Claude for Enterprise vs Make comparison

Read 17 Make reviews

2,493 Views
1,247 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Claude for Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 26, 2026

Make and Claude for Enterprise compete in the enterprise software market, with Claude appearing to have an advantage due to its advanced AI-driven features enhancing business decisions, despite Make's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Make offers efficient workflows with automation, drag-and-drop capabilities, comprehensive integration options, and unlimited workflow creation. Claude provides advanced AI-driven analytics, personalized insights, and facilitates rapid code writing and workflow creation, significantly boosting organizational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Make could enhance its API integration and expand support for non-technical users. Claude's pricing may be a barrier for smaller enterprises and could improve user interface intuitiveness and expand its library of integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Make facilitates deployment with user-friendly interfaces and strong support, making it accessible to non-technical teams. Claude offers comprehensive deployment models and robust technical support ensuring smooth integration, with rapid issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Make is cost-effective, offering a low initial cost with significant ROI achieved through its scalability and automation efficiency. Claude, despite its higher pricing, provides substantial long-term returns through AI features, optimizing business growth and justifying the investment for organizations seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Claude for Enterprise vs. Make Report (Updated: April 2026).

Claude for Enterprise vs. Make

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise

Ranking in AI Software Development

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Powered Chatbots (4th), AI Writing Tools (6th), AI Code Assistants (7th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (6th), AI Proofreading Tools (5th), AI Content Creation (5th), AI Research (3rd)

Make

Ranking in AI Software Development

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 1.9%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.7%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Make	0.7%
Claude for Enterprise	1.9%
Other	97.4%

AI Software Development

Featured Reviews

Chirag Morajkar

Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at CleanFoldz Laundry

Automation workflows have transformed daily deliveries and now save weeks of development time

The biggest frustration for me regarding Claude for Enterprise is the pricing and credit consumption. Even for small changes, it consumes more credits than any other competitive platform. If there are more credits, the cost increases. I believe that is definitely a factor. Claude for Enterprise has done an exceptional job in delivering all the right things except for the pricing, because it comes with a good amount of cost. If it could ensure that small changes consume fewer credits, that would be helpful. My final thoughts on Claude for Enterprise are that with the growing use of automations, if Claude for Enterprise could come up with a no-code solution—currently it uses credits to code things—but if it could be a drag-and-drop type of solution, as other competitors such as Make.com or n8n offer, I believe that would be a huge advancement. Currently it is usable for even non-technical people, as they just have to use it with prompts, but if it were structured with a drag-and-drop method to create automation, it would be even more cost-effective and faster than coding it and finding the debugging parts.

Read full review

Farhan Ahmed Sheikh

Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions

Flexibility and efficiency accelerate business processes

Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make. The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved. The operation consumption is too high and sometimes becomes a burden on the client. Make needs to review its pricing strategy since they have tough competition from n8n. Make sometimes has issues with user logins and data saving when simultaneously working on two different PCs or when two developers are working on something or some blueprint. It can lose saved data from one interface to the other, and when logging on with the same user on another workstation, it occasionally misbehaves. We were unaware that Make had its own local implementation module. They need to advertise this feature more effectively as we are developing many projects in Make and working with various clients.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."

"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."

"One of the best features Claude for Enterprise offers is that there is no competitor for Claude in creating workflows at a very fast level."

"Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick Python scripts."

"Claude for Enterprise has positively impacted my organization and my workflow because it has made our shipping very fast, so we are shipping at light speed right now, our products are launching within a week, and our features are being shipped in a day or sometimes even less."

"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."

"Every employee used to work manually, and I also used to do manual tasks, now Make does everything automatically."

"This means the task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make."

"Make saves me roughly forty-five percent to sixty percent of time since the analysis part and solution are provided below the question."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by helping me save around 10 plus hours per month to automate reporting and social media posting."

"Using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved."

"The new AI feature that Make has launched is really amazing."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing our manual workflow and workload by almost twenty to thirty percent, which I feel is great."

More Make pros

Cons

"The biggest frustration for me regarding Claude for Enterprise is the pricing and credit consumption."

"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."

"Claude for Enterprise could be better because I think it is quite expensive and even after spending $200, there are token limitations that might come up sometimes."

"The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases."

"I feel that Make can be improved in terms of API handling and integrations."

"There is a file size constraint, as when I try to upload a PDF question bank of 200 pages, it shows an error and the file cannot process the data."

"There is still a lot of difference when it comes to how the credits come into use and how to monetize what is being offered by Make."

"I give Make a rating of seven because it is not open-sourced and there are many hidden charges, which can affect a beginner's workflow when trying it out."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"Actually, I did not finish this project with Make; I could not manage to finish the full workflow, and I decided to leave it as it is, implementing it a different way because it is very tricky."

"Make can be improved in terms of the code module, as sometimes I use it at a developer level, and I want it to be more specific; when using the webhook, some data structures may require a lot of time to organize, so if a code node is available, it would help me structure data effectively."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

More Make cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

15%

Educational Organization

10%

Non Tech Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?

For an individual user, it is very easy and straightforward. I cannot speak to larger teams.

What needs improvement with Claude?

What is your primary use case for Claude?

My main use case for Claude for Enterprise is building multiple workflows, which can be coded ones. For example, I am working on an operational workflow that manages daily deliveries for the busine...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Earlier I used to spend too much time understanding the insights from my projects. Now I only spend four to five hours, but I can get everything in one hour or even 30 seconds. It's easy. After one...

What needs improvement with Make?

Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly. The credits are also getting used up too quickly, which takes too much credit. If the credits could be reduced, that would be more efficient. T...

What is your primary use case for Make?

I'm using Make for integration with GoHighLevel, which is a CRM tool. I integrate data from Google Sheets or the GHL CRM to automate repetitive tasks. I use Make nearly every day for whatever task ...

Cursor vs Claude for Enterprise

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs Claude for Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Windsurf vs Claude for Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Sudowrite vs Claude for Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

Grammarly Pro - Enterprise vs Claude for Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Claude for Enterprise Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 15% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Make

Compared 15% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Pega Platform vs Make

Compared 11% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 11% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Download Claude for Enterprise product report

Claude for Enterprise

May 2026

Download Make product report

April 2026

Also Known As

Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku, Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5

Integromat

Overview

Claude for Enterprise streamlines workflows by enhancing code writing efficiency, accelerating task completion, and improving accuracy across diverse applications. It offers advanced AI capabilities, aiding professionals in boosting productivity while reducing time-to-market.

Designed with a strong focus on workflow optimization, Claude for Enterprise aids in whiteboarding, debugging, and automation. It supports users with artifact features for data visualization and generates HTML outputs, optimizing tasks like bug resolution and operational workflow management. With multiple agents and plugins, it's ideal for Python scripting and addressing complex inquiries. Users appreciate its effectiveness in email writing, yet point out cost and token limitations as areas for improvement. Enhancements in no-code automation, integration with external tools, and security measures are sought after, along with alignment with ChatGPT's capabilities for daily tasks.

What are the essential features of Claude for Enterprise?

Code Writing Efficiency: Reduces launch times with faster, high-quality coding.
Email Writing Support: Outperforms competitors in drafting accurate emails.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes with quick, accurate results.
Data Visualization: Efficiently creates HTML outputs for newsletters.

What benefits should professionals expect?

Enhanced Productivity: Reduces the time required for task completion.
Improved Code Quality: Allows focus on diverse tasks with reliable code generation.
Operation Smoothness: Supports franchisee management with efficient workflows.
Time-to-Market Reduction: Accelerates product development and launches.

In the tech industry, Claude for Enterprise is used for whiteboarding and automation to enhance software development and testing processes. Marketing teams apply data visualization capabilities for effective communication via newsletters, while operational teams benefit from workflow automation in managing complex processes.

Anthropic

Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.

What features does Make offer?

Visual Workflow Builder: Create and edit workflows effortlessly with a friendly interface.
App Integration: Supports numerous apps, enabling diverse connections.
Real-Time Monitoring: Track workflow executions with precise analytics.
Conditional Logic: Implement logic paths for smarter automations.

What benefits can users expect from Make?

Increased Efficiency: Automating tasks reduces manual intervention, saving time.
Cost Reduction: Lower operational costs with streamlined processes.
Scalable Solutions: Easily adjust workflows to meet growing business demands.
Enhanced Productivity: Focus on high-priority tasks with automated operations.

In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Buan Consulting, Armadia