Devo vs Securonix Next-Gen SIEM comparison

Devo and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #36, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1. Devo holds a 1.1% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 22 Devo reviews

2,625 Views
1,811 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Read 35 Securonix Next-Gen SIEM reviews

5,240 Views
3,773 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Devo

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM and Devo compete in the SIEM market, with Devo having the upper hand due to its feature set and user satisfaction despite higher costs.

Features: Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers advanced analytics, threat detection capabilities, and strong customer support. Devo provides comprehensive data ingestion, processing features, and overall user satisfaction, making its extensive data handling capabilities particularly valuable.

Room for Improvement: Securonix Next-Gen SIEM needs better integration with third-party tools, improved performance during high traffic, and enhancements in its user interface. Devo could improve querying capabilities, visualization tools, and the consistency of its documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is noted for its smooth deployment process and excellent customer service. Devo's deployment is straightforward, though feedback on customer service responsiveness is mixed.

Pricing and ROI: Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers competitive setup costs and good return on investment. Devo, despite being more expensive, is considered worth the premium due to its robust functionality and positive impact on ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

36th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (44th), IT Operations Analytics (10th), AIOps (19th)

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM	1.1%
Devo	1.1%
Other	97.8%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Has cloud-first architecture with SIEM technology to run security operations

When it comes to scale, they're architected quite well. They handle some of the biggest customers globally, with significant throughput on their platform, managing thousands of customers. One of the most impressive aspects of Devo is its customer community. A large majority, over 80 percent of their customers, actively participate on a Devo-specific community page. They're contributing to product development and support, events, and user group information, helping each other out. This high level of engagement is rare and demonstrates both the loyalty of their customer base and the quality of their product. They offer a range of small, medium, and large options to cater to everyone. I sold Devo products while working with them, focusing on enterprise solutions. However, as a small reseller, my customers were typically smaller businesses. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Mohammed Nadeem Rais

Lead - Cyber Security at NMC Healthcare

The visibility and analytics from Securonix SIEM have become indispensable in identifying and stopping potential threats before they escalate.

The most valuable feature of Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is its advance analytics, flexibility and scalability. We ingest billions of logs without worrying about resource allocation. This makes it a robust and cost-effective solution for our needs. Its user entity and behavior analytics (UEBA) are also integral for detecting insider threats and lateral movements within the organization. These features help organizations strengthen their security posture, protect sensitive data, and maintain compliance with strict regulatory requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

"Devo provides a multi-tenant, cloud-native architecture. This is critical for managed service provider environments or multinational organizations who may have subsidiaries globally. It gives organizations a way to consolidate their data in a single accessible location, yet keep the data separate. This allows for global views and/or isolated views restricted by access controls by company or business unit."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events."

"It's very, very versatile."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

More Devo pros

"One of the most valuable features is the integration of all types of data sources to extract relevant information regarding events. It is a good solution when it comes to the correlations that it makes within all the data handled in our company."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is their analytics platform where they have the open security data-link, which they introduced. This is typically different from the other vendors."

"[The solution has] incident-management or case-management functionality. If someone were to download a high number and we decided we needed to investigate it, I could open a case right in the tool. It would be able to directly reference the data that they downloaded and we could open and shut the case directly in the tool, as well as report from it."

"The solution has proven to be stable so far...The solution is easy to scale up."

"SNYPR has a bundle of features. It has the UEBA feature that tells you about the behavior of a person or entity. In the tool itself, there is an incident management feature, which is definitely valuable."

"The solution's AI features reduce the need for manual analysis and help in decision-making. It displays the report in seconds. It saves my resources three to four hours of work."

"There aren't any positive aspects of the solution. It was a complete failure. There are no redeeming features."

"We can select the resource group name or functionality directly of which type of security tool logs we want. We don't need to write the query for that; we just have to select."

More Securonix Next-Gen SIEM pros

Cons

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"There are some issues from an availability and functionality standpoint, meaning the tool is somewhat slow. There were some slow response periods over the past six to nine months, though it has yet to impact us terribly as we are a relatively small shop. We've noticed it, however, so Devo could improve the responsiveness."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

More Devo cons

"One of the things they can improve on a little bit is the usability side, to make some things simpler... The tool does have a lot of knobs, you can turn a lot of things on and off and you can change things. Sometimes, it can become a little overwhelming. They should remove some confirmation options and make it simpler for the less mature customers and people who are still trying to grasp it."

"Parsing needs to be improved. Every time we integrate a new, specific data source, we face a lot of problems in parsing, even for the old data source."

"Sometimes, there is instability in the data in terms of the customization of the time. I have sometimes observed discrepancies in the data, which is something they should work on. They should bring more stability to time customization. If we are seeing a particular data, when we change the time zone, there should be the same data. There should not be any discrepancy."

"Sometimes, the injectors lag and are not loading. It would be nice if that could be improved."

"When they did upgrades or applied patches, sometimes, there was downtime, which required the backfill of data. There were times when we had to reach out and get a lot of things validated."

"Securonix implements risk scores based on different policies that are triggered. We've seen some challenges with the risk scores and how they trigger. These are things that Securonix has recognized and they've been working with us to help improve things."

"It could be improved a little bit more for admin users. There should be more administrative options related to security for admin users. For example, for forensic purposes, the admin should be able to stop a specific user from erasing some information. I would be helpful in certain situations, such as during an internal fraud."

"When dealing with a large amount of data, such as when firewall logs increase, queries sometimes crash or get stuck."

More Securonix Next-Gen SIEM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"A good thing about Securonix is that they don't charge by volume of data or number of devices... They charge by the number of employees, which is a much more predictable number for me, versus data. Our costs are in the $100,000 range over a three-year subscription."

"I rate the pricing an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. It is a pretty expensive tool."

"We went in on a three-year agreement which has an annual licensing fee, based upon the number of people that we're monitoring. There have not been any additional costs to the standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is fine compared to the market but I think that at some point the competitors will catch up on price."

"I had heard that it was much cheaper than Splunk and some of the other tools, and they gave us a nice package with support. They accommodated the number of users and support very well."

"The solution's price is double the competitors."

"Licensing is based on events per second (EPS), costing between $50 to $60 per EPS."

"Compared to other brands it seems more affordable to us."

More Securonix Next-Gen SIEM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Devo?

Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

They can improve their AI capabilities. If you look at some integrations like XDR or AI, which add to the platform to correlate situations in events, there are areas for enhancement. For instance, ...

See all answers

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?

In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securonix Security Analytics?

We work with CrowdStrike, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, and other cybersecurity products such as Gurucul. We are a service provider and partner of Securonix Next-Gen SIEM. We operate as a reseller of Se...

See all answers

What do you like most about Securonix Next-Gen SIEM?

The two major features of this product we extensively use are the UEBA capability and the multi-tenant approach with the centralized data logs system. Customers are very happy with these features.

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 19% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 10% of the time

Exabeam vs Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 9% of the time

Sumo Logic Security vs Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 8% of the time

More Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2025

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

August 2025

Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM product report

Also Known As

No data available

Securonix Security Analytics

Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is a security information and event management solution designed to provide advanced threat detection, response, and compliance capabilities. It leverages machine learning and big data analytics to offer a comprehensive security platform for modern enterprises.

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM utilizes advanced analytics and machine learning to detect complex threats that traditional SIEM solutions might miss. Its architecture is built on Hadoop, enabling scalability and the processing of large volumes of data in real-time. This allows organizations to gain deep insights into security incidents, prioritize threats, and automate response actions. The solution also includes behavior analytics to detect insider threats and unknown attacks, integrating seamlessly with existing IT infrastructure.

What are the critical features of Securonix Next-Gen SIEM?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses machine learning algorithms to identify sophisticated threats and reduce false positives.
Behavior Analytics: Analyzes user and entity behavior to detect insider threats and anomalies.
Scalable Architecture: Built on Hadoop, it scales to handle large data volumes, providing real-time analytics.
Automated Response: Automates incident response to mitigate threats quickly and efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with various IT and security tools for comprehensive coverage.

What is the ROI expectations?

Improved Threat Detection: Enhanced ability to detect and respond to advanced threats, reducing risk.
Operational Efficiency: Automation of repetitive tasks allows security teams to focus on more critical activities.
Cost Savings: Scalability and efficient data processing reduce the need for additional hardware and resources.
Compliance Support: Helps in meeting regulatory compliance requirements through detailed reporting and monitoring.

Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is implemented across various industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail. Its flexibility and advanced analytics capabilities make it suitable for environments with complex security needs. In finance, it helps detect fraud, while in healthcare, it ensures patient data security. In retail, it protects against data breaches and payment fraud.

In summary, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers advanced threat detection, scalability, and integration capabilities, making it a robust solution for modern enterprises.

Securonix Solutions

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Dtex Systems, Pfizer, Western Union, Harris, ITG

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

September 2025

Free Report: Devo vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.