Eggplant Test vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

Keysight Technologies and Inflectra are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.3, while Inflectra is ranked #26. Keysight Technologies holds a 4.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Inflectra’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,848 Views
2,617 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

1,317 Views
566 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Inflectra Rapise and Eggplant Test are major contenders in the software testing tools segment. Inflectra Rapise leads in pricing and support, while Eggplant Test dominates with its advanced features for comprehensive testing solutions.

Features: Inflectra Rapise includes a versatile automation framework, transparency in supporting multiple platforms, and strong scriptless testing options. Eggplant Test features AI-driven testing enhancing cross-platform compatibility, robust image recognition, and optical character recognition, making it ideal for complex systems.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could enhance its AI capabilities, improve cross-platform support, and expand scriptless testing features. Eggplant Test may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, optimizing setup speed, and improving user interface clarity for better ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise offers a straightforward deployment model with direct support channels ensuring an easier setup. Eggplant Test, though more complex to deploy, provides comprehensive support with detailed documentation, ideal for navigating intricate testing environments.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise is budget-friendly, offering competitive pricing for small to mid-sized projects with quick ROI. Eggplant Test, although higher in cost, offers features that promise significant long-term ROI especially for larger organizations with demanding testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (42nd), AI Quality Assurance (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.3%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 1.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Eggplant Test	4.3%
Inflectra Rapise	1.2%
Other	94.5%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"It is easy to set up."

"Prior to using the product, all regression testing was done manually for our POS system, and now regression test packs are 70% automated."

"The best feature of Eggplant Test is that it's very easy to use; you just capture those pictures of the objects in your application and it's easy to automate."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool, we have been satisfied with the tool, and not only the tool, but the service behind it, as the tool works as expected and the response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"Good text reading ability."

More Eggplant Test pros

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The scripting of this tool is easy and user friendly."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"The first time I used Rapise I completed the automation scripts for a full application in a day and I was shocked how easy it was."

"Rapise is a good automation tool that's easy to use and learn, and you can share scripts as a team, which is very helpful."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"We saved thousands of dollars because the Rapise implementation gave us 30 or more executions for every release compared to three or four, so huge savings on manual testing effort plus easy detection of defects is very cost effective."

Cons

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"eggPlants data input is text based and does not easily conform to data driven test, and this makes data management painful."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

More Eggplant Test cons

"I faced one problem where it can't validate the colour of images and text. Also, it could not automate the mobile app, and this needs to be included."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"When there are failures in a nightly run of batches of scripts, it can create a blocking situation where all the following scripts will fail due to unexpected results."

"It has some stability issues where the tool crashes sometimes on Windows 10."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"What I have noticed about Rapise is that sometimes when you keep on using the same script, it fails many times."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

LEAPWORK vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

March 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

March 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Rapise

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

March 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.