Infor M3 vs SAP S/4HANA comparison

Infor and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7, while SAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. Infor holds a 2.9% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Infor M3

Read 15 Infor M3 reviews

3,114 Views
3,021 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

SAP S/4HANA

Read 125 SAP S/4HANA reviews

9,678 Views
8,613 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Infor M3

SAP S/4HANA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Infor M3 and SAP S/4HANA are leading enterprise resource planning solutions. SAP S/4HANA shows a significant edge with its advanced features and innovation, while Infor M3 offers distinct advantages in pricing.

Features: Infor M3 supports manufacturing and distribution sectors with its flexible supply chain and equipment management capabilities. Its tools are geared towards simplifying industry-specific processes. SAP S/4HANA stands out with comprehensive business process integration, embedded analytics, and a wide variety of SAP tools, making it suitable for large enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Infor M3 could enhance its analytics capabilities and expand its industry versatility beyond manufacturing and distribution. It might also benefit from improving its global support network. SAP S/4HANA can work on simplifying its implementation process and addressing pricing concerns for smaller businesses. Expanding support for niche industries would also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infor M3 offers a simpler and quicker implementation, often appealing to businesses seeking efficient deployment, alongside effective support services. SAP S/4HANA, although offering extensive support resources, involves a more complex implementation process that may require additional time and resources.

Pricing and ROI: Infor M3 is noted for its competitive pricing and faster return on investment, making it attractive for small to medium enterprises. Meanwhile, SAP S/4HANA, despite higher initial costs, offers extensive functionality and scalability, contributing to long-term value, especially for large corporations with complex requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor M3 vs. SAP S/4HANA Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. SAP S/4HANA

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor M3

Ranking in ERP

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (8th)

SAP S/4HANA

Ranking in ERP

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

125

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor M3 is 2.9%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S/4HANA is 6.3%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP S/4HANA	6.3%
Infor M3	2.9%
Other	90.8%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Umesh D

Vice President, Delivery at Independent Computer Consulting Group, Incorporated

Maximized industry-specific process efficiency with rapid implementation

The best features of Infor M3 are the micro-vertical and industry ready-made solutions rather than generic solutions. They have ready-made solutions ready, so the implementation of the process discovery happens very fast. It won't take more than two months, and if the process is very simple and they adopt the standard, it may happen within five weeks, covering the implementation cycle which will finish within seven to eight months. Most of the time, it helps streamline business processes; maybe some processes such as unique subcontracting vary by continent or job work, which could be different due to legal compliance. Other than that, everything helps because the processes are very much streamlined. Everywhere you have a check and maker concept, there is a workflow, and all those things are there; document management is also very simple. You can drag and drop the reports. The workflow feature is very good and flexible, working with multi-level authorization and all those capabilities. Apart from that, the GUI interface screens are really good. Users can design their own workspace based on the roles, and there are roles-based security options, with many roles available that you need not define—you can just tweak them.

Read full review

Effendy Mohamed

Principal Instrument and Control at PETRONAS

Empowered decision-making accelerates with enhanced analytics capabilities

In my opinion, areas of SAP S/4HANA that have room for improvement would be in AI and insights generation, which would be a good enhancement for the future. Currently, this analytics is still driven by some sort of structured reporting system. Although it is easier, you still need to do some configuration of it. With AI functionality, you could just prompt and request the information, and then the version would quickly be revealed to you.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its ease of use is most valuable; inquiries are transparent, and it shows good information on each screen so we don't have to go to 14 different screens to find out about one item, which is a big advantage."

"The solution provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management."

"provides all modules, supply chain, HR - it's good for management."

"M3 has several useful features for managing supply chains, production, and customer orders. It's an excellent system that helps me meet all my requirements for fixed costs."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is highly customizable."

"Its ease of use is most valuable. Inquiries are transparent, and it shows good information on each screen. We don't have to go to 14 different screens to find out about one item, which is a big advantage."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Infor GL tool that allows us to do our application support and development."

"Infor comes up with different tools every year, and they are all compatible with Infor M3, which makes it a more reliable and trustworthy tool. The integration is very smooth."

More Infor M3 pros

"The processing time has been reduced, and the screens have become more intuitive, leading to a faster user experience."

"I have been using SAP for more than 13 years and the new SAP S4HANA was not only a simple upgrade, they have made a lot of improvements. They have simplified a lot of the functions, the all-new interface gives users a better experience. The database itself is quite efficient in nature and it provides effective data queries. It is a good upgrade from the previous version of SAP R/3."

"The biggest benefit of SAP S_4HANA is that you can manage all ERP systems effectively; if you're a production company, you can track product costs, manage profitability easily, and define sales prices."

"We are able to get all our processes flowing together, and we are able to make all of our business processes talk to each other."

"I have found the most valuable feature to be the SAP Fiori application."

"We use the solution for a retail customer. As an administrator, my activities involve system installation, troubleshooting, and performance management."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Overall, I would rate the product ten out of ten."

More SAP S/4HANA pros

Cons

"Customer support from Infor is responsive and addresses issues, but the response time can be delayed, which sometimes leads me to explore private vendors."

"Improvements could be made in security and scalability."

"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."

"The product's technical support has certain shortcomings. Sometimes, my company doesn't get a proper response from their end."

"Infor should create one product to handle the whole business. At present, they make ERP systems for each type of business, and then sell additional features. I would like to have one system handing all organizations or all the business in deep ways and not have to buy additional features."

"Here in Infor M3, you have certain limitations where the main components cannot be modified—you must work around or use bolt-ons."

"The implementation could be simplified, it's complex."

"Sometimes, M3 alone cannot handle all the planning functionalities required by a customer. It has to be used along with industry-specific planning tools because M3 doesn't have all the features. However, no product can handle all the requirements of all the industries. There will be some shortcomings in all the products. Though this is an area for improvement, it is not a very serious shortfall or limitation. It can be covered by using third-party planning applications that integrate with Infor M3."

More Infor M3 cons

"S/4HANA could be improved with better integration. At the moment, a main issue I see is that there's so much growth in the functionality, complementary modules, and cloud solutions which were acquired by SAP and which extend the functionality of the SAP ERP suite. It looks to me that they tend to acquire more and more functionality from acquisitions, but they don't invest enough effort into making them integrated with S/4HANA or ERP. I would say that the functionality is great, but integration is something which still needs more attention. Instead of focusing on acquisitions, they should invest, integrate, and better the existing portfolio of products in SAP. It would help us, as implementors, to have a more complex or compact solution."

"The integration could be made a little simpler in terms of design and implementation."

"The scalability could be better."

"Introducing better functions to our customers with the Fiori app is not easy for consultants."

"An area for improvement would be integration with different kinds of legacies. In the next release, I would like the product to be prepared for blockchain technology and the best way to communicate with social networking."

"The difficulty level of the initial setup depends on the person's skills. If you know the basic knowledge of the database, then it will be easy, otherwise, it will be very difficult."

"The solution’s pricing could be reduced and made more cost effective."

"It is not a very good product from the perspective of ease-of-use."

More SAP S/4HANA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is between $50 and $100 per user annually."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. The price is based on the modules you need. There are several modules, such as HR module, accounting module, sales module, scheduling module, etc., and the price will vary depending on the number of modules you choose. The customers always say that it's very expensive. It can cost a lot of money if your organization is huge. It's not implemented in a lot of organizations in my country because it's too expensive."

"If you compare Infor M3 to SAP, Infor M3 is less expensive than SAP, but if you compare Infor M3 to Dynamics 365, Infor M3 is more expensive. It also depends on the model that you buy. It depends on whether you have the complete package or whether you have separate models."

"The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"I'm not part of the team that manages Infor M3 pricing, but it depends on the client, integration, ship-out, and training levels. You get the price from the solution provider, but it would be best to discuss it because nothing is set in stone regarding pricing."

"Infor M3 is a tier-two product and is cheaper than tier-one products such as SAP and Oracle. However, it is more expensive than some other tier-two products. The licensing cost is dependent on the number of users. Also, if you purchase other tools from Infor as a package, then there may be other discounts offered."

"The implementation costs of SAP is substantial."

"The product is expensive"

"The pricing model is based on an annual license."

"Regarding pricing, I don't regularly deal with the financial aspects, but it is not a cheap solution."

"People concerned about the costs need to evaluate whether implementing this system is profitable."

"SAP S4HANA is expensive and for smaller businesses, it is very difficult for them to have the budget."

"It's quite an expensive solution"

"It is on a quarterly basis. There are no additional costs. There is just the standard fee."

More SAP S/4HANA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	51
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	53

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infor M3?

The product's initial setup phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor M3?

Some customers expect more out-of-box reports, and in some areas, they should provide more reports. However, Infor has introduced a report tool so that key users or global champions can generate re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor M3?

Infor M3 is specifically dominant in fashion, food and beverages, and chemicals manufacturing; it works into micro-verticals. In food and beverage, it specializes in meat processing, confectionery,...

See all answers

Are there any advantages of SAP S4 HANA over SAP Business One (SAP B1) apart from the cost?

SaP Business One is a complete solution for business management. The software applications are broad, ranging from accounting to project management and human resources. It is very versatile and com...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP S4HANA?

My experience with SAP S_4HANA involves working on several projects helping customers prepare their transition from ECC to SAP S_4HANA. My role was to study the gap and technical feasibility by exe...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP ERP vs Infor M3

Compared 28% of the time

Infor LN vs Infor M3

Compared 15% of the time

Infor CloudSuite vs Infor M3

Compared 10% of the time

Infor Distribution SX.e vs Infor M3

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs Infor M3

Compared 4% of the time

More Infor M3 Competitors

SAP ERP vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 4% of the time

Odoo vs SAP S/4HANA

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP S/4HANA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3

March 2026

Download Infor M3 product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S/4HANA

March 2026

Download SAP S/4HANA product report

Also Known As

Infor Lawson M3, Lawson M3

SAP S4HANA

Overview

Infor M3 offers ultimate flexibility in operations, technology, and scale. As a multi-site, multi-country, and multi-company solution, M3 empowers your organization to adapt to changing business needs. It provides flexibility in managing mixed-mode and complex environments, with the agility to make quick adjustments at any time. Written in Java, M3 also gives you platform independence and choice.

Infor

SAP S4HANA is an ERP (enterprise resource planning) system that uses sophisticated technologies including machine learning and AI. It is most commonly used to integrate and manage business functions and is an ideal solution for large enterprises. The platform includes supplier relationship management (SRM), customer relationship management (CRM), supply chain management (SCM), and product lifecycle management (PLM) functionality.

SAP S4HANA offers three different deployment options:

On-premises
Cloud
Hybrid

SAP S4HANA Features

SAP S4HANA has many valuable key features, including:

Customizable
ERP, CRM, SRM, SCM, PLM co-deployed
High throughput
Fast analytics and reporting
Smaller total data footprint
SAP HANA multi-tenancy
All data: social, text, geo, graph, processing
New SAP Fiori UX for any device (mobile, desktop, tablet)
Unlimited workload capacity
High-volume transaction processing (OLTP)
High volume real-time analytical processes (OLAP)
Service Management
Digital Boardroom Integration

SAP S4HANA Benefits

Some of the benefits of using SAP S4HANA include:

Speed: S4 HANA applications leverage speed, context, and data accessibility to ensure you can stay up to date with rapidly evolving technology.

Improved performance: With SAP S4HANA, you can plan, execute, or generate reports and analytics based on live data to increase performance.

Simplicity: SAP S4HANA’s whole infrastructure was designed with simplification in mind — from the management of the solution to the administration of the IT landscape. The solution serves as the digital core for business process simplification and enables the centralizing of hardware and network resources.

Cost effective: SAP S4HANA is a cost effective solution. It provides the ability to bring together all the analytical and transactional capabilities of a variety of systems in one location, enabling better decision making.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by SAP S4HANA users.

A Mechanical Engineer at a construction company says, “It is a very powerful, highly customizable tool. The most valuable feature is that the reporting is fast. We can see the results from that in that our commissions come in fast. That is the main advantage.”

Another reviewer, a SAP Technology Manager at a financial services firm, mentions, "It is more or less a very, very smooth and seamless product. Day by day they are increasing their technology features and they are keen to resolve the issues. India has a complex business scenario and SAP is thinking about that and resolving the issues day by day. In terms of the features I have found most valuable, I don't think that there is any lack or any gap process-wise. SAP is a very good tool."

A Project and Service delivery Manager at a tech services company comments, "One of the most valuable features, which we used the most, was the FI module, for finance. It involved controlling, account receivables, account payables, and complete financial steering."

A Senior Architect at a construction company states, “The POD applications are very useful to us. There are a few POD apps which we are using for different business scenarios. They are quite interesting.” He also adds, “The initial setup is pretty straightforward. The documentation is very good. The solution can scale well. The solution is stable.”

SAP

Sample Customers

Grosfillex, High Five Sportswear, L_derach, OTK Group, PHS Group, Propper International, Red Wing Shoe Company, Reynolds Catering Supplies, Saudi Diesel, Sheetz, Zeppelin, Zodiac Aerospace

Nestle, O.C. Tanner, Sabre, New York Life Insurance Co., MEMEBOX, Siemens AG.

Buyer's Guide

Infor M3 vs. SAP S/4HANA

March 2026

Free Report: Infor M3 vs. SAP S/4HANA

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor M3 vs. SAP S/4HANA and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor M3 vs. SAP S/4HANA report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.