FME vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Safe Software and WSO2 are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.7, while WSO2 is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.3. Safe Software holds a 1.8% mindshare in DI, compared to WSO2’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 5 FME reviews

2,434 Views
1,771 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 19 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

714 Views
488 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

FME

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

FME and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator are competing products in the data integration and orchestration space. FME is often favored for ease of use and support network, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is recognized for its robust feature set and wide-ranging capabilities, making it a preferred choice for complex integration needs.

Features: FME offers a user-friendly graphical interface, numerous connectors, and spatial data integration capabilities, making it ideal for easy data transformations. Its drag-and-drop interface simplifies workflow creation, and it excels in geographical transformations and analysis. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator provides extensive API support, robust integration processes, and advanced mediation capabilities. It includes a strong development environment with adaptable connectors for diverse systems, enhancing its usability in complex enterprise settings.

Room for Improvement: FME could enhance its feature set to cover more complex integration scenarios and improve tooling for non-spatial data types. It may also expand its APIs for better modernization. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, refining documentation quality, and enhancing the occasional support variability that affects user experience. Making its initial configuration less resource-intensive could also be a focus.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FME is praised for its straightforward deployment and effective customer support that eases setup complexities. In contrast, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator requires more technical expertise for deployment, though it provides comprehensive documentation and a community-driven support model. Its deployment mechanisms, while robust, may complicate the setup for users without extensive technical backgrounds.

Pricing and ROI: FME offers transparent pricing with predictable costs, beneficial for small to medium-scale projects with a quick ROI. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, while involving a higher initial setup cost due to its richer feature set, is aligned with organizations seeking extensive integration solutions, providing substantial long-term ROI for complex needs. Pricing for FME starts at $3600, while WSO2 offers open-source options with varied additional expenses based on enterprise needs.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

24th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Data Integration

31st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"The connectors have been the most impactful features for handling integrations. I can use these connectors when I need specific connectivity with a third party, like a core banking system in BFSI. I don't need to do all the development. I take the specific connector, put in the IP address and password, and it takes care of everything."

"The installation process is easy."

"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."

"It was mostly easy to set up the product."

"The stability is excellent."

"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."

"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"The customization can be a bit difficult."

"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."

"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

"The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems."

"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

30%

Energy/Utilities Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

25%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 25% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 13% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 10% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

Fivetran vs FME

Compared 6% of the time

More FME Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 9% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 9% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

May 2025

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

April 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

West

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

April 2025

Free Report: FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.