Forcepoint CASB vs iboss comparison

Read 24 iboss reviews

9,641 Views
3,953 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Forcepoint CASB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

iboss and Forcepoint CASB are competing in the cloud access security broker market. iboss leads in deployment flexibility and customer service, while Forcepoint CASB is stronger in feature comprehensiveness, appealing to those seeking advanced security features.

Features: iboss offers a cloud-native architecture that integrates seamlessly, providing scalability ideal for enterprises needing flexibility. It has robust threat detection, focusing on real-time monitoring and advanced malware protection. Forcepoint CASB excels in monitoring user activity and data loss prevention, with strong policy enforcement. It provides comprehensive analytics tools, appealing to enterprises emphasizing security insights.

Room for Improvement: iboss could improve by expanding its feature offerings beyond scalability and malware protection, enhancing policy customization options, and providing more in-depth reporting tools. Forcepoint CASB might benefit from streamlining its deployment process for quicker setup, enhancing its user interface for easier management, and reducing complexity in its feature settings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: iboss offers straightforward deployment with a cloud-based infrastructure that minimizes setup time, supported by responsive customer service for swift resolutions. Forcepoint CASB requires more initial setup effort but offers extensive integration with existing IT environments, providing long-term advantages. Its comprehensive onboarding process can be beneficial for organizations needing detailed guidance.

Pricing and ROI: iboss is cost-efficient with quick ROI due to faster deployment. Forcepoint CASB entails a higher initial setup cost, but its feature richness offers robust long-term ROI. While iboss is initially more budget-friendly, Forcepoint CASB is appealing to those investing in comprehensive security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint CASB vs. iboss Report (Updated: September 2026).

Forcepoint CASB vs. iboss

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint CASB

Ranking in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

18th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

iboss

Ranking in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Internet Security (3rd), Web Content Filtering (1st), ZTNA as a Service (6th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) category, the mindshare of Forcepoint CASB is 1.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of iboss is 4.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
iboss	4.5%
Forcepoint CASB	1.7%
Other	93.8%

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Featured Reviews

AlexOgbalu

Director at LiveFromSpace Limited

Improving support responsiveness has remained critical while access monitoring and compliance needs have been fully addressed

We have the enterprise licenses for the scanning of the codes, both at runtime and in development, and we also have access to Veracode's e-learning platform as well as a bundle from Veracode.All that has been mentioned is the main benefits Forcepoint CASB provides to us, and it helps us to meet compliance requirements that are necessary in our industry. It's important for enterprises considering Forcepoint to work with very good system integrators and value-added resellers because a lot of things needed go beyond just getting the licenses. You need someone skilled to do all those configurations, write all the rules, and make sure you achieve a very stable environment. I am giving this review an overall rating of eight.

Read full review

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product offers several advantageous features including real-time control and monitoring capabilities, helping identify and manage various activities including shadow IT activities."

"The most valuable aspect for us is the fact that the product seamlessly integrates with the Forcepoint DLP."

"As it is based on AWS, it is not a problem."

"Generally, most of our customers are happy with it though."

"The product offers an easy initial setup."

"The visibility around the usage of cloud applications within my tenant is the most valuable aspect of the solution, as the administrator gets visibility and control of these applications for users whether on-premise or not and whether using pocket devices or their IOD."

"Forcepoint CASB ensures that access to cloud applications is properly vetted and monitored, helping us unify access across the board regardless of device or location, while advanced notifications and behavior analytics make it easy to detect unknown connections or baseline changes."

"Most of the features are valuable, primarily for the firewalls, the proxy, and Forcepoint CASB products."

More Forcepoint CASB pros

"From a corporate perspective, I understand that it's important to keep the company data safe."

"Its initial setup was straightforward."

"The security aspect of the solution, particularly the malware behind it, is excellent. That's something that really helped us out. It's not just a simple proxy that just blocks the insights of potential threats that come on behind it. They do malware detection and that helps us a lot."

"Our primary use case for this product is DLP,"

"We chose iboss for both zero trust and proxy (SWG) because their SWG was superior."

"This product is solid, fairly easy to use, and reliable."

"Content filtering is the most useful feature of iboss."

"It was a very easy product to install. It can be deployed very fast."

More iboss pros

Cons

"It could be more robust, especially around custom applications."

"The deployment and initial setup can be quite difficult to install."

"Forcepoint CASB is mature and performing its function, but it is not easy to manage and not as fully-featured as competitors."

"I'd like to see different ways to authenticate users, perhaps different types of authentication."

"Forcepoint technical support in general could improve in this area."

"Forcepoint removed the ability to scan for unsanctioned applications on the CASB."

"They should work on the possibility of consolidating all of the products with the group of agents."

"The solution needs to be easier to install, and they need to clean up the backend, so stuff doesn't break."

More Forcepoint CASB cons

"Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device and filtering did not always work correctly."

"It is stable, but due to growth, it can sometimes be less stable than wanted."

"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."

"The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices; it is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents, and that is where in 2025 we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform."

"For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company ExxonMobil."

"Fold that in with the risk intelligence they're getting from all of the different subscriptions they are a part of. Now, these security companies subscribe to things like emerging threats, databases, etc. You can fold all this intelligence to decide what's happening on an endpoint. I would love to see them start moving into that space. That would compete directly with Microsoft. Maybe that's why they haven't. Having that ability native within the solution would be great. The other area in which I would love to see improvement is more detailed descriptions of why they block websites."

"If they could implement an extra security layer preventing access to iboss from the open internet, it would be great."

"Sometimes, obviously, there are bugs."

More iboss cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment."

"The solution is not that expensive compared to Zscaler. Netskope is between Forcepoint CASB and Zscaler in terms of cost. Forcepoint CASB would be the first choice because it negotiates well and offers a perpetual license, though it may seem subscription-based. I rate its pricing a six out of ten."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Forcepoint CASB?

I would put the pricing of Forcepoint CASB at a five, closer to a four. I don't think it's very expensive, but it's also not very cheap.

What needs improvement with Forcepoint CASB?

From a functionality perspective, I don't have any recommendations, but in terms of support, the speed of support is something that can be managed better. This is not exactly for Forcepoint CASB, b...

What is your primary use case for Forcepoint CASB?

Forcepoint CASB ensures that access to cloud applications is properly vetted and monitored. We have a lot of remote and field workers, and many staff members are not required to come into the offic...

What needs improvement with iboss?

I think iboss could be improved by making reporting and dashboard customization more flexible, and simplifying troubleshooting policy issues. Some advanced policy configurations have a learning cur...

What is your primary use case for iboss?

I use iboss as a cloud-based secure web gateway to provide secure internet access, web filtering, and protect remote users from web-based threats. In my day-to-day work, I enforce web access polici...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

My experience with iboss's pricing structure, setup cost, and licensing model has been positive, straightforward, and highly competitive compared to legacy network security vendors.

Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Forcepoint CASB

Comparisons

Compared 21% of the time

Netskope vs Forcepoint CASB

Compared 14% of the time

Proofpoint Cloud App Security Broker vs Forcepoint CASB

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Forcepoint CASB

Compared 8% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs Forcepoint CASB

Compared 6% of the time

More Forcepoint CASB Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Product Reports

Forcepoint CASB

Download Forcepoint CASB product report

Download iboss product report

Also Known As

Imperva Skyfence

iBoss Cloud Platform

Overview

Forcepoint CASB offers robust features for integrating with Forcepoint DLP, implementing adaptive security, and ensuring cloud application visibility. Its real-time monitoring and management simplicity are valued. Integration ease with macro and credential IDs, favorable pricing, and a straightforward setup are additional strengths.

Forcepoint CASB supports data protection in cloud environments, empowering organizations to manage and monitor access seamlessly across devices and locations. It provides behavior analytics, advanced notifications, and geo-specific login detections. However, there are integration challenges and backend reliability concerns. Enhancements are needed in system integration and dashboard usability. Authentication options are limited, and there are complexities with multiple agents that affect ease of use.

What features make Forcepoint CASB effective?

Integration with Forcepoint DLP: Ensures seamless data loss prevention capabilities.
Adaptive Security Policies: Tailors security measures to changing threats.
Shadow IT Discovery: Detects unauthorized applications in use.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides immediate insights into application usage.

What ROI benefits should users anticipate?

Scalability: Adaptable to growing security demands.
Favorable Pricing: Cost-effective compared to competitors.
Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial deployment processes.

In industries relying on remote workforces, Forcepoint CASB integrates with tools like Secure Web Gateway to unify and secure access. It is instrumental in providing analytics for connection monitoring and notifications for proactive threat management. Its applications in telecommunications and finance sectors demonstrate the importance of protecting remote environments and controlling access efficiently.

Forcepoint

iboss is the Zero Trust SASE platform that gives organizations complete visibility and governance over their AI, data, and applications through one unified platform, one console, one policy engine, and one data lake.

Your endpoints may already stop malware. Your data and application activity can still be invisible. iboss decrypts and understands every connection, then turns that signal into answers security leaders can act on.

The platform leads with three capabilities in this order: AI Security and Visibility, Data Security and Visibility, and App Visibility and Control. Zero Trust Network Access, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN sit underneath as the access fabric that carries those three. Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

- AI Security and Visibility: conversation capture, shadow-AI discovery, AI DLP, and agent governance across Claude, Co-Work, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and emerging services.

- Data Security and Visibility: full SSL/TLS decryption, deep content inspection, MIP label compliance, and one-click compliance reporting.

- App Visibility and Control: signatureless CASB, dual risk scoring, in-app controls, and SSPM for major SaaS.

- Containerized Zero Trust SASE: dedicated containers, isolated SSL keys, one console, one policy engine, one data lake.

- Access fabric: ZTNA, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN under the same platform.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

- Complete visibility over AI, data, and applications from one platform instead of separate point tools.

- Encrypted traffic is inspected by default so data decisions use content and context together.

- Shadow SaaS and new web tools appear as they are used, with enforceable controls in one console.

- Native data sovereignty through dedicated containers, in-region inspection, and per-customer SSL key custody.

- Scale proven in published materials: 10M+ users, 100+ countries, 150B+ transactions, 2.5B+ threats blocked.

Economic buyers are CISOs, CIOs, and VPs of Security. Champions include security architects, network and infrastructure leaders, SecOps, and GRC. Primary segments: enterprise and business, financial services, government (including FedRAMP Gov Cloud), healthcare, manufacturing, legal and professional services, retail and hospitality, and MSP/MSSP partners. Education, including K-12, is one vertical among these.

Sample Customers

Zions Bank, GE Healthcare, HomeAway, Logitech, Universal, California National Resources Agency and many mor

Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

Forcepoint CASB vs. iboss