FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC vs InfoScale comparison

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracl...

Read 9 InfoScale reviews

1,804 Views
848 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 21, 2026

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC and InfoScale enhance database performance and reliability in enterprise environments. FlashGrid seems to have the upper hand in cloud integration, while InfoScale offers broader infrastructure support.

Features: FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC provides seamless integration, automated deployment processes, and robust cloud services. InfoScale includes applications for availability management, extensive support for virtualization and containerization, and optimized storage management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FlashGrid Cluster offers automated deployment and proactive customer service tailored for cloud platforms. InfoScale accommodates various environments with a flexible deployment model and a comprehensive support structure, requiring a more hands-on approach.

Pricing and ROI: FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC involves a higher initial setup cost but offers significant ROI via reduced operational costs particularly in cloud environments. InfoScale presents competitive pricing but with a slower ROI, designed for versatile infrastructure support.

To learn more, read our detailed FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC vs. InfoScale Report (Updated: August 2026).

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC vs. InfoScale

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,099 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracl...

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

InfoScale

Ranking in High Availability Clustering

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (14th), Data Storage for Kubernetes (2nd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the High Availability Clustering category, the mindshare of FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is 2.3%. The mindshare of InfoScale is 21.8%, down from 28.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

High Availability Clustering Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfoScale	21.8%
FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC	2.3%
Other	75.9%

High Availability Clustering

Featured Reviews

Snehasish Das

Technology Leader at eTCaaS

Migration to cloud has cut database costs and simplified shared storage but still needs lower latency

The best features FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC offers include shared storage, which is critical because for on-premise Oracle high availability clusters, I do not need FlashGrid. When I migrate to the public cloud, I need FlashGrid to provide that shared storage. It is easy to migrate from on-premise to cloud because the Oracle architecture does not change; the only difference is that in the public cloud, shared storage block was not available, but FlashGrid provides that feature to the Oracle RAC cluster. FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC has positively impacted my organization cost-wise because by migrating to the cloud from my on-premise data center, I could consolidate the price structure for my storage and compute needs. Oracle RAC was the bottleneck for that because previously, without FlashGrid, I could not configure Oracle RAC in the public cloud, but with FlashGrid, I managed to consolidate costs for Oracle RAC infrastructure in the cloud. After migrating with FlashGrid, I have a substantial presence of Oracle RAC clusters in my data centers, around 50 RAC clusters across the U.S., and each was costing around $100,000 per year per cluster. However, I was able to migrate 25 of those clusters to the public cloud using FlashGrid, and the cost was reduced to $50,000 for those clusters, meaning I saved $50,000 per annum for the 25 instances. After installing and configuring FlashGrid in AWS cloud, I was able to reduce the storage cost substantially compared to my on-premise data center storage. I saved $50,000 per Oracle RAC cluster per annum using FlashGrid, which includes both storage cost, compute cost, and also manpower cost.

Read full review

TABISH JAVED

Site Reliability Engineer (Certified) at Kyndryl India

Automated recovery has minimized downtime and supports seamless multi‑datacenter failover

Beyond pricing, there are areas where I would like to see InfoScale improved or enhanced. Veritas offers three management approaches. The first, which Veritas currently recommends, is Veritas Operation Manager. The second is the Cluster Manager Java Console graphical interface. The Cluster Manager Java Console has not been revised since version 6.1 or 6.2. This tool was critical for me, particularly valuable when managing small cluster footprints of 20 to 30 server nodes. I relied heavily on this tool, but Veritas has moved away from it in favor of Operation Manager. I recommend Veritas continue evolving this tool rather than discarding it. The third approach is the command line, suitable for individuals with extensive Veritas expertise and experience, but command line use in live environments consumed excessive time, leading me to prefer the graphical interface. Apart from pricing, I have not discovered disadvantages. The product is excellent. My concern is Veritas discarding the Cluster Manager Java Console in favor of Veritas Operation Manager. Setting up Operation Manager requires time and a dedicated server that runs continuously. I had to create a single server just for Veritas Operation Manager. While this works well for larger environments with hundreds of clusters, it is less useful for smaller deployments. I still recommend Veritas reconsider this application and evolve it by incorporating new features from Veritas Operation Manager. Adding these new features to the Java console would be beneficial because that tool runs on my laptop without consuming environment resources, and I can connect directly to clusters from my laptop. I am not opposing Veritas Operation Manager, which is excellent and resembles hardware management consoles for power machines, but smaller tools that previously performed these tasks should remain as options to provide clients with greater ease. From a features and functionality perspective, I do not find missing features in InfoScale at this moment. However, I am not actively using Veritas, managing only legacy machines on older hardware. I am upgrading operating systems but not Veritas due to contract expiration and end-of-life status. The contract is not being renewed because the customer wants to move away. Since I have not logged into VCS since 2021 and transferred responsibilities to another team, I am unaware of features arriving in version 8 or beyond and cannot comment specifically on recent Veritas introductions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability and performance of the cluster during testing were impressive."

"I saved $50,000 per Oracle RAC cluster per annum using FlashGrid, which includes both storage cost, compute cost, and also manpower cost."

"In a live incident scenario, the data replication process occurs in real-time, and compared to other products, this data replication feature works effectively, ensuring data availability, and we can implement this scenario using Veritas Volume Replication (VVR), which is the most usable feature in InfoScale for data replication."

"The best feature is that it supports high availability and automatic failover, which minimizes downtime and helps the environment reduce downtime and improve high availability for critical applications."

"It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment."

"InfoScale does that all by itself without any dependency on different solutions."

"Over the last two years, we did not experience any application failover or receive alerts due to the immediate switchover mechanism in active-active mode that ensures no downtime, helping us significantly with confidence and trust in our organization."

"It's a stable solution."

"From a recovery standpoint, InfoScale is excellent and easy to manage."

"The best feature in InfoScale is the file system, which is the greatest feature as you can get any storage LUN from any hardware because it's software-defined and create a volume that can consist of storage from two or more different vendors, which avoids any vendor lock-in and makes it easier when you expand as time goes."

More InfoScale pros

Cons

"One weakness is that there might be performance degradation once I install Oracle RAC in the public cloud using FlashGrid; that is one weakness I have encountered after migrating to the public cloud with FlashGrid."

"There is room for improvement in the area of migration or integration with existing on-premises infrastructure."

"It's very difficult to implement."

"The primary concern is licensing cost, as the customer is unwilling to invest further and has begun cost-cutting measures."

"Many customers can see the benefits of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to buy the products and solutions because of the licensing costs."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go for it anyways."

"Many customers can see the benefit of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to purchase the product because the license cost is very high."

"Based on my experience with support, I would rate them a nine, only because occasionally the first person I talk to does not know more than I do and it needs to be escalated to reach someone more knowledgeable."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is a little higher and should be reduced since most companies cannot afford it."

"It could be more stable and more secure."

More InfoScale cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the setup cost is not very complicated because I have skilled manpower who managed Oracle RAC in my data centers. Configuring FlashGrid...

What needs improvement with FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?

One weakness is that there might be performance degradation once I install Oracle RAC in the public cloud using FlashGrid; that is one weakness I have encountered after migrating to the public clou...

What is your primary use case for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?

My main use case for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is where I need a high availability solution for Oracle databases and where I have the requirement to migrate to the cloud. When I have an on-p...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go f...

What needs improvement with Veritas InfoScale Availability?

InfoScale can be improved if it added more robust reporting features; it has reporting, but it is very simple. If it created an integration with a reporting tool that makes it official, customers c...

What is your primary use case for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My main use case for InfoScale is that we use it in many scenarios. In some scenarios, we use it for clustering for a product like Enterprise Vault, using InfoScale Enterprise, where we handle the ...

VNS3 vs FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC

Comparisons

Compared 100% of the time

More FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC Competitors

Windows Server Failover Clustering vs InfoScale

Compared 13% of the time

Portworx Enterprise vs InfoScale

Compared 11% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs InfoScale

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Platform Computing LSF vs InfoScale

Compared 10% of the time

HPE Serviceguard vs InfoScale

Compared 9% of the time

More InfoScale Competitors

Product Reports

High Availability Clustering

July 2026

Download FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC product report

Download InfoScale product report

August 2026

Also Known As

FlashGrid for Oracle RAC and Database HA (on OL 9), FlashGrid for Oracle RAC and Database HA (on RHEL 9)

Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes

Overview

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC offers robust infrastructure for deploying Oracle RAC databases, prioritizing reliability and performance in critical environments.

Designed to enhance Oracle RAC deployments, FlashGrid Cluster simplifies infrastructure management through automation. It boosts operational efficiency with compatibility across traditional and cloud platforms, ensuring consistent performance and rapid deployment. This makes it ideal for businesses aiming to optimize database environments with minimal complexity.

What are the most important features of FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?

Automated Deployment: Simplifies setup without manual intervention, using consistent configurations.
Seamless Cloud Integration: Supports diverse cloud environments, offering flexibility and scalability.
High Availability: Ensures continuous database operations, minimizing downtime risks.
Performance Optimization: Enhances database throughput and response times, crucial for demanding applications.

What benefits and ROI should be considered in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by minimizing the need for extensive hardware investments.
Scalability: Provides easy scaling without significant infrastructure changes, supporting growth.
Operational Simplicity: Reduces complexity in managing Oracle RAC environments, enhancing productivity.
Reliability: Maintains consistent service levels, which is key for critical applications.

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is widely adopted across finance, healthcare, and telecommunications sectors, offering tailored solutions to meet the specific demands of each industry. Organizations benefit from its reliability and performance, crucial for sustaining high workloads and ensuring uninterrupted data access.

FlashGrid

InfoScale delivers robust data availability and protection for enterprises by managing critical workloads across hybrid cloud environments, ensuring minimal downtime and seamless performance.

InfoScale is designed to enhance data resilience and operational efficiency. By enabling quick data access across hybrid infrastructures, it reduces potential downtime and enhances business continuity. Its scalable architecture adapts to dynamic workloads, providing reliable performance under pressure while maintaining seamless integration with cloud-based solutions.

What are the key features of InfoScale?

Data Resiliency: Ensures continuous data availability through advanced clustering and replication technologies.
Scalability: Supports dynamic scaling to meet changing demands without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Offers seamless transition and operation within cloud environments.
Automated Operations: Streamlines management processes with automation to reduce manual intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Uptime: Improved reliability translates to reduced business interruption.
Cost Efficiency: Potentially lowers operational costs through optimized resource allocation.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection measures for critical data assets.
Operational Agility: Facilitates swift adaptation to evolving business requirements.

InfoScale is particularly effective in sectors such as healthcare and finance where data integrity and uptime are crucial. Its implementation empowers industries to handle data-intensive operations efficiently, ensuring continuity and compliance with industry standards.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Wayne State University, Zenith Mart