We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"The feature called PTA, which stands for Privileged Threat Analytics keeps track of what admins are doing and works with Centimeters. If something fishy is going on with a user's credentials, it alerts the security team so they can act fast. Plus, it automates stuff like resetting credentials or blocking users. So, if there's a potential hack, CyberArk can change passwords and lock out users in a snap. It also gives you a heads-up if anything unusual is going on with server activities, like someone creating new users with uncontrolled credentials."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"It offers great performance."
"The solution is very good at the management of the identity lifecycle."
"One of the most valuable aspects of SailPoint is its open integration interface."
"User provisioning and the role management features are good."
"The big one now is that they're adding AI and machine learning to figure out automated approvals and make recommendations to their reviewers. So, if I bring up Doug McPherson and it says he has access to this application, the system will make a review based on peer group analysis. That's one of the biggest new things. The problem used to be that people would get everything loaded on, and they created too much work for themselves. Now, they can use these policies and start to let the machine pick the less risky things."
"It is a stable tool, which we run in our complex environment."
"Has a great certification module with intuitive options."
"The support is very good."
"The most valuable feature for our customers and for us is the identity data warehouse."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"There are various functions that don't work in IdentityIQ, including the access request reminder, which doesn't go to the approvals in the proper format, so it's hard for users to read."
"The price of IdentityIQ could be lower. There are additional costs when you buy the licenses, and they force the customers to pay for them."
"The solution's technical support team's response time and skills need improvement since it is an area where there are shortcomings."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ has a primitive AI engine."
"They should lower the price and technical support should be better."
"The connector for EPIC, ServiceNow, and Duo."
"The mover process for this solution could be improved."
"The product’s cloud offering could be flexible."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
