Aug 28, 2023
If we talk just about performance, Spark will be faster. ) But Spring and Spark are completely different products. Please, share additional info about data pipelines in your project.
Apache Spark and Spring Boot compete in the software tools category, with Spark excelling in data processing and Spring Boot in rapid application development. Apache Spark has the upper hand in data processing features and scalability, while Spring Boot stands out in application deployment efficiency due to its streamlined architecture.
Features: Apache Spark enables efficient large-scale data processing through features like in-memory computing, which reduces latency, and Spark Streaming, for real-time data handling. It also supports comprehensive data analysis with Spark SQL and distributed machine learning via MLlib. Spring Boot simplifies application development, especially in microservices, through seamless integration with Java technologies and provides essential features for creating scalable web applications and REST APIs.
Room for Improvement: Apache Spark could further enhance its user interface and improve integration with data science platforms to better manage resources. Further improvements are suggested in its memory handling and documentation. Spring Boot could benefit from better integration with cloud services and simplified security configurations, along with more beginner-friendly documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Spark is versatile in deployment, capable of running on any infrastructure, from on-premises setups to public clouds. It mainly relies on community support and documentation from Hadoop vendors. Spring Boot offers flexible deployment options and provides detailed support, particularly suitable for commercial environments, with a more structured support system than Spark.
Pricing and ROI: Both Apache Spark and Spring Boot are open-source, offering cost-effective solutions. Apache Spark may incur infrastructure or third-party support costs, while Spring Boot remains free unless professional or enterprise features are needed. Spark is noted for lowering operational costs significantly, while Spring Boot offers savings through efficient development and deployment processes. The ROI for both can be substantial depending on effective implementation.
Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory
Spring Boot is a tool that makes developing web applications and microservices with the Java Spring Framework faster and easier, with minimal configuration and setup. By using Spring Boot, you avoid all the manual writing of boilerplate code, annotations, and complex XML configurations. Spring Boot integrates easily with other Spring products and can connect with multiple databases.
How Spring Boot improves Spring Framework
Java Spring Framework is a popular, open-source framework for creating standalone applications that run on the Java Virtual Machine.
Although the Spring Framework is powerful, it still takes significant time and knowledge to configure, set up, and deploy Spring applications. Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal configuration of Spring Framework with three important capabilities.
Reviews from Real Users
Spring Boot stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its autoconfiguration feature, which allows users to start developing applications in a minimal amount of time.
A system analyst and team lead at a tech services company writes, “Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated. For data analysis and data mining, you can use a custom API and integrate your application. That's an advanced feature. For data managing and other things, you can get that custom from a third-party API. That is also a free license.”
Randy M., A CEO at Modal Technologies Corporation, writes, “I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products. Spring Security facilitates the handling of standard security measures. The Spring Boot annotations make it easy to handle routing for microservices and to access request and response objects. Other annotations included with Spring Boot enable move away from XML configuration.”
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
