FME vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Safe Software and WSO2 are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Safe Software is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5, while WSO2 is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3. Safe Software holds a 1.8% mindshare in DI, compared to WSO2’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 7 FME reviews

2,778 Views
2,167 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,813 Views
653 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

FME

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

FME and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator are competing products in the data integration and orchestration space. FME is often favored for ease of use and support network, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is recognized for its robust feature set and wide-ranging capabilities, making it a preferred choice for complex integration needs.

Features: FME offers a user-friendly graphical interface, numerous connectors, and spatial data integration capabilities, making it ideal for easy data transformations. Its drag-and-drop interface simplifies workflow creation, and it excels in geographical transformations and analysis. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator provides extensive API support, robust integration processes, and advanced mediation capabilities. It includes a strong development environment with adaptable connectors for diverse systems, enhancing its usability in complex enterprise settings.

Room for Improvement: FME could enhance its feature set to cover more complex integration scenarios and improve tooling for non-spatial data types. It may also expand its APIs for better modernization. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, refining documentation quality, and enhancing the occasional support variability that affects user experience. Making its initial configuration less resource-intensive could also be a focus.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FME is praised for its straightforward deployment and effective customer support that eases setup complexities. In contrast, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator requires more technical expertise for deployment, though it provides comprehensive documentation and a community-driven support model. Its deployment mechanisms, while robust, may complicate the setup for users without extensive technical backgrounds.

Pricing and ROI: FME offers transparent pricing with predictable costs, beneficial for small to medium-scale projects with a quick ROI. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, while involving a higher initial setup cost due to its richer feature set, is aligned with organizations seeking extensive integration solutions, providing substantial long-term ROI for complex needs. Pricing for FME starts at $3600, while WSO2 offers open-source options with varied additional expenses based on enterprise needs.

To learn more, read our detailed FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Data Integration

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of FME is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes."

"From my reseller perspective, the best features in FME are the ease of operation and the fact that it works."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"The solution basically conforms to our standards."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"The customer service executives are very responsive."

"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."

"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

"The installation process is easy."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"They should release upgrades more frequently."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."

"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."

"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

31%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...

See all answers

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 23% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 12% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 8% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

More FME Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Mule ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

August 2025

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

July 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

West

Buyer's Guide

FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

July 2025

Free Report: FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.