We performed a comparison between Enterworks Enable and Microsoft MDS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, TIBCO and others in Master Data Management (MDM) Software."Efficient management of multi-domain masters, product suppliers, and locations."
"Technical support is very good."
"The ease of use is valuable."
"What I like about Microsoft, is that it has a huge database with many users."
"It's very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the administration console."
"One of the main features I have found useful is the integration with Azure active directory."
"The tool is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft MDS is its management."
"As for improvement, the con is basically API integrations."
"Microsoft MDS isn't getting strong support because Microsoft is focusing more on cloud solutions."
"The stability could be improved."
"The only drawback is that it does not have the matching, merging, and all true MDM components. For these, you have to use another competent called Data Quality Services (DQS). You need to plug it in and use it along with MDS for true MDM. Both of these are integrated together, but you have to do them separately, whereas, in Profisee, there are a couple of screens where you can configure the matching process, create matching rules, and other things, and everything is in one product, which is not the case with MDS. In order to implement a true MDM, you need MDS, DQS, and SSIS. You have to use MDS to store your golden records, DQS to configure and standardize all your rules and matching percentages, and SSIS to load the data to DQS and MDS. At the same time, you also need Melissa Data to clean up your addresses to validate and standardize the addresses. That's the main component of true MDM. It would be good if they can create a true matching component inside MDS and merge MDS and DQS."
"In the next version, I would like to see integration with Azure."
"It would be a better option to have an on-cloud version."
"There are occasions when the solution maintains SD and we get duplications of MDS."
"Microsoft MDS' language should be simple so everyone can use it easily."
"JMD repositories have records that come in thousands and millions, which takes a long time to process."
Enterworks Enable is ranked 12th in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 2 reviews while Microsoft MDS is ranked 2nd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 18 reviews. Enterworks Enable is rated 5.6, while Microsoft MDS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Enterworks Enable writes "Efficient management of multi-domain masters but API integrations could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft MDS writes "Useful Excel plug-in, good scalability, and good integration with SQL Server and other Microsoft products". Enterworks Enable is most compared with Stibo STEP MDM, SAP Master Data Governance and Informatica MDM, whereas Microsoft MDS is most compared with Informatica MDM, Profisee, SAP Master Data Governance, Reltio Cloud and TIBCO EBX.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.