DeepArmor vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SparkCognition and ESET are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. SparkCognition is ranked #58, while ESET is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.4. SparkCognition holds a 0.5% mindshare in EPP, compared to ESET’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of ESET users are willing to recommend the solution.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DeepArmor and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, Microsoft, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP).

To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DeepArmor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is 2.2%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform	2.2%
DeepArmor	0.5%
Other	93.5%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Muhammad Fahad

Manager Tech. & Support (Information Technology) at Texitech

Security needs improvement and email scanning features are not included

The email scanning feature is not available in DeepArmor. We cannot use this for email scanning. There are many options that are not available in DeepArmor. We cannot use separate applications for different internet applications or for different internet scanning. This is why we cannot use it. I would like to see additional features such as email scanning, which should be included, or malware detections, and other cybersecurity features should be included. It could also be more secure.

Read full review

Marko-Stojanovic

Owner at Online IT

Cloud-based protection has simplified daily client support and keeps threats under control

The problems that we are facing with policy adoption include slow adoption, as it takes more than five minutes to adopt policy on client computers. ESET Network Attack Protection sometimes helps in reducing network-level intrusions, but sometimes it prevents local devices on the network, which are well-known and good devices, from being recognized, treating them as a threat. So it requires more administration than usual. ESET could implement a good solution for remote support in ESET Endpoint Protection Platform for improvement in the future. Since you have the cloud console, ESET could have something similar to AnyDesk or TeamViewer, but from ESET.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefit of using Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks while employing Palo Alto Firewall at the internet edge is that it improves security on our endpoint devices, integrating seamlessly with Palo Alto Firewalls to deliver comprehensive network, analyst, and security details all in a single dashboard, which allows us to manage everything from our network devices."

"Traps is quite a stable product. Once it was properly deployed and configured, you have nothing to be worried about."

"Cortex is a very good total solution on the endpoints."

"The stability is pretty good except for one or two cases, and based on the performance, it's been okay with pretty high performance, no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."

"Previously, we had to install endpoint protection per machine and then scan and update, but Cortex XDR basically does that centrally and predictably, so we have more time to do day-to-day work rather than spend time chasing those endpoints."

"These days it's machine-learning technology and behavior-based analytics features that make us more secure."

"I've found the solution to be highly scalable for enterprises."

"The initial setup isn't too bad."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It is easy to install."

"The tool offers great detection. You need time only to setup the environment. After that, it is just plug-and-play to get the solution up and running. We can also control the PC remotely from the cloud and get all the information in one place."

"It rarely gets in the way, and we don't even notice it scanning."

"When we use ESET, our clients do not have any problem with viruses and any problems with ransomware and other types of viruses, so it is a very good product."

"The most valuable features of this solution are, of course, the IPS/IDS, Intrusion Prevention, Intrusion Detection, and Antivirus."

"It effectively catches unwanted stuff. It has saved our bacon over many years."

"I'd recommend the solution. The security is good and it's easy to install even on an enterprise level."

"Easy to use security solution, helps to secure connected devices against viruses in the digital world."

"A feature we like is setting the GUI of ESET Endpoint Security/ESET File Security to silent mode because some servers and clients can have performance issues."

More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform pros

Cons

"Data privacy is a matter of concern. You have to be careful with data privacy, it can be sensitive and Cortex can have most of your access."

"I feel that it should not be a licensed activity because a feature should allow us to see applications running on end devices."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

"The price could be a little lower."

"The installation should be easier and the Palo Alto pre-sales and sales teams should have more information on the product because they don't know what they are selling."

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"It should support more mobile operating systems. That is one of the cons of their infrastructure right now."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The email scanning feature is not available in DeepArmor. We cannot use this for email scanning."

"The heuristic of ESET is not so effective in standard mode."

"The problems that we are facing with policy adoption include slow adoption, as it takes more than five minutes to adopt policy on client computers."

"We do get false positives."

"The solution can improve the modules, and it is lacking centralized management and visibility of the endpoints."

"There are some complexities if you want to manipulate the software."

"The management of the solution isn't as clear as it could be. They could adjust that to make it a better product."

"While the pricing is good, they could always lower it a bit."

"Everything has some kind of room for improvement."

More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is quite an expensive solution."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"I am using the Community edition."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"There are licensing fees."

"ESET is cheap."

"The price could be lower, but it's comparable, as other solutions have a similar price for the same effect."

"I'd have to look through my records, however, we paid maybe $600 to $1000 for this product."

"The price of ESET Endpoint Security is in the middle range of price compared to other solutions. For example, BitDefender can be more expensive."

"It is just under $20 a user per year, and there are no additional costs. I would rate it a five out of five in terms of pricing."

"The price could be a little lower."

"The cost is a very reasonable. When compared with other products, the price is low (though not very low)."

"At first, we thought it was a bit expensive, but we negotiated a better price."

More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

No data available

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ESET LiveGuard Advanced?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform are good with no issues. The price is ver...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ESET LiveGuard Advanced?

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform could be improved by offering integrations and user-friendly dashboards that could ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ESET LiveGuard Advanced?

My main use case for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is preventing malware and preventing outside attackers. When a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs DeepArmor

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs DeepArmor

Compared 15% of the time

VIPRE Endpoint Security vs DeepArmor

Compared 8% of the time

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs DeepArmor

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs DeepArmor

Compared 7% of the time

More DeepArmor Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 3% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 3% of the time

BigFix vs ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

November 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

October 2026

Download DeepArmor product report

Buyer's Guide

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform

November 2026

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform report

Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Smart Security, ESET PROTECT Advanced, ESET LiveGuard Advanced, ESET PROTECT Platform

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

DeepArmor offers advanced cybersecurity solutions, specifically designed for businesses that require intelligent threat protection. Utilizing cutting-edge technology, it caters to both endpoint protection and network defense.

DeepArmor leverages machine learning and artificial intelligence to provide proactive security measures. These technologies enable accurate threat detection and swift action, minimizing risk and improving overall security posture. DeepArmor is suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive defense against evolving cyber threats.

What are the notable features of DeepArmor?

Machine Learning: Enhances threat detection accuracy by learning from previous data.
AI-Powered Defense: Automates responses to emerging threats, reducing response times.
Behavioral Analysis: Identifies suspicious activities by analyzing user patterns.
Cloud-Based Management: Facilitates remote management and monitoring.

What benefits should users expect from DeepArmor?

Enhanced Security: Robust protection against sophisticated cyber attacks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces potential losses from data breaches with preemptive measures.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing business needs.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security processes through automation.

DeepArmor implementation is evident in industries like finance and healthcare, where data protection is paramount. In finance, it safeguards sensitive financial information, while in healthcare, it ensures compliance with protection regulations by securing patient records. The application of AI and machine learning across these fields strengthens defensive capabilities, aligning with industry-specific needs.

SparkCognition

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive security with minimal CPU and RAM impact, effective malware protection, and seamless updates, making it ideal for organizations needing reliable digital security.

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is highly regarded for its effective ThreatSense technology, advanced firewall, and central control capabilities. Users benefit from its lightweight design and efficient notification system, enjoying customizable management through its management console. Despite its strengths, there are opportunities to enhance malware repair, update processes, and AI integration. The platform's compatibility across operating systems and integration with systems like ESET PROTECT allows organizations to effectively secure endpoints and servers against threats like malware, viruses, and ransomware.

What are the key features of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform?

Minimal CPU and RAM Impact: Designed for efficient use of resources.
ThreatSense Technology: Provides reliable threat detection and response.
Advanced Firewall: Offers enhanced network security.
Central Control: Allows for organized management from a single point.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly integrates with cloud services for expanded functionality.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Malware Protection: Ensures effective defense against diverse threats.
Seamless Updates: Facilitates stress-free upgrading to maintain security.
Lightweight and Efficient: Provides strong security without compromising system performance.
Customizable Management: Allows for tailored security management to suit specific needs.
Affordable Pricing: Offers value-driven pricing without compromising on protection quality.

Organizations deploy ESET Endpoint Protection Platform to safeguard laptops, desktops, and servers from cyber threats. Its use extends to antivirus protection, firewall configuration, and network monitoring. Companies often integrate it with ESET PROTECT and Apache HTTP Proxy for optimized management and updates, making it a versatile choice in industries requiring robust endpoint security.

ESET

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

AV-Comparatives

ERSTE Group Bank, Miller Solutions, Wesleyan University, The Hospital Center of Luxembourg, Deer Valley USD, SPAR, Industrial Federal Credit Union, Honda, City Hall of Palmela, Hays CISD, Lester B Pearson School Board

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, Microsoft, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.