Eggplant Test vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

Keysight Technologies and Inflectra are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Inflectra is ranked #21 with an average rating of 4.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.9% mindshare in TAt, compared to Inflectra’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 18 Eggplant Test reviews

3,807 Views
2,436 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

459 Views
170 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Inflectra Rapise and Eggplant Test are competitors in the test automation space, each with distinct strengths. Based on comparisons, Inflectra Rapise is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and support, while Eggplant Test is chosen for its advanced features.

Features: Inflectra Rapise supports various applications, integrates easily into development environments, and has a user-friendly scripting interface. Eggplant Test offers AI-driven testing, enables cross-platform testing, and excels in feature depth and innovation.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could improve feature depth for large-scale enterprise use, enhance customization capabilities, and offer a broader scope of AI features. Eggplant Test may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, lowering initial costs, and expanding intuitive user support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise is easy to deploy, supported by strong customer service. Eggplant Test, although more complex to set up due to customization options, provides specialized customer service for enterprise-level needs.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise offers lower setup costs, yielding a faster ROI attractive to budget-sensitive organizations. In contrast, Eggplant Test, with a higher initial investment, offers value through extensive features and scalability, appealing to those seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th)

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.9%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Tayyaba Noreen

Student at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability

There was no free trial in it. So, I studied it through a page that tells how it works. It will be good if a free trial is provided for users. Moreover, I would like to give some feedback on the installation process. There are other tools that are much easier to install and get started with. Eggplant could improve its installation process.

Read full review

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"Good text reading ability."

"It is easy to set up."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

More Eggplant Test pros

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

Cons

"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"There was no free trial in it."

More Eggplant Test cons

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Manager?

The solution is a stable one.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 20% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

August 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

August 2025

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Rapise

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?

Inflectra

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

July 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.