No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC vs VNS3 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracl...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
High Availability Clustering (6th)
VNS3
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC and VNS3 aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is designed for High Availability Clustering and holds a mindshare of 2.3%.
VNS3, on the other hand, focuses on AWS Marketplace, holds 0.3% mindshare, down 0.3% since last year.
High Availability Clustering Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC2.3%
InfoScale21.8%
Windows Server Failover Clustering14.8%
Other61.099999999999994%
High Availability Clustering
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
VNS30.3%
Stardog Enterprise Knowledge Graph Platform0.4%
Prior Labs TabPFN-2.50.3%
Other99.0%
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

SD
Technology Leader at eTCaaS
Migration to cloud has cut database costs and simplified shared storage but still needs lower latency
The best features FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC offers include shared storage, which is critical because for on-premise Oracle high availability clusters, I do not need FlashGrid. When I migrate to the public cloud, I need FlashGrid to provide that shared storage. It is easy to migrate from on-premise to cloud because the Oracle architecture does not change; the only difference is that in the public cloud, shared storage block was not available, but FlashGrid provides that feature to the Oracle RAC cluster. FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC has positively impacted my organization cost-wise because by migrating to the cloud from my on-premise data center, I could consolidate the price structure for my storage and compute needs. Oracle RAC was the bottleneck for that because previously, without FlashGrid, I could not configure Oracle RAC in the public cloud, but with FlashGrid, I managed to consolidate costs for Oracle RAC infrastructure in the cloud. After migrating with FlashGrid, I have a substantial presence of Oracle RAC clusters in my data centers, around 50 RAC clusters across the U.S., and each was costing around $100,000 per year per cluster. However, I was able to migrate 25 of those clusters to the public cloud using FlashGrid, and the cost was reduced to $50,000 for those clusters, meaning I saved $50,000 per annum for the 25 instances. After installing and configuring FlashGrid in AWS cloud, I was able to reduce the storage cost substantially compared to my on-premise data center storage. I saved $50,000 per Oracle RAC cluster per annum using FlashGrid, which includes both storage cost, compute cost, and also manpower cost.
FA
Analytics Engineer at acquisition.ai
Centralized networking has secured multi-cloud data pipelines and improves analytics reliability
VNS3 could improve in terms of ease of setup, as while it is powerful, initial configuration for complex multi-cloud topologies can still feel quite technical and requires strong networking knowledge. Another potential improvement would be to tighten native integration with modern data stack tools; Airflow, dbt, and cloud data warehouses can benefit from more out-of-the-box connectivity templates. Additionally, the user interface and observability experience could be more modern and intuitive, especially for quickly diagnosing network flows without diving deep into logs. A pain point regarding needed improvements is that troubleshooting can still feel quite network engineering heavy. For data teams in my organization, we often want more pipeline-level visibility, such as directly seeing which ETL jobs or data flows are impacted when a tunnel or route changes. I would also appreciate more automation around policy setup, such as having auto-generated secure network templates for common data architectures such as AWS to Snowflake or on-premises to BigQuery, which would significantly reduce setup time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The stability and performance of the cluster during testing were impressive."
"I saved $50,000 per Oracle RAC cluster per annum using FlashGrid, which includes both storage cost, compute cost, and also manpower cost."
"VNS3 has positively impacted my organization by centralizing management and reducing operations overhead in terms of manpower and cost."
"People should try VNS3 as we have not faced any issues with this product and I recommend it to others."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the area of migration or integration with existing on-premises infrastructure."
"One weakness is that there might be performance degradation once I install Oracle RAC in the public cloud using FlashGrid; that is one weakness I have encountered after migrating to the public cloud with FlashGrid."
"VNS3 could improve in terms of ease of setup, as while it is powerful, initial configuration for complex multi-cloud topologies can still feel quite technical and requires strong networking knowledge."
"VNS3 could benefit from additional features such as the ability to share files through a pre-signed URL, which would be useful for team members to collaborate."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Insurance Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Construction Company
30%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Healthcare Company
11%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the setup cost is not very complicated because I have skilled manpower who managed Oracle RAC in my data centers. Configuring FlashGrid...
What needs improvement with FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?
One weakness is that there might be performance degradation once I install Oracle RAC in the public cloud using FlashGrid; that is one weakness I have encountered after migrating to the public clou...
What is your primary use case for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC?
My main use case for FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC is where I need a high availability solution for Oracle databases and where I have the requirement to migrate to the cloud. When I have an on-p...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VNS3?
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VNS3 are reasonable at the current price.
What needs improvement with VNS3?
VNS3 could benefit from additional features such as the ability to share files through a pre-signed URL, which would be useful for team members to collaborate. Implementing pre-signed URL functiona...
What is your primary use case for VNS3?
VNS3 is primarily used for backup and storage purposes, allowing us to maintain our daily logs and store them there. For compliance requirements, we archive files and other storage on VNS3. When we...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

FlashGrid for Oracle RAC and Database HA (on OL 9), FlashGrid for Oracle RAC and Database HA (on RHEL 9)
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale, Microsoft, Linbit and others in High Availability Clustering. Updated: July 2026.
909,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.