Eggplant Test vs TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) comparison

Eggplant Test vs. TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Download the complete report

Helped 884,328 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaT...

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.3%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is 2.6%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
LambdaTest	2.6%
Eggplant Test	4.3%
Other	93.1%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Karine Kirche

Practice Specialist at a government with 1-10 employees

Cloud-based testing has simplified remote mobile validation and provides flexible device coverage

I was not impressed with how detailed their analytics and logs are from LambdaTest. The solution we were testing is being used because many of us are working from home. It was easy to implement because with a real phone, we have to bring a real phone to each person. Since three years ago, many employees have been working from home, so we were trying to find a solution for this challenge. We had no need to exploit the information for the analytics generated in the background. The purpose was simply to make it easy for our employees to access a phone. The downsides I noticed include that the pricing was very good, but the visual quality of the image sometimes suffers. The contrast on a real iPhone provides better contrast than with the cloud solution. The only aspect that was less favorable than on a real phone was the contrast of the color.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"The solution is a stable one."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

More Eggplant Test pros

"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

"The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."

"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."

"HyperExecute adds significant speed to execution, enhancing the overall testing process."

"I was really surprised by LambdaTest; it was a very good service and for the price, I think it is a very good solution."

"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."

"We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring."

More TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) pros

Cons

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"There was no free trial in it."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."

More Eggplant Test cons

"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

More TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

More TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,328 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 5% of the time

BrowserStack vs Eggplant Test

Compared 2% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

BrowserStack vs TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Compared 32% of the time

Sauce Labs vs TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Compared 13% of the time

Perfecto vs TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Compared 5% of the time

SeleniumBox (SBOX) vs TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Compared 2% of the time

More TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Competitors

Product Reports

Eggplant Test

Download Eggplant Test product report

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Download TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

TestMu AI, formerly LambdaTest, facilitates real-time testing across 2,000+ browser and OS combinations. It supports geolocation and parallel testing, CI/CD tool integration, and provides intuitive UI, enhancing compatibility checks and quick onboarding through robust documentation.

Offering extensive browser options and vast device support, TestMu AI enhances testing efficiency with automation and Docker tunnel integration. Its responsive support team aids in accessing legacy browsers and OS, ensuring comprehensive compatibility checks. While users desire improvements in dashboard analytics, native app testing, and performance under heavy loads, there's a high demand for features like real device testing and expanded integrations. As a tool for ensuring cross-browser compatibility and responsive design, TestMu AI is instrumental in testing websites across browsers and operating systems, thus aiding in seamless user experiences. Organizations leverage automation and scalability for quicker test executions, with the platform's integration capabilities crucial for detecting UI issues, improving code quality, and streamlining testing processes.

What are the standout features of TestMu AI?

Real-Time Testing: Access to over 2,000 browser and OS combinations.
Geolocation Testing: Conduct tests with location-specific configurations.
Parallel Testing: Run multiple tests simultaneously for efficiency.
CI/CD Integrations: Compatibility with Jenkins and GitLab for seamless workflow.
Docker Tunnel Integration: Enhance automation and testing speed.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Extensive Device Support: Gain access to legacy and modern browsers and OS.
Responsive Support Team: Quickly resolve issues with expert assistance.
Robust Documentation: Facilitate rapid platform onboarding.
Comprehensive Compatibility: Ensure wide-range compatibility checks on various platforms.

In industries focused on digital presence, TestMu AI is vital for companies testing websites on diverse browsers to ensure seamless performance and user satisfaction. It aids in cross-device testing, addressing consumer needs by integrating into CI/CD pipelines for faster, automated detection of UI inconsistencies and code improvements.

TestMu AI

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Eggplant Test vs. TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)