CockroachDB vs PlanetScale comparison

Cockroach Labs and PlanetScale are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach Labs is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while PlanetScale is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2. Cockroach Labs holds a 4.1% mindshare in SQL, compared to PlanetScale’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Cockroach Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PlanetScale users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 13 CockroachDB reviews

3,504 Views
2,943 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

PlanetScale

Read 6 PlanetScale reviews

814 Views
806 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

PlanetScale

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

CockroachDB and PlanetScale compete in the distributed database space. CockroachDB appears to have the upper hand in global data distribution and strong consistency, making it suitable for robust infrastructure needs, while PlanetScale's emphasis on developer ease makes it popular for rapid deployment.

Features: CockroachDB provides auto-healing capabilities, a distributed SQL model for seamless scaling, and geo-partitioning for data residency solutions. PlanetScale offers schema change workflows, branching capabilities for development flexibility, and integration ease with tools like Prisma.

Room for Improvement: CockroachDB could enhance its user interface and simplify tuning processes for better developer usability. In contrast, PlanetScale might improve by offering more in-depth analytical features, expanding its documentation clarity, and providing more comprehensive enterprise-level options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CockroachDB offers a traditional deployment method with detailed documentation and enterprise-level support, suitable for mission-critical applications. PlanetScale emphasizes cloud-first deployments with an intuitive developer experience and smooth integration.

Pricing and ROI: CockroachDB's pricing includes free tiers, suitable for initial implementations, but enterprise-level demands could increase costs. PlanetScale's pricing structure appeals to smaller teams with a focus on speed, providing better ROI for developer-centric projects.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. PlanetScale Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. PlanetScale

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (17th), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (11th)

PlanetScale

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 4.1%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PlanetScale is 1.1%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CockroachDB	4.1%
PlanetScale	1.1%
Other	94.8%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Shivam Chauhan

Manager, Software Engineering at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Provides developer-friendly environment with robust security and cost-efficiency

The platform should provide a UI feature where users have the ability to manage it. The CockroachDB platform should have a chatbot where users can inquire about pricing or seek solutions for queries, rather than relying on email support. The current UI only provides SQL playground, which is technical. There should be a UI playground where users with limited technical knowledge can run and update queries, similar to phpMyAdmin or Adminer. Latency optimization could be improved for globally distributed applications, particularly in query routing. For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking. The disadvantages include cost-efficiency with multi-region deployment and schema migration speed, which should be faster compared to other drivers. The query optimizer should handle complex queries better through the UI interface.

Read full review

Neeraj Sameer Allu

Founder at Tuft

Manages databases in serverless environments and easy to get started with

The main thing I didn't like about PlanetScale was that we couldn't run analytical queries on it. They bill based on the number of rows read, so even a simple count query could easily use up our allocated resources. Apart from that, I actually loved it. It's based on MySQL, so it doesn't have foreign key constraints or cascades. We have to delete manually or use an ORM. As it's based on MySQL, we can use log posters for complex queries, but it only supports MySQL. I feel like Postgres is more useful for custom or complex queries.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CockroachDB is excellent for managing relationships in RDBMS with multiple benefits such as the ability to create views and dynamic queries that save data and reduce the use of complex algorithms in code."

"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."

"The product has valuable security features."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases."

"The initial setup and deployment are simple."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

More CockroachDB pros

"One feature I appreciate about PlanetScale is its ability to handle migrations and commands without the need to run them manually in the database."

"I like the solution's developer experience. When you deploy changes to the database in the portal, you can use different deployment strategies and see how things work. You can put changes into different branches, like deployment and staging. This is built into the product, allowing you to navigate changes through different branches."

"I recommend using PlanetScale as it provides ease of access and control over database changes using commands from the local terminal."

"The branching feature is also good for developer experience."

"I did not face any downtime when using the product."

"The database is accessible 24/7, ensuring my project runs smoothly without interruptions."

"The solution is beginner-friendly. Like any new platform, it can be a bit confusing at first. But after spending about an hour with it, you can get a clear idea of what everything is for. It's not very confusing; I think they've improved it recently."

Cons

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

"The platform could be more extensible."

"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."

"For multi-region deployment, CockroachDB requires at least three plus replicas across data centers to achieve strong consistency across regions, which increases infrastructure costs including compute, storage, and networking."

More CockroachDB cons

"I would like PlanetScale to have a feature where the database can be accessed in the cloud with a link, allowing for a more user-friendly interface compared to the terminal."

"I used PlanetScale for hobby projects, so my perspective differs from someone using it commercially. Unfortunately, they've removed the free tier in recent months and pivoted to a business-to-business model. This is sad for hobby developers like me because it's a great product, but I understand they have costs to cover."

"We encountered some initial issues during the product deployment, which required me to search for solutions on forums."

"I am not sure, but I think recently, the tool removed the free version."

"When I tried to integrate the solution with Firebase for authentication, I faced some interruptions. Also, when using it with Next.js and NextAuth.js for Google and social logins, I had some troubles."

"The main thing I didn't like about PlanetScale was that we couldn't run analytical queries on it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The solution is expensive for beginners. That's why I wasn't motivated to use it more. But they were already providing many features for free for beginners, which was great."

"Last time, when I wanted to use the tool in a project, I could see it was only paid, so I didn't use the service."

"I am currently using the product's free version, which has been sufficient for my portfolio project."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

We have been using CockroachDB for the last two years. From 2023, we started working on a product similar to Google Capture. We decided to work with CockroachDB with Hasura. Hasura is a UI for the ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CockroachDB?

The tech support deserves a rating of nine out of ten. My overall rating for CockroachDB is 8 out of 10.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PlanetScale?

I am currently using the product's free version, which has been sufficient for my portfolio project. The paid version ranges from $39 to $1,000, depending on the features and scale required.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PlanetScale?

I would like PlanetScale to have a feature where the database can be accessed in the cloud with a link, allowing for a more user-friendly interface compared to the terminal. This would make it easi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PlanetScale?

I have used PlanetScale as it is an advanced version of MySQL. It functions as a platform where MySQL is live, similar to AWS. I use PlanetScale to store data in a live environment where queries ca...

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 13% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 8% of the time

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 8% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 8% of the time

SQL Server vs CockroachDB

Compared 7% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs PlanetScale

Compared 57% of the time

Citus Data vs PlanetScale

Compared 19% of the time

SQL Server vs PlanetScale

Compared 7% of the time

Google Cloud SQL vs PlanetScale

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale

Compared 6% of the time

More PlanetScale Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

May 2026

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

April 2026

Download PlanetScale product report

Overview

CockroachDB is a high-performance, cloud-native database offering fault-tolerance, geo-partitioning, and PostgreSQL compatibility, ensuring distributed transactions with robust security for global applications.

CockroachDB offers advanced features like geo-replication and ensures data residency through its distributed architecture. This minimizes application modifications by supporting the PostgreSQL wire protocol while providing enhanced fault-tolerance. High availability is maintained through automatic node syncing and workload distribution. Security is prioritized with SSL certificates and role-based access control, facilitating ease of use and observability through an intuitive interface. Despite its capabilities, areas like documentation, disaster recovery, and high availability are improving, with an emphasis on enhanced protocol support and serverless offerings.

What are CockroachDB's key features?

Geo-Partitioning: Supports data residency and speeds up processing through regional distribution.
PostgreSQL Compatibility: Minimizes app modifications with wire protocol support.
Distributed Architecture: Offers automatic rebalancing, node syncing, and workload distribution.
Security Features: Includes SSL certificates and role-based access control.
ACID Transactions: Ensures transactional integrity across distributed systems.

What benefits should users expect?

Scalability: Facilitates cloud-native scaling, simplifying operations.
Data Residency: Offers compliance with regional data laws through geo-replication.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces complexity, enhancing resource allocation.
High Availability: Supports real-time processing for high-velocity applications.
Compatibility: Ensures smooth integration with existing PostgreSQL setups.

CockroachDB finds application across industries such as fintech and media, where distributed transactions and high availability are critical. It's ideal for platforms requiring real-time data processing, like credit scoring and music streaming, thanks to its scalability, resilience, and top-tier security.

Cockroach Labs

PlanetScale offers seamless database management for Postgres and MySQL with features tailored for modern development environments, enabling enhanced project operations through efficient integration and ease of use.

PlanetScale is designed to support modern developer workflows through features like PgBouncer connection pooling and constant availability, making it ideal for serverless applications. Its integration with tools like Cloudflare and DrizzleORM enhances the developer experience, allowing fast setup and effortless database interactions.

What are the most important features of PlanetScale?

PgBouncer connection pooling: Optimizes database connections for serverless environments.
Constant availability: Ensures uninterrupted operations and workflow efficiency.
Developer-friendly: Integrates seamlessly with Cloudflare hyperdrive and DrizzleORM for enhanced project management.
Quick setup: Simplifies setup processes in corporate environments, allowing immediate use.
Local NVMe storage: PlanetScale Metal lets your database run with locally attached NVMe storage, giving you faster reads and writes.
Database branching: Teams can set up independent branches for CICD tests and staging environments, simplifying the development process.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating PlanetScale?

Uninterrupted project operations: Facilitates constant availability for high-performance applications.
Enhanced developer experience: Offers intuitive integrations and project management capabilities.
Ease of integration: Works well with popular tools like Cloudflare hyperdrive and DrizzleORM for efficient workflows.

PlanetScale finds significant use in hosting databases for enterprise companies, other infrastructure providers, chat applications, and hobby projects. Its compatibility with DrizzleORM facilitates seamless MySQL and Postgres database management online. Users leverage its capabilities for OLTP workloads and manage data environments effectively.

PlanetScale

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

Block, Intercom, Convex, MyFitnessPal

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. PlanetScale

April 2026

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. PlanetScale

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. PlanetScale and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. PlanetScale report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.