Epicor iScala vs Infor M3 comparison

Epicor and Infor are both solutions in the ERP category. Epicor is ranked #25 with an average rating of 6.0, while Infor is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Epicor holds a 0.5% mindshare in ERP, compared to Infor’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Epicor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Infor users who would recommend it.

Epicor iScala

Read 1 Epicor iScala review

316 Views
316 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Infor M3

Read 15 Infor M3 reviews

3,246 Views
3,149 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Epicor iScala

Infor M3

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Epicor iScala and Infor M3 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Infor and others in ERP.

To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ERP

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Epicor iScala

Ranking in ERP

25th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Epicor iScala is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infor M3 is 5.2%, up from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2379783

Senior Law Enforcement Executive at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

Offers inventory management, basic ERP functions but outdated interface

The interface looks a bit outdated. Epicor acquired iScala, which was originally developed in Sweden. I'm unsure if their intention is to eventually replace iScala with their primary Epicor ERP or continue developing iScala. Initially, it seemed they might replace it, but it appears iScala will remain a separate product.

Read full review

Pravinkumar Bhandare

Principal Consultant - Infor M3 at Merino Consulting Services

The solution is a reliable, stable, and cost-saving ERP

Different countries have different finance practices, but I believe they need to fine-tune their practices to match industry standards. Practices vary from country to country, for example, in India, it is different than in the US. Sometimes, clients require alternate processes that are not standard, but they claim that these are the standard practices in their industry. At those times, we feel that the option required is not available with the solution. This is not the case only for Infor M3. Other ERPs also have the same problem. We can't mold the ERP to fit the customer's requirements. There are some standards in place because many screens and programs are integrated into the finance process. We can't make modifications to fit the client's requirements. The customer needs specific screens for different users, so if that program is in place, we have one planning tool in Infor M3. Planners need to know all things related to manufacturing, purchase, and sales in order to make decisions about planning. In one of my clients, I came across the requirement that they were asking for user authority in the planning tool. This is not the case though, because all planners need to know all things. However, on the manufacturing side, we can say that the person who is working with machine operations only needs to know machine-related information and doesn't need knowledge of products or sales. That standard industry is available, so we can give access to the user as per their needs. If the maintenance people are there, we can give them limited access, but if the planner is there, we need to give them all access according to industry standards. However, this requirement from the client side is not possible with the standard Infor software, but Infor can consider implementing it if the need is larger for many customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The accounting, purchasing, and basic ERP functions work well. But they are a little bit older, but they work for us. The inventory management is good and necessary for any company that manages stock for production or services."

"The user interface and user experience were good."

"provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management."

"The most valuable feature of Infor M3 is the level of detail it has about the different manufacturing processes compared to other ERP solutions. Other ERP solutions provide the same level of integration as Infor M3, but Infor M3 specializes in several functions, such as planning and manufacturing."

"Its ease of use is most valuable. Inquiries are transparent, and it shows good information on each screen. We don't have to go to 14 different screens to find out about one item, which is a big advantage."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to cover different types of activities, and the requirement for maintenance and data is very low."

"Infor M3 has ready-made processes, which provide the best workflows."

"Infor M3 has several valuable features, including customer order management and integration capabilities with third-party applications like ION."

More Infor M3 pros

Cons

"We're facing challenges with iScala in the public sector, specifically healthcare. The system doesn't have sufficient support for the complexities of managing payments for doctors, nurses, and other healthcare staff."

"The solution's technical support is an area with shortcomings that need improvement, especially the support for the product named M3 rather than the support offered by Infor as an organization."

"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."

"I would like to have some kind of dashboard to show an overview of different data on the same dashboard or on the same screen instead of moving to BI."

"It should be improved in terms of procurement of the supply chain and business intelligence analysis. We have the Infor BI tool, but it's more complex to use than, for example, Power Pivot or QlikView in the market."

"Here in Infor M3, you have certain limitations where the main components cannot be modified—you must work around or use bolt-ons."

"The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from their end."

"The solution is stable but not agile."

"Infor should create one product to handle the whole business. At present, they make ERP systems for each type of business, and then sell additional features. I would like to have one system handing all organizations or all the business in deep ways and not have to buy additional features."

More Infor M3 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to local ERP solutions, it's on the higher side."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Epicor iScala?

The accounting, purchasing, and basic ERP functions work well. But they are a little bit older, but they work for us. The inventory management is good and necessary for any company that manages s...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Epicor iScala?

Compared to local ERP solutions, it's on the higher side.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Epicor iScala?

See all answers

What do you like most about Infor M3?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Some customers expect more out-of-box reports, and in some areas, they should provide more reports. However, Infor has introduced a report tool so that key users or global champions can generate re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

Infor M3 is specifically dominant in fashion, food and beverages, and chemicals manufacturing; it works into micro-verticals. In food and beverage, it specializes in meat processing, confectionery,...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Business One vs Epicor iScala

Compared 44% of the time

Epicor ERP vs Epicor iScala

Compared 37% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Epicor iScala

Compared 19% of the time

More Epicor iScala Competitors

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 49% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 16% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Infor M3

Compared 5% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Infor M3

Compared 3% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ERP

July 2025

Download Epicor iScala product report

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

August 2025

Download Infor M3 product report

Also Known As

iScala

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

Overview

Growth of our customers' business is at the heart of what we do. The strength of Epicor business solutions lies in a simplified approach to technology, inspired by our customers and how they work. More than 45 years of experience with our customers’ unique processes and operational requirements is built into every solution.

We provide flexible, industry-specific software that is designed around the precise needs of our manufacturing, distribution, retail, and service industry customers.

With a deep understanding of your industry, Epicor solutions promote growth while managing complexity. The result is powerful solutions that do exactly what you need—free your resources so you can profitably grow your business.

Epicor

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

Infor

Sample Customers

PLP Thailand, Crystal Jade, Mahajak Industry Co Ltd, CRS Electronics, AGM Container Controls, Pacific Insight Electronics

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Infor and others in ERP. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.