CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs Entrust Identity Enterprise comparison

CyberArk and Entrust are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. CyberArk is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0, while Entrust is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.5. CyberArk holds a 1.6% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Entrust’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Entrust users who would recommend it.

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Read 2 CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla reviews

753 Views
361 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Read 7 Entrust Identity Enterprise reviews

989 Views
307 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 30, 2025

Entrust Identity Enterprise and CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla compete in the identity and access management sector. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced feature set, despite Entrust's competitive pricing and user support.

Features: Entrust Identity Enterprise focuses on security and scalability, offers multifactor authentication, and integrated identity management. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla has advanced identity governance capabilities, strengths in lifecycle management, and compliance reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entrust Identity Enterprise offers a streamlined on-premises and cloud deployment process with extensive support resources. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is noted for its cloud-native deployment with efficient onboarding processes and dedicated support services.

Pricing and ROI: Entrust Identity Enterprise is known for its competitive pricing and attractive ROI with efficient cost structures. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, while having a higher initial investment, provides substantial ROI through enhanced governance capabilities and reduced compliance risks.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

15th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (15th)

Entrust Identity Enterprise

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is 1.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Entrust Identity Enterprise is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla	1.6%
Entrust Identity Enterprise	1.0%
Other	97.4%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Hubert Hopkins

IT Compliance Analyst at The Baldwin Group

Reasonably priced, responsive support, and easy to implement access reviews

There is still no automated way to de-provision access due to a review completion, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. Right now it is just a one-way integration, importing user lists. I believe they working on it. I can pull a user list in, but when I do a review, the results get sent to a ticket which requires a person to execute. As a result of the review, there is no automation for the removal of access. They are going there, and the next step is to continue to streamline the process operationally and resource-wise. The review process is great. The scope for improvement is more at the results end. It would be great if it could systematically communicate with that end system and remove the requested access automatically.

Read full review

Iwegbue Godspower Isioma

Cyber Security Analyst at Platview Technologies

Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP)

The main issue I've noticed pertains to setting up the desktop client on virtual machines in Azure, GCP, or AWS, specifically for Entrust Identity Enterprise intended for on-premises use. It works for on-premises, but I'm not sure if it's fully supported in cloud environments. If support were added, it would function perfectly with on-premises configurations. So, it functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We had these spreadsheets all over the place, but now we have a library of evidence to consult when needed. Zilla keeps everything in one place. It's not scattered all over anymore."

"I enjoy the ease of setup and creation of a review. Being a user of the tool or kind of an admin of the tool, the ease of setup of an access review is valuable."

"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."

"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."

"It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."

"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."

"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."

Cons

"Maybe this is coming with their AI module, but I would like to see a feature that performs baseline analysis of permissions that may not fit into a role, and it attempts to group them into a role. We've run into problems with applications where someone has not created a role but assigned ad hoc permissions to a user. We still need to do some manual work to identify the group that the user belongs to. It would be amazing to have Zilla streamline that."

"There is still no automated way to de-provision access as a result of a review, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. They are getting closer to that."

"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."

"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."

"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."

"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factors for us to purchase it at the time. It was reasonably priced."

"The subscription could be yearly or monthly, depending upon your choice."

"It's worth the money."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Security Firm

23%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?

It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zilla Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?

We use the tool for access reviews. It is mainly for our regulatory SOX compliance. That was the main use case, and why we purchased Zilla back at the end of 2021.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Entrust IdentityGuard?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Entrust IdentityGuard?

I use it for an extra layer of security, that is two-factor authentication (2FA).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Entrust IdentityGuard?

I would recommend it. I've used it for three years now, and I'm very happy with it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 66% of the time

Veza vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 13% of the time

Lumos vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 12% of the time

AuthMind vs CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla

Compared 9% of the time

More CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla Competitors

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Entrust Identity Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

More Entrust Identity Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Identity Management (IM)

October 2025

Download CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla product report

Buyer's Guide

Entrust Identity Enterprise

October 2025

Download Entrust Identity Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Zilla Security

IdentityGuard

Overview

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is designed to streamline identity governance and administration by automating access controls and compliance processes, enhancing security and efficiency.

Known for its robust capabilities, CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla offers comprehensive identity governance that simplifies policy enforcement and compliance management. It enables organizations to efficiently manage user access, reducing risks and ensuring secure operations. By leveraging automation, it minimizes manual tasks and enhances productivity.

What are the key features?

Automated Access Controls: Reduces the need for manual processes by streamlining access management.
Compliance Management: Facilitates adherence to regulatory standards with built-in compliance features.
Risk Reduction: Identifies and mitigates potential security threats with advanced risk analytics.
Scalability: Supports growth by efficiently handling expanding user bases and increasing security demands.

Which benefits or ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection against unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Automates tasks to save time and resources.
Compliance Assurance: Simplifies the process of meeting regulatory requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces expenses associated with manual identity management processes.

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where regulatory compliance and data protection are critical. It helps organizations enhance their security postures while ensuring compliance with industry standards.

CyberArk

Identity Enterprise is an integrated IAM platform that supports a full suite of workforce, consumer, and citizen use cases. Ideally suited for high-assurance applications that require a Zero Trust approach for thousands or millions of users, Identity Enterprise can be deployed on-premises.

Entrust

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Bank of New Zealand, CRISIL, Banco Mercantil, G_teborg University, Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, Ocean Systems, Skanska, Societe Generale, Susquehanna Bancshares

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

September 2025

Free Report: CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. Entrust Identity Enterprise report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.