Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) comparison

Dotcom-Monitor and OpenText are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Dotcom-Monitor is ranked #20, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Dotcom-Monitor holds a 0.4% mindshare in LTT, compared to OpenText’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dotcom-Monitor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...
Read 3 Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reviews
  • 117 Views
  • 59 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 13, 2025

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering LoadRunner Enterprise and Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing are competitors in performance testing. LoadRunner Enterprise has the advantage due to its extensive features and flexibility for detailed load testing, making it suitable for organizations with complex needs.

Features: LoadRunner Enterprise offers advanced integrations, robust scripting, and comprehensive analytics capabilities. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView provides simplicity, ease of simulating various user environments, and hassle-free scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView's cloud-based setup reduces installation complexity, paired with exceptional customer support for fast issue resolution. LoadRunner Enterprise requires more time and resources for deployment but is assisted by supportive documentation and resources.

Pricing and ROI: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView has competitive pricing with quick ROI due to cost-effective subscription plans and low cloud-based overhead. LoadRunner Enterprise, while more costly upfront, offers high ROI for large organizations with significant testing capability investments compared to LoadView's budget-friendly options.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
20th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Enterprise Perform...
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 5.3%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Load Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1631949 - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up
It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.
Read full review
VictorHorescu - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to test almost every tool in the companies I enter and performs well in a distributed environment
It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems. In real time, when they ask for 5,000 or 10,000 concurrent users, I have to provision a lot of virtual machines to define this load. Then there are situations with certain platforms, especially document management platforms, where the technology is so weird that normal LoadRunner protocols cannot detect it. So, in that case, I have to use that special TruClient protocol. I have to use the TruClient protocol, which actually clicks on the object. Despite the SQL technology, I can still create a script and test for performance. So what I would appreciate a lot is if this protocol would require less resources on a normal virtual machine. I can use fewer concurrent users with TruClient protocols as opposed to almost one hundred with HTTP/HTML. As opposed to many more with HTTP/HTML from, let's say, JMeter. So, optimization at that level for resource consumption by OpenText would be much appreciated.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The pricing is reasonable."
"It offers easy integration with third-party tools like Dynatrace, Splunk, etc."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."
"What we call the LoadRunner analysis is the most useful aspect of the solution."
"It's a very powerful tool."
"LoadRunner Enterprise's best feature is the detailed reporting structure."
"The user interface is fine."
"It allows you to work out how well you are doing project-wise because you see the number of scripts done, the number of tests run, and whether you have mapped all your requirements to it."
"It has offered me some reliability against other products, like JMeter or some other tools."
More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros
 

Cons

"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."
"OpenText needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated."
"They had wanted to change the GUI to improve the look and feel. However, since that time, we see a lot of hanging issues."
"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."
"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."
"We'd like the product to include protocol identifiers whenever a tester wants to test a new application."
"It is tough to maintain from the infrastructure side."
"It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems."
"It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us."
More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."
"The price of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise could improve, it is expensive."
"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."
"We used the Professional version and then moved to the enterprise version. We have subscribed to 1000 user licenses. The tool will be super expensive if we take up 5,000 user licenses. We have to limit ourselves on testing."
"The tool is very expensive."
"For Performance Center, you have to add additional load generators, and then you can do more. I think it is a matter of the price, in terms of how many machines you can buy."
"The solution should decrease its price."
"I have not been directly involved in price negotiations but my understanding is that while the cost is a little bit high, it provides good value for the money."
"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."
More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
19%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
In 2019, I was dealing with the costs of LoadRunner. While I don't remember the exact figures, JMeter being free and RPT being cheaper makes them attractive. The high cost of LoadRunner, in contras...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?
While I don't see any issues with LoadRunner's functionality, the cost of the tool is a major factor. Many of my customers have had to switch to different tools due to the cost of LoadRunner, despi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Logo
Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing
Compared 100% of the time
More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Competitors
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Logo
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
Compared 34% of the time
OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Logo
OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
Compared 21% of the time
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Logo
Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
Compared 8% of the time
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
Compared 8% of the time
Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Logo
Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
Compared 7% of the time
More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Load Testing Tools
March 2025
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reportDownload Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
April 2025
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reportDownload OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report
 

Also Known As

LoadView Stress Testing
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center
 

Overview

LoadView provides scalable external load testing using real browsers. Spin up virtual machines in the Amazon, Google or Rackspace clouds without having to manage cloud accounts. Record scripts and run stress tests on demand. Learn more at https://www.loadview-testing.com
Dotcom-Monitor

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.

Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.

What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?
  • Reporting Capabilities: Offers detailed and customizable reports for insightful data analysis.
  • Scalability: Supports testing with thousands of concurrent users for robust application performance validation.
  • Integration Features: Provides seamless integration options for a cohesive testing environment.
  • Global Execution: Enables worldwide test execution with ease and flexibility.
  • Protocol Support: Accommodates a wide range of protocols for versatile application testing.
What benefits should users expect from using OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?
  • Improved Performance Metrics: Detailed insights into application stability and performance.
  • Cost Management: Particularly with enhanced AWS integration, helps manage infrastructure costs.
  • Industry Versatility: Applicable across sectors like banking, healthcare, and retail.
  • Flexibility: Adapts to cloud, web, and ERP applications with robust scripting and testing options.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
Buyer's Guide
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
April 2025
Free Report: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
Find out what your peers are saying about Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.