We performed a comparison between CloudCheckr CMx High Security and ServiceNow IT Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."
"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is mostly stable."
"It is flexible. You can tune it, more or less, as you want."
"It's easy to set up."
"ServiceNow IT Operations Management is a stable product."
"The auto remediation feature has been most valuable. They have also introduced an AOP feature of ServiceNow that we are keen to explore."
"Their Event Management is very good."
"The initial setup is very straightforward. A person just needs to join a team to access the network and that's all."
"The most important features of ServiceNow IT Operations Management are the discovery service mapping and orchestration."
"It has been very useful for tracking. It has evolved a lot over time, and there is a single pane of glass where you can track and see everything."
"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."
"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."
"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."
"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."
"At times, it got cumbersome from the project management perspective. It could have been because of the way we were using it. I found Microsoft Project to be more extensive and robust than ITOM."
"The security policies could be increased."
"It should have better integrations with other solutions."
"My managers would say that the price is too high. We wanted to also have the visibility version of it, but it's too expensive for us. Going for visibility would have doubled up the price."
"Service mapping is pretty limited."
"Service Mapping is a time-consuming process. The time and effort versus the benefits are very difficult to articulate to customers."
"I would like more manual issues to have automated report-facing options."
"The tool can be improved by including more detailed information to assist new users."
More CloudCheckr CMx High Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ServiceNow IT Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
CloudCheckr CMx High Security is ranked 14th in Cloud Management with 4 reviews while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is ranked 7th in Cloud Management with 14 reviews. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is rated 8.4, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CloudCheckr CMx High Security writes "Easy to figure out how to use, has a simple integration, and detects issues and vulnerabilities by priority level". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow IT Operations Management writes "Useful for event management, aggregation, correlation, and analytics". CloudCheckr CMx High Security is most compared with CloudHealth, Azure Cost Management, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS Trusted Advisor and AWS Cost Management, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management is most compared with BMC TrueSight Operations Management, Datadog, Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI), HPE OneView and Moogsoft. See our CloudCheckr CMx High Security vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management report.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
