to routers, switches, firewalls, and other network devices

• Improve audit readiness with visibility, access logs, and policy-based compliance controls

BUILT FOR:

Portnox is designed for distributed organizations that need to manage access across employees, contractors, service accounts, managed devices, unmanaged devices, IoT, network infrastructure, SaaS applications, private applications, and AI agents. The platform helps reduce reliance on on-premises appliances, legacy VPNs, and fragmented access tools by centralizing access policy enforcement from a single cloud-native policy engine.

INTEGRATIONS:

Portnox integrates with the tools you already use (including Azure AD / Entra ID, Okta) and works with your existing network appliances, (such as Meraki, Fortinet, and more), and many other identity and network infrastructure tools.

Portnox Security

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sallie Mae, Roku, Vuori, Legal Zoom, Anaplan, Aecon, H.I.G. Capital, McLaren Construction Group, PFCU, UK Mortgage Lending Limited, CCC Intelligent Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Fortinet, Cisco and others in ZTNA. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.