Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Elastic Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Elastic and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Elastic is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Seceon is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.4. Elastic holds a 4.7% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.
Elastic Security
Read 66 Elastic Security reviews
  • 10,861 Views
  • 7,060 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
Seceon Open Threat Manageme...
Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews
  • 1,209 Views
  • 1,185 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Elastic Security and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform are robust security solutions in the security sector. Seceon seems to have the upper hand due to advanced features and higher user satisfaction.

Features: Elastic Security users value comprehensive threat detection, cost-effectiveness, and customer support. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers AI-driven analytics, automatic threat mitigation, and advanced features, giving it a competitive edge.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Security needs better documentation, more intuitive configurations, and improved integrations. Seceon could enhance integration with third-party applications, reporting capabilities, and usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security is praised for straightforward deployment and prompt customer service. Seceon has a simple deployment process and receives high marks for the quality and responsiveness of its support team.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security is viewed as a lower-cost solution with solid ROI, catering to budget-conscious buyers. Seceon, being more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to superior features and higher user satisfaction in ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Security
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (7th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)
Seceon Open Threat Manageme...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
28th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Elastic Security is 4.7%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Elastic Security4.7%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform0.8%
Other94.5%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Laurentiu Popescu - PeerSpot reviewer
Has improved threat detection with deep log analysis and streamlined investigation workflows
The most useful features I find in Elastic Security are the forensic ones that allow us to carry deeper analysis into the logs for in-depth investigations, and the dashboards, with the reporting dashboard being quite user-friendly. Elastic Security is quite good at identifying threats, as it is part of the deep investigation tool that I mentioned before. Unless we need to look further into a certain log, we can carry out a deeper analysis and forensics on those particular logs. I can assess the impact of Elastic Security's real-time data analysis on our threat response efficiency as working pretty good. We are looking for real-time analysis because we have a continuous inflow of logs from different sources: from our cloud, from Active Directory, from our network. So it works pretty well.
Read full review
TamimKhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers
We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's very stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time."
"We chose the product based on the ability to scan for malware using a malware behavioral model as opposed to just a traditional hash-based antivirus. Therefore, it's not as intensive."
"The feature that we have found the most valuable is scalability."
"The solution is quite stable. The performance has been good."
"The most valuable thing is that this solution is widely used for work management and research. It's easy to jump into the security use case with the same technology."
"The cost is reasonable. It's not overly pricey."
"Enables monitoring of application performance and the ability to predict behaviors."
More Elastic Security pros
"The solution is stable."
"You can use different solutions in a single platform which is very easy and attractive for customers."
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."
"The main thing is the value proposition. It is one of the most sophisticated yet affordable solutions that I've come across. It is also one of the easiest-to-manage yet comprehensive solutions for a SOC analyst. Its customizations are really good, and it has a lot of integrations. It is multi-tenant and very fast to onboard. Its stability is 100%. We've never had an outage with it. It doesn't require extensive hardware resources. Its level of support is also very good. They have a very responsive technical team."
"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."
"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."
"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."
"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros
 

Cons

"There should be a simulation environment to check whether my Elastic implementation is functioning perfectly fine. Other solutions have their own Android and iOS applications that I can install on my mobile so that I am continuously connected to the SIEM."
"This solution cannot do predictive maintenance, so we have to build our own modules for doing it."
"I would like the process of retrieving archived data and viewing it in Kibana to be simplified."
"Elastic Security's maintenance is hard and its scalability is a challenge. There are complications in scaling and upgrading. The solution needs to also provide periodic upgrade checks."
"I would like more ways to manage permissions and restrict access to certain users."
"Installation is a little bit overwhelming, so improvements on the installation site could make it easier."
"If the documentation were improved and made more clear for beginners, or even professionals, then we would be more attracted to this solution."
"Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues."
More Elastic Security cons
"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."
"The product should improve the triggering rate."
"The management console could use some enhancements."
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform sells some add-ons as part of the whole suite but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially attract more business."
"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."
"The dashboard has always been an issue."
"Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth."
"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is free."
"I can say that the product is cheaply priced."
"Affordable but with additional costs"
"When compared to other products, the price is average or on the low side."
"This is an open-source product, so there are no costs."
"We use the open-source version, so there is no charge for this solution."
"Compared to other tools, Elastic Security is a cheaper solution."
"The solution is not expensive and costs around ten dollars a month."
More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice
"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."
"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."
"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."
"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."
"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."
"The price is quite reasonable."
"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...
See all answers
What do you like most about Elastic Security?
Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?
I am satisfied with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing cost. It is a pure 10.
See all answers
What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?
There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Elastic Security Logo
Wazuh vs Elastic Security
Compared 13% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security
Compared 7% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security
Compared 7% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elastic Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Elastic Security
Compared 5% of the time
More Elastic Security Competitors
IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 12% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 12% of the time
DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 11% of the time
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 11% of the time
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Elastic Security
November 2025
Elastic Security reportDownload Elastic Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
October 2025
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reportDownload Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash
Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management
 

Overview

Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.


Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

  • The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
  • It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
  • With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response. 

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis. 

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates. 

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon
 

Sample Customers

Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care
Caduceus, SUNY
Buyer's Guide
Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
September 2025
Free Report: Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Elastic Security vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.