For simpler tasks or simpler use cases, we avoid using WSO2 Enterprise Integrator because it is quite complex. So it is easier to manage some more simple solutions than that. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator supports different deployment models, such as on-prem and on-cloud, but it is difficult to answer this question because in the past, this was quite often on-premise. In the last five years, the situation has changed because there is a national informatic environment that was decided by the government and all the public healthcare companies are more or less obliged in the future to migrate on this centralized environment that is in a cloud situation. The trend is to go in a cloud environment. The problem is that this environment, as usually here in Italy, is very buggy and full of problems of any kind. When you go there, you have no problem in your normal environment. You go there, you are full of problems immediately. Regarding support of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I must say that I have never used the direct support from Colombo, directly from the producer of the package. But there are some companies in Italy that give some help with this. I know many people, so I usually use some kind of local support. But it is not related to the producer, so it is not an official WSO2 support. It is a company that has built expertise over some years from some implementations and so on. It is much easier to address the problem using this kind of capability than to go to escalation. For other situations, I open a ticket, we produce, we exchange many emails with all the details, problems, configuration, environment, and so on. But at the end, usually, we are able to solve the problem. I would rate WSO2 Enterprise Integrator nine out of ten from a functional viewpoint, very high. About the complexity instead, it is very difficult to manage. So from the complexity viewpoint, it is a low value. From the capabilities and functional possibility and anything else technical, it is a very well-done product, I have to say. It is really difficult to build something similar from scratch. It needs capability and resources and so on that are very difficult to put together. It is not easy to find something else with the same capability. In my opinion, I use other products such as Picasso or others. I use three, four, five, six, not only this one. In my opinion, it is by far the best, but the problem is the complexity.
I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. Integration is very custom, not standard. If a particular use case requires connectors that are available in the WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, then it's very good for that project. They have more than 2000 connectors, and they're increasing. So 80-90% of the time, it will definitely meet any requirements. Maybe five to ten percent might be missing. But when you raise that with the OEM, they're very supportive and will come up with additional connectors.
Incident Manager at Iguatemi Empresa de Shopping Centers SA
Real User
Jul 12, 2023
This product is more like an accelerator, which helps your business go fast. These are among very few solutions available for security purposes, in terms of banking accelerators and other enterprises. If you want to accelerate your products and business, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator can be a good solution. It is organic and makes everything visually easy to understand and operate. Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten.
I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. I'd recommend the product to others. It was issue free while I used it. If you have a legacy system, you can use this product. It is really, really easy. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten overall.
Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Feb 16, 2023
It is a good product. However, I haven't been in touch with the most recent security patches. I don't have anything negative to say about the product. I would rate it as a six out of ten. There is a scope for improvement at the same time. I haven't used the product extensively enough to say that it is the best product.
Enterprise Architect at a manufacturing company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Dec 1, 2022
We are using the most current update of the product. I'd advise new users to evaluate the features of the product versus the requirements and to make sure that this is a good fit before committing to the product. I'd rate the solution five out of ten, basically in the middle. I wasn't involved with the tool from the very beginning, and now we are moving away from it. I may not be the best source of information on the intricacies of the product itself.
I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including validation exports for XPath. I recommend this solution to people considering it.
We're partners. I've used, from the very beginning, the fourth version. Now I'm using the 6.5 version. I've been pleased with the solution. It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Future users should keep in mind that they will need at least a little bit of guidance from an API manager. It is not likely that they will be able to just install and handle it directly. They will need some bit of guidance and support.
We are a partner with the company. We always use on-premises deployments as we only work with on-prem. While I am still exploring the solution, I've so far been pretty satisfied with it. I'd rate it at a nine out of ten so far. From my experience so far, I would recommend the solution to other users and companies. It's very customizable and the support is there if you need help. Of course, we are still in the design phase, and it is still early.
It is a good solution. It has many integration components. I would rate it a six out of ten. Not a ten because it's not so easy and it's a little difficult to deploy on a platform. It is difficult to build a high availability platform. In the next release, it should be faster.
My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to start with a proof of concept project. That will allow them to properly scale it or benchmark it for their internal capacity. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is known for its robust integration and transformation capabilities with a user-friendly interface. It provides comprehensive API management, format conversion, and integration standardization, ensuring efficient and scalable operations.WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is a versatile platform valued for integrating legacy systems, orchestrating APIs, and transforming data formats such as XML to JSON. Its open-source nature offers flexibility in adapting to diverse system...
For simpler tasks or simpler use cases, we avoid using WSO2 Enterprise Integrator because it is quite complex. So it is easier to manage some more simple solutions than that. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator supports different deployment models, such as on-prem and on-cloud, but it is difficult to answer this question because in the past, this was quite often on-premise. In the last five years, the situation has changed because there is a national informatic environment that was decided by the government and all the public healthcare companies are more or less obliged in the future to migrate on this centralized environment that is in a cloud situation. The trend is to go in a cloud environment. The problem is that this environment, as usually here in Italy, is very buggy and full of problems of any kind. When you go there, you have no problem in your normal environment. You go there, you are full of problems immediately. Regarding support of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I must say that I have never used the direct support from Colombo, directly from the producer of the package. But there are some companies in Italy that give some help with this. I know many people, so I usually use some kind of local support. But it is not related to the producer, so it is not an official WSO2 support. It is a company that has built expertise over some years from some implementations and so on. It is much easier to address the problem using this kind of capability than to go to escalation. For other situations, I open a ticket, we produce, we exchange many emails with all the details, problems, configuration, environment, and so on. But at the end, usually, we are able to solve the problem. I would rate WSO2 Enterprise Integrator nine out of ten from a functional viewpoint, very high. About the complexity instead, it is very difficult to manage. So from the complexity viewpoint, it is a low value. From the capabilities and functional possibility and anything else technical, it is a very well-done product, I have to say. It is really difficult to build something similar from scratch. It needs capability and resources and so on that are very difficult to put together. It is not easy to find something else with the same capability. In my opinion, I use other products such as Picasso or others. I use three, four, five, six, not only this one. In my opinion, it is by far the best, but the problem is the complexity.
I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. Integration is very custom, not standard. If a particular use case requires connectors that are available in the WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, then it's very good for that project. They have more than 2000 connectors, and they're increasing. So 80-90% of the time, it will definitely meet any requirements. Maybe five to ten percent might be missing. But when you raise that with the OEM, they're very supportive and will come up with additional connectors.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I rate the overall tool a seven out of ten.
This product is more like an accelerator, which helps your business go fast. These are among very few solutions available for security purposes, in terms of banking accelerators and other enterprises. If you want to accelerate your products and business, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator can be a good solution. It is organic and makes everything visually easy to understand and operate. Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten.
I highly recommend this solution to anyone who is considering its use. I would rate WSO2 Enterprise Integrator a nine out of ten.
I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. I'd recommend the product to others. It was issue free while I used it. If you have a legacy system, you can use this product. It is really, really easy. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten overall.
I recommend the solution to others and rate it as a nine.
It is a good product. However, I haven't been in touch with the most recent security patches. I don't have anything negative to say about the product. I would rate it as a six out of ten. There is a scope for improvement at the same time. I haven't used the product extensively enough to say that it is the best product.
We are using the most current update of the product. I'd advise new users to evaluate the features of the product versus the requirements and to make sure that this is a good fit before committing to the product. I'd rate the solution five out of ten, basically in the middle. I wasn't involved with the tool from the very beginning, and now we are moving away from it. I may not be the best source of information on the intricacies of the product itself.
I would rate WSO2 Enterprise Integrator an eight out of ten.
I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including validation exports for XPath. I recommend this solution to people considering it.
We're partners. I've used, from the very beginning, the fourth version. Now I'm using the 6.5 version. I've been pleased with the solution. It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Future users should keep in mind that they will need at least a little bit of guidance from an API manager. It is not likely that they will be able to just install and handle it directly. They will need some bit of guidance and support.
We are a partner with the company. We always use on-premises deployments as we only work with on-prem. While I am still exploring the solution, I've so far been pretty satisfied with it. I'd rate it at a nine out of ten so far. From my experience so far, I would recommend the solution to other users and companies. It's very customizable and the support is there if you need help. Of course, we are still in the design phase, and it is still early.
It is a good solution. It has many integration components. I would rate it a six out of ten. Not a ten because it's not so easy and it's a little difficult to deploy on a platform. It is difficult to build a high availability platform. In the next release, it should be faster.
My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to start with a proof of concept project. That will allow them to properly scale it or benchmark it for their internal capacity. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We don't use the cloud version; we have our own servers. I would rate this solution eight out of ten.