Elastic Search vs SingleStore comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Elastic Logo
2,118 views|712 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
SingleStore Logo
166 views|131 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Elastic Search and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Vector Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Search vs. SingleStore Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You have dashboards, it is visual, there are maps, you can create canvases. It's more visual than anything that I've ever used.""The product is scalable with good performance.""The initial installation and setup were straightforward.""The most valuable feature for us is the analytics that we can configure and view using Kibana.""The most valuable feature of Elastic Enterprise Search is the opportunity to search behind and between different logs.""Implementing the main requirements regarding my support portal​.""We can easily collect all the data and view historical trends using the product. We can view the applications and identify the issues effectively.""It is stable."

More Elastic Search Pros →

"The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines.""The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.""MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short.""The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms.""It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data.""The product's initial setup phase was pretty straightforward, with no complex processes."

More SingleStore Pros →

Cons
"Better dashboards or a better configuration system would be very good.""It needs email notification, similar to what Logentries has. Because of the notification issue, we moved to Logentries, as it provides a simple way to receive notification whenever a server encounters an error or unexpected conditions (which we have defined using RegEx​).""Elastic Enterprise Search could improve the report templates.""I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. We faced a few issues.""It was not possible to use authentication three years back. You needed to buy the product's services for authentication.""The solution must provide AI integrations.""It is hard to learn and understand because it is a very big platform. This is the main reason why we still have nothing in production. We have to learn some things before we get there.""We have an issue with the volume of data that we can handle."

More Elastic Search Cons →

"For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback.""Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally.""Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial.""We don't get good discounts in Pakistan.""The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings.""There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great.""It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks."

More SingleStore Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."
  • "SingleStore is a bit expensive."
  • "The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."
  • "Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."
  • "The price of the product is okay compared to the other available solutions in the market. SingleStore is a reasonably priced product, considering the functions it offers."
  • "They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."
  • More SingleStore Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Top Answer:The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.
    Top Answer:Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure. While building an on-premise cluster incurs an initial cost for servers with ample RAM… more »
    Top Answer:There's a noteworthy consideration when it comes to collecting massive amounts of data. It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    2,118
    Comparisons
    712
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.3
    10th
    out of 21 in Vector Databases
    Views
    166
    Comparisons
    131
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    607
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Faiss logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Teradata logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    SingleStore
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    The SingleStore platform combines transactional, analytical, and vector data workloads in a real-time, unified, distributed SQL database that is MySQL and MongoDB wire protocol-compatible. SingleStore also combines the capabilities of traditional databases with the scalability of the cloud, making it suitable for a range of data-driven applications.

    SingleStore provides a unified platform that supports both transactional and analytical workloads, enabling real-time data processing and analysis. It is optimized for speed, offering low-latency data access and high throughput. The platform's distributed architecture allows it to scale horizontally, handling large volumes of data across multiple nodes. Additionally, it supports SQL, making it accessible for users familiar with standard query languages.

    Key features of SingleStore include real-time data ingestion, which allows for the immediate processing of incoming data, and a fully distributed SQL execution engine that enhances performance. The platform also offers in-memory rowstore and disk-based columnstore, providing flexibility in data storage and retrieval methods. Furthermore, SingleStore ensures high availability and disaster recovery with its multi-cloud, multi-region deployment options.

    When evaluating SingleStore, you should consider its ability to reduce query response times significantly, improve operational efficiencies with real-time analytics, and lower infrastructure costs through efficient resource utilization. Additionally, the platform's support for mixed workloads enables businesses to streamline their data operations, reducing the need for multiple specialized databases.

    SingleStore is implemented across various industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it helps with real-time risk analysis and fraud detection. In healthcare, it supports advanced analytics for patient data management. Retailers use SingleStore to optimize supply chain operations and personalize customer experiences through real-time data insights.

    Pricing for SingleStore is based on a subscription model, with costs determined by the resources allocated and the level of support required. It offers flexible licensing options to accommodate different business needs. SingleStore's customer support is known for its responsiveness and expertise, providing users with the necessary assistance to maximize the platform's potential.

    In summary, SingleStore offers a versatile and efficient cloud database solution suitable for handling diverse data workloads with high performance and scalability.

    Sample Customers
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    6Sense, Adobe, Akamai, CARFAX, Cigna, Cisco, Comcast, DBS Bank, Dell, GE, Goldman Sachs, Heap, Hulu, IMAX, Kakao, Kroger, LiveRamp, Lumana, NBC, Outreach, Palo Alto Networks, Siemens, SiriusXM, SK Telecom, SKAI, Sony, STC, TATA, and ZoomInfo.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Elastic Search vs. SingleStore
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Search vs. SingleStore and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Vector Databases with 59 reviews while SingleStore is ranked 10th in Vector Databases with 7 reviews. Elastic Search is rated 8.2, while SingleStore is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SingleStore writes "A reasonably priced product that offers good speed and seamless support". Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone, Azure Search and Amazon Kendra, whereas SingleStore is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, Teradata, CockroachDB and Oracle Database. See our Elastic Search vs. SingleStore report.

    See our list of best Vector Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.