We performed a comparison between Apache JMeter and Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."User-friendly and open source."
"The solution helps by detecting bottlenecks."
"It's open source, so I like that about the product. And there's a lot of community support for it."
"The most valuable features are the integration with Jenkins and the reporting."
"We like that Apache JMeter has different features and different plugins and that they are free of charge."
"It is cost-effective and simple to use."
"It's easy to set up."
"We are using this for performance testing and some automation."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"Its reporting could be improved. There should be a better visual representation. That would be helpful for easy consumption of the reports."
"The memory utilization in JMeter is very poor."
"We would like some reporting and analysis tools to be added to this solution."
"JMeter's reporting is extremely rudimentary. The fundamental reporting mechanisms need to be drastically improved. It doesn't utilize an automatic session management mechanism or methods other tools use like parsing cookies and variables. Everything needs to be done manually. There's no automation."
"Improving JMeter's sync time would be beneficial."
"The user interface is a little bit tricky."
"Running JMeter in GUI mode uses a lot of memory, which means we need to switch to a non-GUI mode when using a heavy load."
"The interface could be made more user-friendly."
"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."
More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Load Testing Tools with 82 reviews while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is ranked 16th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.8, while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "It's a free tool with a vast knowledge base, but the reporting is lackluster, and it has a steep learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing writes "User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up". Apache JMeter is most compared with BlazeMeter, Postman, Tricentis NeoLoad, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and Katalon Studio, whereas Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is most compared with .
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.