We performed a comparison between DeepArmor and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"It is easy to install."
"The solution's TNA feature blocks devices from entering the network that do not meet compliance protocols."
"It is very simple to use. I've used some of the others in the past, such as Cisco AnyConnect, which was a nightmare. I've used a couple of others, but FortiClient is very simple to use."
"The Fortinet FortiClient is simple to use."
"The connection speed is fast. I can connect quickly at any time, and there are never any interruptions to the FortiClient connection. I could easily code into the client's server with that connection, with no lag."
"This solution makes it easier to work from home."
"FortiClient's most valuable features are that it's fast and safe."
"The solution is easy to configure and manage."
"Fortinet FortiClient's scalability is very good because it has no limitations."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"Detections could be improved."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The support needs improvement."
"The email scanning feature is not available in DeepArmor."
"The current version of this solution does not show the malicious websites that have been visited. They should add this to an upcoming release."
"The features for application control and device control must be improved."
"I have yet to find the benefits of the latest upgraded version."
"There should be more frequent releases or updates."
"It would be nice to see more in hand features in terms of the DLP, so that the solution can be integrated with the DLP, as well as more reporting features on the end point."
"The solution can improve by adding new remote console or endpoint features to make the solution easier to use."
"We'd like to see a deployment wizard to help implementation become streamlined."
"The product's performance and pricing could be better."
Earn 20 points
DeepArmor is ranked 71st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 15th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 85 reviews. DeepArmor is rated 2.0, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DeepArmor writes "Security needs improvement and email scanning features are not included". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". DeepArmor is most compared with , whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Ivanti Connect Secure.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.