Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell VPLEX vs IBM SAN Volume Control comparison

Dell Technologies and IBM are both solutions in the Storage Management category. Dell Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.0, while IBM is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Dell Technologies holds a 5.0% mindshare in SM, compared to IBM’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Dell VPLEX
Read 19 Dell VPLEX reviews
  • 712 Views
  • 484 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
IBM SAN Volume Control
Read 5 IBM SAN Volume Control reviews
  • 431 Views
  • 409 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Dell VPLEX and IBM SAN Volume Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Storage Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell VPLEX
Ranking in Storage Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM SAN Volume Control
Ranking in Storage Management
2nd
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Storage Management category, the mindshare of Dell VPLEX is 5.0%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SAN Volume Control is 4.4%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Storage Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM SAN Volume Control4.4%
Dell VPLEX5.0%
Other90.6%
Storage Management
 

Featured Reviews

Sayed Zuber - PeerSpot reviewer
Sayed Zuber
Sr. Storage And Backup Engineer at OMNIdata Trading, Lda.
It's an excellent solution for data mobility and disaster recovery, but the CLI can be difficult for beginners
Dell VPLEX currently requires Flash Player to access the GUI. It would be better to have a web-based HTML management interface. The encryption could also be improved. When the host writes data, it goes from VPLEX back to the physical storage. The physical storage device will do encryption or use an algorithm called Data Address Encryption. If there are vulnerabilities between the host and the storage device, you can lose your data. I suggest encrypting the data before it is sent from the host to the storage. I would also recommend using the NVM protocol in VPLEX. It still has Flash Player and a local SATA disk built into the Flash Player. You need to Flash the disk to SAS and then SATA. The NVM protocol is better.
Read full review
Nagendra Nekkala. - PeerSpot reviewer
Nagendra Nekkala.
Senior Manager ICT & at Bangalore International Airport Limited
A sustainable product that has ultra-low latency and reliable security features
Initially, we had some challenges with massive amounts of customer data. We have an airport segment where the passenger data are required, and it’s huge data. We needed a system that could store bulk data with low latency and provide a good customer experience. The solution is very famous. Ultra latency provides miraculous performance and productivity. It also enables advanced virtualization for good scalability. Anyone can opt to use the product. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is deduplication, as we have no duplication in the snapshots."
"Storage virtualization and geographic resilience for Metro Sans, plus a great performance improvement."
"The best feature of VPLEX storage is its ability to consolidate storage. It also provides the highest RPO and RTOs for replication technology. VPLEX enables application mobility."
"Its mirroring capabilities allow for data to be mirrored across two different data centers, so if one center were to crash or fail, the other center could take over and keep everything running smoothly."
"Mobility enables us to carry out an internal migration of data."
"Dell's technical support is awesome. We received instant support from EMC as long as we had an active contract."
"The solution works well. It's very reliable."
"The capacity to migrate machines onto VPLEX is great — it's very clean. We can migrate machines and add arrays easily."
"The product has an ultra-low latency."
"The virtualization layer has been great."
"The solution is easy to use, easily configurable, and easy to upgrade, manipulate, and add new storage."
"The most valuable features of IBM SAN Volume Control are the copy services, performance metrics, and analysis. Additionally, they have upgraded and introduced visual volumes."
"With SVC it is very easy to manage and to use for migration, meaning that when we want to move or to keep control of the volume or update a server database, it is very easy. That's why we use it."
 

Cons

"The price is a problem with EMC due to the fact that it's more expensive than the other vendors."
"With Dell VPLEX, there are some bugs with Broadcom."
"The initial setup is complex."
"VPLEX's engine-based architecture is complex, so the implementation is challenging and takes more time. It's also difficult to fix hardware issues. When an appliance fails, it takes Dell EMC a long time to fix it because spare parts are in short supply."
"VPLEX hardware migration to spare equipment in case of major disruption."
"Dell VPLEX should improve its integration and user interface and be easier to configure."
"Today, it needs a huge effort that is not acceptable during disaster recovery."
"I would like to have site-to-site replication capability for applications."
More Dell VPLEX cons
"IBM support can be very slow."
"I would like to see the usage of virtualized storage boxes improved. I'd like to see this feature fixed, especially for SVC controller, and to be able to hold more storage."
"IBM SAN Volume Control could improve by better integrations with other vendor systems. IBM SAN Volume Control can store the environment and are able to integrate with Veeam, but I don't know if they can integrate as well with SVC or other vendors' systems."
"They just need to put in the snap volume because now they use what is called a flash copy. This means that you have to take all the volume instead of NetApp which uses their snapshot."
"Patch management and upgrades must be made easier."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We struck a great deal with Dell EMC, so for us, VPLEX was not very expensive."
"VPLEX is a little bit expensive in my personal opinion."
"With SAN Volume Controller, we need to license by terabyte."
"The initial price of IBM SAN Volume Control is steep."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Insurance Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Dell VPLEX?
Some of the products are very easy to implement, while others are more difficult, and our team seeks support help when required. Regarding the integration part, the delivery team handles all integr...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Dell VPLEX?
We are implementing Cohesity, Hitachi, Dell, and Nutanix, VMware, vSAN; multiple products. We have recently started working with Cohesity because there was not much presence in India for Cohesity, ...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Dell VPLEX?
Hitachi Systems Microclinic has been renamed to Hitachi Systems India Private Limited. The email address has been changed to shailendra.chaudhry.hd at hitachi-systems.com from shailendra_singh.chau...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM SAN Volume Control?
The product has an ultra-low latency.
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM SAN Volume Control?
Initially, we had some challenges with massive amounts of customer data. We have an airport segment where the passenger data are required, and it’s huge data. We needed a system that could store bu...
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM SAN Volume Control?
Patch management and upgrades must be made easier. The storage expansion has some limitations. It must be improved.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Dell VPLEX Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Dell VPLEX
Compared 27% of the time
NetApp BlueXP vs Dell VPLEX Logo
NetApp BlueXP vs Dell VPLEX
Compared 19% of the time
IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs Dell VPLEX Logo
IBM Spectrum Virtualize vs Dell VPLEX
Compared 17% of the time
Huawei OceanStor DJ vs Dell VPLEX Logo
Huawei OceanStor DJ vs Dell VPLEX
Compared 15% of the time
More Dell VPLEX Competitors
Dell Storage Resource Manager (SRM) vs IBM SAN Volume Control Logo
Dell Storage Resource Manager (SRM) vs IBM SAN Volume Control
Compared 29% of the time
Huawei OceanStor DJ vs IBM SAN Volume Control Logo
Huawei OceanStor DJ vs IBM SAN Volume Control
Compared 29% of the time
More IBM SAN Volume Control Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Dell VPLEX
December 2025
Dell VPLEX reportDownload Dell VPLEX product report
Buyer's Guide
Storage Management
December 2025
IBM SAN Volume Control reportDownload IBM SAN Volume Control product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM SVC
 

Overview

Wth EMC VPLEX you can deploy next-generation virtualization architecture to enable simultaneous information access within, between, and across data centers, move applications, virtual machines, and data in and between data centers without impacting users and deliver application and data availability within the data center and over distance with full infrastructure utilization and zero downtime.
Dell Technologies

Built with IBM Spectrum Virtualize software—part of the IBM Spectrum Storage family—IBM SAN Volume Controller (SVC) is an enterprise-class storage system that helps organizations achieve better data economics by supporting the new large scale workloads that are critical to success. SVC systems can handle the massive volumes of data from mobile and social applications and enable flexible hybrid multicloud deployments and deliver the performance and scalability needed to gain insights from the latest analytics technologies.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Kindred Healthcare, Regis Aged Care, WeBank SpA, Panduit, Munson Healthcare
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control
December 2025
Free Report: Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Dell VPLEX vs. IBM SAN Volume Control report.
See our list of best Storage Management vendors.

We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.