

CrowdStrike and NetWitness compete in cybersecurity, specifically in threat detection and response. CrowdStrike Falcon has the upper hand in endpoint protection and ease of use, while NetWitness excels in network visibility and event correlation.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive endpoint visibility, advanced threat detection capabilities, and AI-driven threat analysis. Its EDR feature and remote system connection enhance threat analysis and manual intervention. Users value its automated alerts and system integrity checks. NetWitness NDR provides strong network visibility, excels in historical tracking, and event correlation, offering a granular market analysis.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could enhance reporting, logging details, and integration with third-party technologies. There's a need for native support for legacy systems and additional features like email security scanning. NetWitness NDR would benefit from improved scalability, integration with non-native applications, and enhanced threat detection metrics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon is noted for its straightforward deployment process across various cloud environments and generally well-received technical support, though some users report occasional delays. NetWitness NDR, primarily on-premises, has solid technical support, slightly edging out CrowdStrike in user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is considered a premium product with higher pricing but offers robust protection and comprehensive features justifying the cost through reduced downtime. NetWitness NDR also has a high price tag, viewed as cost-effective due to variability in module pricing and deployment size. CrowdStrike's strategies for bulk purchasing and negotiations may provide more flexibility.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
It's very easy to deploy without many IT admins, saving time.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
The solution is a bit expensive.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 11.0% |
| NetWitness NDR | 1.2% |
| Other | 87.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint protection and threat detection, leveraging cloud-native architecture and AI-driven capabilities for advanced security. Its design ensures minimal system impact, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking efficient protection solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive security features, including endpoint detection and response, real-time threat insights, and advanced AI-driven detection mechanisms. Its cloud-native architecture facilitates effortless scalability and seamless integration with cloud services, securing endpoints, servers, and roaming users. While Falcon delivers strong threat intelligence and automated detection, it faces challenges in operating system compatibility, reports require enhancements, and integration with some technologies is limited. High pricing and occasional false positives are noted areas for improvement, along with expanded support for older systems.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?In industries requiring fortified cybersecurity measures, CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed for endpoint protection and incident response. It offers advanced threat defense and integrates well with cloud services, making it a suitable replacement for traditional antivirus solutions. For sectors engaging in forensic investigations and real-time malware defense, Falcon's capabilities align with their security demands, serving industries from healthcare to finance.
Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.