No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] vs Radware DDoS comparison

Why PeerSpot?
F5 and Radware are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Additionally, 100% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Radware users who would recommend it.
Radware DDoS
Read 59 Radware DDoS reviews
  • 9,584 Views
  • 9,584 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 24, 2025

F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] and Radware DDoS are competing in the DDoS protection category. Radware DDoS is perceived to have an edge due to its advanced features and higher perceived value.

Features: F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] is known for its strong integration capabilities, comprehensive protection against both volumetric and sophisticated DDoS threats, and cost-effectiveness. Radware DDoS stands out with its advanced behavioral analysis, machine-learning capabilities, and adaptive tuning, which enhance threat detection and mitigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] is noted for its straightforward deployment process and customer support. Radware DDoS offers robust documentation and responsive support despite its more complex implementation.

Pricing and ROI: F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] offers a lower setup cost suitable for companies seeking essential protection. Radware DDoS, with a higher price point, justifies the investment with superior threat mitigation capabilities and features enhancing long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Report (Updated: September 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
September 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Radware DDoS
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1326957 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1326957
Head Solutions and Innovations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Excellent DDoS protection with responsive technical support and a straightforward setup
It handles the whole process with a very smart configuration. Just like other F5 components, it runs on the BIG-IP appliance platform, which is renowned for F5 and can manage, along with other F5 components, what they call BIG-IP, an analytics platform. F5 can be probably be referred to as an application security company. They have very, very extensive knowledge on the standard application patterns and behaviors of different kinds of applications and protocols to which an application communicates with. Due to this, they can mitigate very effectively against DDoS attacks. That's something that you don't just find in the industry. The extent in which the solution is very effective is due to its ability to handle not just the most current signatures for malware, but also issues around emerging signatures. The Hybrid Defender has the ability to add a very rich source of intelligence via the F5 Threat Intelligence Chip Subscription and that provides a lot of intelligence. The intelligence is aggregated by a 24/7 research center in F5. The learnings are downloaded to every client of a F5 DDoS appliance, and that gives everyone all the contextual information they need to know to in order to analyze traffic effectively. F5 doesn't just block, it provides users with contextual information to go by. Most competitor's environments will have their appliance do a hard stop. This means they weigh traffic from real customers and that affects the overall business experience. F5, on the other hand, uses contextual information to be able to specify what is malicious traffic and what is real traffic. That comes from its pool of intelligence, and from its threat intelligence team.
Read full review
reviewer2663061 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2663061
Program Manager at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Advanced protection has optimized web and API performance while reducing infrastructure costs
From the features perspective and functionality-wise, there are areas of Radware DDoS that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. Version upgrades are being provided, but they should communicate with clients about these new features being available so clients can test them and deploy them on the disaster recovery system before moving to the live segment. There should be a test report that will provide confidence that the version is stable and everything will work properly. Last time we faced an issue with a version upgrade, and we faced extensive troubleshooting with littile bit more time in the troubleshooting process. It turned out to be a small issue that was resolved by the engineering team. I would like to see improved support from Radware DDoS. Sometimes in support, we have to log the call with their support partners rather than Radware. After ten years of experience, we know exactly what the issue is, and we understand that it cannot be handled by their support channel or partner level. Radware team always asks us to go through the partners, but sometimes we have found that the issue cannot be handled by the partners. After the partners fail to resolve the issue, it goes to the Radware team. At that time, one to two days of required timeline gets increased by one to two days. If Radware came into immediate action and resolved the issue rather than relying on their service partners, it would be better. After ten years, we have the knowledge of troubleshooting, and we understand that the issues we are facing with Radware can only be resolved by their team. However, due to their policy, they insist we move through the partner first, and only after the partner fails do they escalate to Radware. During that troubleshooting period of twenty-four to forty-eight hours, we remain in an unresolved state with the reported issue.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"F5, on the other hand, uses contextual information to be able to specify what is malicious traffic and what is real traffic."
"The user interface was recently changed in one of the latest versions, but we find it to be very good. The change was an improvement."
"Most competitor's environments will have their appliance do a hard stop. This means they weigh traffic from real customers and that affects the overall business experience. F5, on the other hand, uses contextual information to be able to specify what is malicious traffic and what is real traffic. That comes from its pool of intelligence, and from its threat intelligence team."
"The solution is stable and reliable; there are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."
"Its functionality is very good."
"Radware DDoS is very useful for us in protecting from many attacks, particularly flood attacks and SYN flood attacks, which we deal with in the banking environment."
"Radware's support is first class."
"The best feature is the auto mitigation of the DefensePro solution created by Radware."
"DDoS Protection Service provides excellent defense in the cloud, and the implementation and migration are very straightforward."
"The pricing is reasonable. It's not overly expensive."
"It ensures both security and performance. It achieves this by learning behavior patterns and providing protection without blocking normal traffic."
More Radware DDoS pros
 

Cons

"The solution needs better stability when it's utilized with virtual solutions."
"We've seen the rise of smaller entities, and their requirements grow by the day. Having the ability to give them appliances that fit their needs in terms of that small or medium-sized segment and the pricing they can handle would be something that's great to see."
"The product is good, but the company could improve its services by appointing customer success managers. This would ensure better interaction with customers and help resolve issues on both customer and supplier ends."
"As price increases based on the volume of net traffic, it can get expensive."
"There needs to be more reporting."
"The APSolute Vision feature needs improvement."
"We would like to have seven-layer functionality."
"I had some trouble in the registration account prior to deployment, but it was fixed. They were not very fast or responsive, however. It took about one week to resolve the issue."
"For first time users, the security configuration is a continuous learning process. It is not easy."
"The quality of first-level support might not be so high at times, especially if it is a technical team that is working or managing the DDoS environment as a client."
More Radware DDoS cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price varies by use case and there are monthly and annual licensing options. If you deploy on-premise, there is an annual license with the amount dependent on the throughput you need and which features you will be using - i.e. IPS, behavioral, etc."
"Radware DefensePro is a bit on the expensive side."
"The pricing is based on the amount of network traffic and the number of packets being inspected."
"I didn't check pricing of other providers in depth but verified with two, and found Radware to be significantly cheaper compared to F5."
"Radware Cloud DDoS is very expensive."
"Its pricing is competitive. The licensing model is also very competitive. It is customizable, so there is no issue at all. They have given us whatever we have asked in terms of the pricing model and SLA."
"Licensing of Radware is quite simple and straightforward, while Arbor DDos is a bit complicated."
"The product's pricing is a good value."
More Radware DDoS pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business29
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise29
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service?
For Radware Cloud DDoS Protection, the pricing model can vary based on a number of factors such as the scale of the business, the specific level of protection required, the geographical regions cov...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service?
The time it takes to upload a site to the cloud is critical when under attack. If a site is down, a quick response to migrate the site to the cloud is essential. It currently takes about 15 to 20 m...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service?
We use Radware's Cloud DDoS Protection Service to safeguard Cloud Graph with Layer Seven protection. To mitigate Layer Seven DDoS attacks on our servers, we implemented Radware Cloud DDoS Protectio...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

F5 Shape Security vs F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] Logo
F5 Shape Security vs F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL]
Compared 48% of the time
More F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] Competitors
Arbor DDoS vs Radware DDoS Logo
Arbor DDoS vs Radware DDoS
Compared 10% of the time
Cloudflare vs Radware DDoS Logo
Cloudflare vs Radware DDoS
Compared 9% of the time
Akamai App and API Protector vs Radware DDoS Logo
Akamai App and API Protector vs Radware DDoS
Compared 7% of the time
Cisco Secure DDoS Protection vs Radware DDoS Logo
Cisco Secure DDoS Protection vs Radware DDoS
Compared 5% of the time
Corero vs Radware DDoS Logo
Corero vs Radware DDoS
Compared 5% of the time
More Radware DDoS Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
September 2026
F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] reportDownload F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Radware DDoS
September 2026
Radware DDoS reportDownload Radware DDoS product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Radware DDoS Protection Service, Radware DefensePro, Radware DefenseFlow
 

Overview

At F5, we give our customers the freedom to securely deliver every app, anywhere—with confidence. All F5 products are highly programmable and integrate into any environment, whether on premises or in any cloud. To date, 48 of the Fortune 50 companies rely on F5 to deliver apps that customers and employees can securely access at any time, on any device, from any location.

F5

Radware DDoS provides robust multi-layer protection against distributed denial of service attacks, featuring real-time monitoring and anomaly detection. Its scalable cloud-based and on-site deployment options ensure effective safeguarding of critical infrastructure.

Offering comprehensive defense, Radware DDoS includes features like data scrubbing, signature updates, and SSL-based mitigation. Integrated platforms and a user-friendly interface streamline its deployment. With advanced reporting, analytics, and behavioral analysis powered by machine learning, users experience fewer false positives. Despite these strengths, users highlight the need for improved scalability, seamless deployment, and enhanced machine learning capabilities. Better documentation, pricing, and customer service remain areas of improvement.

What features does Radware DDoS offer?
  • Data Scrubbing: Filters malicious data from incoming traffic.
  • Signature Updates: Keeps threat signatures current.
  • SSL-Based Mitigation: Protects against SSL attacks.
  • Auto Mitigation: Quickly responds to detected threats.
  • Multi-Layer Protection: Defends across several attack vectors.
What benefits should users expect?
  • Scalable Protection: Adaptable to increasing demands.
  • Proactive Notifications: Alerts in real-time to threats.
  • Live Attack Insights: Provides real-time analytics.
  • Enhanced Security: Shields diverse sectors.
  • Reduced False Positives: Enabled by machine learning.

In industries like banking, telecom, and government, organizations employ Radware DDoS to protect networks from DDoS attacks. It ensures server, web service, and mail security while enabling traffic monitoring and unauthorized access blocking. Its cloud-based options serve entities seeking infrastructure security and network traffic analysis.

Radware
 

Sample Customers

City Bank, Ricacorp Properties, Miele, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office
Myntex, APAC retailers
Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
September 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Radware, Cloudflare, NETSCOUT and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection. Updated: September 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.