Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Elastic Observability vs i-Vertix Log & Data Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability
Ranking in Log Management
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th)
i-Vertix Log & Data Management
Ranking in Log Management
83rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Subramani K - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 27, 2022
The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed.
So Elastic is basically clusters, right? Basically three, we can go with the basic cluster is a three note cluster. So the implementation is quite simple. It's not very complex. So we have to architect the solution in such a way that we have the right number of replicas and right number of charts and all those to hold the data. So basically we have to architect based on the data ingestion, how much data we are going to ingest in the cluster. So this setup is pretty simple, but we have to have the right inputs, right decisions in place before we even implement it.
Use i-Vertix Log & Data Management?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."
"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."
"It is expensive. It is not cheap."
"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."
"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."
"The product is not that cheap."
"We will buy a premium license after POC."
"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
807,508 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?
Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...
What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?
I don't know how Elastic can improve. The integration feature I am using is very easy to implement.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Airbus 5. Amazon 6. American Express 7. Aon 8. ATT 9. Autodesk 10. Bank of America 11. Barclays 12. BASF 13. Bayer 14. BlackRock 15. Boeing 16. BNP Paribas 17. Cisco 18. Coca-Cola 19. Comcast 20. Dell 21. Deutsche Bank 22. eTrade 23. ExxonMobil 24. Ford 25. GE 26. Google 27. HP 28. IBM 29. Intel 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kraft Heinz 32. Lockheed Martin
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: September 2024.
807,508 professionals have used our research since 2012.