Eggplant Test vs Inflectra Rapise comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Keysight Technologies and Inflectra are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0, while Inflectra is ranked #23. Keysight Technologies holds a 2.9% mindshare in TAt, compared to Inflectra’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Inflectra users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

6,495 Views
4,027 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

4,005 Views
1,602 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Inflectra Rapise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Inflectra Rapise and Eggplant Test are major contenders in the software testing tools segment. Inflectra Rapise leads in pricing and support, while Eggplant Test dominates with its advanced features for comprehensive testing solutions.

Features: Inflectra Rapise includes a versatile automation framework, transparency in supporting multiple platforms, and strong scriptless testing options. Eggplant Test features AI-driven testing enhancing cross-platform compatibility, robust image recognition, and optical character recognition, making it ideal for complex systems.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could enhance its AI capabilities, improve cross-platform support, and expand scriptless testing features. Eggplant Test may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, optimizing setup speed, and improving user interface clarity for better ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise offers a straightforward deployment model with direct support channels ensuring an easier setup. Eggplant Test, though more complex to deploy, provides comprehensive support with detailed documentation, ideal for navigating intricate testing environments.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise is budget-friendly, offering competitive pricing for small to mid-sized projects with quick ROI. Eggplant Test, although higher in cost, offers features that promise significant long-term ROI especially for larger organizations with demanding testing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (12th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (16th)

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (39th), AI Quality Assurance (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 2.9%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Eggplant Test	2.9%
Inflectra Rapise	1.5%
Other	95.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"These days I use only Eggplant since it is very easy to use, especially in the function test, and in the UI test, and it's better than other tools."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"It is easy to set up."

"Good text reading ability."

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"We took a two and a half week regression process and cut it down to almost two days of automation, which is pretty awesome and makes Eggplant probably one of the best tools on the market for GUI automation."

More Eggplant Test pros

"The scripting of this tool is easy and user friendly."

"The first time I used Rapise I completed the automation scripts for a full application in a day and I was shocked how easy it was."

"The initial setup was straightforward; it wasn't complex at all, and we found it nice and easy."

"Rapise is a good automation tool that's easy to use and learn, and you can share scripts as a team, which is very helpful."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We saved thousands of dollars because the Rapise implementation gave us 30 or more executions for every release compared to three or four, so huge savings on manual testing effort plus easy detection of defects is very cost effective."

"It's incredible but the support and maintenance of Inflectra Rapise's scripts is less than 30% of the effort that was involved in maintaining Selenium, it is very easy and this is the reason that we are switching everything that needs handling from Selenium to Inflectra Rapise, as it is easy to maintain and provides a benefit in cost and efforts with a 90% reduction factor in the maintenance of the scripts."

More Inflectra Rapise pros

Cons

"The solution would crash from time to time."

"The biggest issue I had was the crashing. You could be in the middle of setting up and writing up a nice little script and then it would crash."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution."

"We were not able to write code as fast as with the competing open-source software, so that needs to be improved."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured."

"It has low productivity."

"If somebody asks me, "Is it possible, from the first moment, that somebody who has never used Eggplant can create actions?" I must answer, "No, it is not possible.""

More Eggplant Test cons

"What I have noticed about Rapise is that sometimes when you keep on using the same script, it fails many times."

"I faced one problem where it can't validate the colour of images and text. Also, it could not automate the mobile app, and this needs to be included."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"It has some stability issues where the tool crashes sometimes on Windows 10."

"The maintenance is very difficult."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"When there are failures in a nightly run of batches of scripts, it can create a blocking situation where all the following scripts will fail due to unexpected results."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

19%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 3% of the time

XASSURE vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 3% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

October 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

October 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Rapise

Overview

Eggplant Test stands out with its AI-driven and image recognition features, facilitating quick bug detection across multiple systems. Its ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes it a top choice for efficient and comprehensive testing solutions.

Offering OCR, image recognition, and extensive AI capabilities, Eggplant Test enhances automation and reduces testing time. Known for its versatility, it operates independently from system constraints and supports scriptless testing. With a user-centric design, the tool integrates with platforms like GitHub and operates on diverse operating systems. Despite advancements, considerations include its affordability, installation complexities, and need for better text recognition and stability. Its success is bolstered by seamless scripting, robust reporting features, and the option for digital twin utilization, making it ideal for real-world user action simulations.

What are the most important features of Eggplant Test?

OCR and Image Recognition: Facilitates efficient bug detection and automated testing.
AI Capabilities: Enhances testing efficiency with intelligent automation.
Cross-Platform Operation: Compatible with various operating systems.
Integration Options: Connects easily with GitHub and other platforms.
Scriptless Testing: Simplifies testing for users with limited coding skills.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Testing Time: Achieves faster testing cycles through automation.
Improved Quality Assurance: Enhances reliability with refined testing methods.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and operation for users.
Robust Reporting: Offers comprehensive insights into test outcomes.

Industries utilize Eggplant Test primarily for regression and GUI automation testing, especially in desktop applications. Its capacity for post-development validation and vulnerability scanning supports businesses with testers having minimal coding experience. Deployed on virtual machines, it effectively tests web pages, Windows apps, and streaming devices, simulating real-world user actions efficiently. Eggplant Test's role in simplifying robotic process automation and functional testing is significant, offering a spectrum of operational support across varied sectors.

Keysight Technologies

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

September 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Inflectra Rapise report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.