No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Enterworks Enable vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Enterworks Enable
Average Rating
5.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (14th)
Informatica Intelligent Dat...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
215
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (1st), Data Quality (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (6th), Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), API Management (5th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Data Governance (3rd), Test Data Management (2nd), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (1st), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (2nd), Data Masking (2nd), Metadata Management (2nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (3rd), Test Data Management Services (3rd), Product Information Management (PIM) (1st), Data Observability (2nd), AI Data Analysis (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Chandrakant Bharadwaj - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Data Management at Zeno Health
Efficient management of multi-domain masters but API integrations could be improved
As for improvement, the con is basically API integrations. I would like to have some improved API integrations in the future release. Moreover, there is room for improvement in the setup process. The company should move the deployment to the cloud and make it a ready setup. In the market, many of the players, like Trento, Semarchy, and MDM software which are on the cloud, are ready to use. All the installation is pre-defined so that the installation cost is not to be added by the client every time. So, deployment and installation are specific to the service partner only. A client cannot do it by themselves.
RC
Contractor at Sanlam
Cloud data catalog has streamlined lineage and quality while leaving more automation to improve
I have not explored IDMC's automation capabilities driven by AI and metadata too much at the moment, but it is on the cards. We are basically creating the foundation, as the whole migration has taken place recently and it is still early days. I think Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is evolving, and as the vendors move forward, they pick up new concepts from each other. I have seen that products leapfrog each other, and from my experience over the years, the big players tend to copy features or add enhancements based on industry trends. I feel whatever the tool does not have now, there is a feedback loop allowing us to request new features, and we continually ask for different ways to do things as we have a pipeline into the product management team. It is difficult to say what additional features I would prefer to see in the next release of IDMC. I would appreciate more automation on the lineage front, with more AI to seamlessly join independent sources and create seamless lineage between different technologies, such as from file into database A into a different database and landing up in a reporting system such as Cognos, Qlik, Qlik Sense, QlikView, or Power BI.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Efficient management of multi-domain masters, product suppliers, and locations."
"The feature that was most valuable to me was the ability to export files into .CSV format."
"Whether we need data cleansing or data mastering, we get it all in one platform."
"I think the integration feature is probably one of the key features in Informatica MDM...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It's a stable product without any bugs or glitches."
"The most valuable features of Informatica MDM are the IDQ and RDM data management."
"For the kind of application we have built and run on this tool, it has been very stable and has given consistent performance."
"The solution has improved our organization by providing data quality."
"It has been leading the market with hierarchy management and all the different match concepts and algorithms, and they're very robust."
 

Cons

"If a large file was imported/exported, or a lot of people were logged into the system, it would slow down and crash."
"As for improvement, the con is basically API integrations."
"I have encountered some issues using the substitution, which is one of the techniques of data masking."
"Once the data is masked, we won't be able to reverse it back to its original value."
"It could be improved by including a buffer that saves data when there is a connectivity issue."
"Informatica Enterprise Data Lake's setup process was complex since it doesn't support a lot of real-time systems."
"I would also like to have profiling functionalities and quality transformations in the cloud."
"The only thing that I can imagine that might be improved is how the available transactions verify addresses used. These transactions have a valid end date and must be used within the agreed timeframe."
"Certain shortcomings in the product's UI make it an area where improvements are required."
"I need to have some insight into the tool's cloud capabilities."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution is cost-effective."
"The solution is expensive."
"We pay for a yearly subscription."
"Informatica MDM's pricing is not cheap but comparable to other vendors."
"Its pricing model can be improved."
"I'm not sure about the most recent pricing trends, but I don't believe it's significantly different from PowerCenter. I believe it is nearly the same."
"It's pretty high for us. It's more on the higher side, like low to middle high."
"I rate Informatica MDM's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
"The price of Informatica Cloud Data Integration could be reduced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business51
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise155
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?
Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...
Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?
Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...
What are the biggest benefits of using Informatica Cloud Data Integration?
When it comes to cloud data integration, this solution can provide you with multiple benefits, including: Overhead reduction by integrating data on any cloud in various ways Effective integration ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, Address Verification, Persistent Data Masking
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ariens, Big Rock Sports, CPO Commerce, Creative Converting, Fender Musical Instruments, Guthy-Renker, Hearth & Home Technologies, HON Furniture, Interline Brands, Johnstone Supply, MARS/Heat Controller, Mary Kay, Mercer, Orgill, Owens & Minor, Publishers Clearing House, Safety Marketing Services, Synthes, Essendant, US Foods, W.B.Mason
The Travel Company, Carbonite
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Palantir and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: September 2026.
914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.