Claude for Enterprise vs Make comparison

Read 18 Make reviews

4,089 Views
1,840 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Claude for Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 26, 2026

Make and Claude for Enterprise compete in the enterprise software market, with Claude appearing to have an advantage due to its advanced AI-driven features enhancing business decisions, despite Make's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Make offers efficient workflows with automation, drag-and-drop capabilities, comprehensive integration options, and unlimited workflow creation. Claude provides advanced AI-driven analytics, personalized insights, and facilitates rapid code writing and workflow creation, significantly boosting organizational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Make could enhance its API integration and expand support for non-technical users. Claude's pricing may be a barrier for smaller enterprises and could improve user interface intuitiveness and expand its library of integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Make facilitates deployment with user-friendly interfaces and strong support, making it accessible to non-technical teams. Claude offers comprehensive deployment models and robust technical support ensuring smooth integration, with rapid issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Make is cost-effective, offering a low initial cost with significant ROI achieved through its scalability and automation efficiency. Claude, despite its higher pricing, provides substantial long-term returns through AI features, optimizing business growth and justifying the investment for organizations seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Claude for Enterprise vs. Make Report (Updated: June 2026).

Claude for Enterprise vs. Make

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Claude for Enterprise

Ranking in AI Software Development

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Powered Chatbots (2nd), AI Writing Tools (3rd), AI Code Assistants (7th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (4th), AI Proofreading Tools (6th), AI Content Creation (5th), AI Research (2nd)

Make

Ranking in AI Software Development

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Claude for Enterprise is 1.1%, down from 23.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Claude for Enterprise	1.1%
Make	0.5%
Other	98.4%

AI Software Development

Featured Reviews

Chirag Morajkar

Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees

Automation workflows have transformed daily deliveries and now save weeks of development time

The biggest frustration for me regarding Claude for Enterprise is the pricing and credit consumption. Even for small changes, it consumes more credits than any other competitive platform. If there are more credits, the cost increases. I believe that is definitely a factor. Claude for Enterprise has done an exceptional job in delivering all the right things except for the pricing, because it comes with a good amount of cost. If it could ensure that small changes consume fewer credits, that would be helpful. My final thoughts on Claude for Enterprise are that with the growing use of automations, if Claude for Enterprise could come up with a no-code solution—currently it uses credits to code things—but if it could be a drag-and-drop type of solution, as other competitors such as Make.com or n8n offer, I believe that would be a huge advancement. Currently it is usable for even non-technical people, as they just have to use it with prompts, but if it were structured with a drag-and-drop method to create automation, it would be even more cost-effective and faster than coding it and finding the debugging parts.

Read full review

Dinesh Lavu

Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects

Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I rate Claude nine out of ten."

"Claude for Enterprise has positively impacted my organization and my workflow because it has made our shipping very fast, so we are shipping at light speed right now, our products are launching within a week, and our features are being shipped in a day or sometimes even less."

"Claude saves me significant time when conducting research or writing quick Python scripts."

"Claude has positively impacted my organization, as evident from the metrics which show productivity doubling and turnaround time being cut in half."

"Claude for Enterprise has impacted my organization positively a lot; people want to use it, but it's controlled."

"One of the best features Claude for Enterprise offers is that there is no competitor for Claude in creating workflows at a very fast level."

"Make has helped me save my time, and time is money, so obviously, eventually it has helped me save my money as well."

"Make saves me roughly forty-five percent to sixty percent of time since the analysis part and solution are provided below the question."

"The new AI feature that Make has launched is really amazing."

"This has made a very positive impact on my life because initially I was not able to do things quickly and efficiently, but now with the help of Make, I can plan many things that help my work become efficient."

"Every employee used to work manually, and I also used to do manual tasks, now Make does everything automatically."

"This means the task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by reducing our manual workflow and workload by almost twenty to thirty percent, which I feel is great."

"Make has positively impacted my organization by helping me save around 10 plus hours per month to automate reporting and social media posting."

More Make pros

Cons

"The product could be improved by offering automatic integration with other solutions, such as the ability to read Excel or text files and automate processes this way."

"The biggest frustration for me regarding Claude for Enterprise is the pricing and credit consumption."

"Claude for Enterprise could be better because I think it is quite expensive and even after spending $200, there are token limitations that might come up sometimes."

"I face issues with Claude halting or hallucinating occasionally, as it happens with some projects but not all."

"There's limited access to Claude for Enterprise, which means it's restricted in availability."

"The foundational model would have to be improved to be comparable to ChatGPT for everyday use cases."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"Make can be improved in terms of the code module, as sometimes I use it at a developer level, and I want it to be more specific; when using the webhook, some data structures may require a lot of time to organize, so if a code node is available, it would help me structure data effectively."

"Pricing is definitely something that is on a higher tier where we are consuming around 1.5 to 2 million operations per month, which makes the bill quite substantial."

"I give Make a rating of seven because it is not open-sourced and there are many hidden charges, which can affect a beginner's workflow when trying it out."

"Make has helped me save time positively, but I think there is room for improvement in Make as well."

"Sometimes the platform is too laggy and loads slowly."

"One area that needs improvement is the debugging and monitoring."

"There is a file size constraint, as when I try to upload a PDF question bank of 200 pages, it shows an error and the file cannot process the data."

More Make cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

15%

Educational Organization

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Claude?

For an individual user, it is very easy and straightforward. I cannot speak to larger teams.

What needs improvement with Claude?

There's limited access to Claude for Enterprise, which means it's restricted in availability.

What is your primary use case for Claude?

My main use case for Claude for Enterprise is designing, architecting, and coding. I use Claude for Enterprise in design, architecting, and coding by planning modules and programming them via code....

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...

What needs improvement with Make?

I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...

What is your primary use case for Make?

My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.

Cursor vs Claude for Enterprise

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs Claude for Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Windsurf vs Claude for Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

You.com vs Claude for Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

Perplexity vs Claude for Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Claude for Enterprise Competitors

Camunda vs Make

Compared 13% of the time

Pega Platform vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Zapier vs Make

Compared 12% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs Make

Compared 10% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Download Claude for Enterprise product report

Claude for Enterprise

August 2026

Download Make product report

August 2026

Also Known As

Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku, Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5

Integromat

Overview

Claude for Enterprise streamlines workflows by enhancing code writing efficiency, accelerating task completion, and improving accuracy across diverse applications. It offers advanced AI capabilities, aiding professionals in boosting productivity while reducing time-to-market.

Designed with a strong focus on workflow optimization, Claude for Enterprise aids in whiteboarding, debugging, and automation. It supports users with artifact features for data visualization and generates HTML outputs, optimizing tasks like bug resolution and operational workflow management. With multiple agents and plugins, it's ideal for Python scripting and addressing complex inquiries. Users appreciate its effectiveness in email writing, yet point out cost and token limitations as areas for improvement. Enhancements in no-code automation, integration with external tools, and security measures are sought after, along with alignment with ChatGPT's capabilities for daily tasks.

What are the essential features of Claude for Enterprise?

Code Writing Efficiency: Reduces launch times with faster, high-quality coding.
Email Writing Support: Outperforms competitors in drafting accurate emails.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines processes with quick, accurate results.
Data Visualization: Efficiently creates HTML outputs for newsletters.

What benefits should professionals expect?

Enhanced Productivity: Reduces the time required for task completion.
Improved Code Quality: Allows focus on diverse tasks with reliable code generation.
Operation Smoothness: Supports franchisee management with efficient workflows.
Time-to-Market Reduction: Accelerates product development and launches.

In the tech industry, Claude for Enterprise is used for whiteboarding and automation to enhance software development and testing processes. Marketing teams apply data visualization capabilities for effective communication via newsletters, while operational teams benefit from workflow automation in managing complex processes.

Anthropic

Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.

At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.

What features does Make offer?

Visual Workflow Builder: Create and edit workflows effortlessly with a friendly interface.
App Integration: Supports numerous apps, enabling diverse connections.
Real-Time Monitoring: Track workflow executions with precise analytics.
Conditional Logic: Implement logic paths for smarter automations.

What benefits can users expect from Make?

Increased Efficiency: Automating tasks reduces manual intervention, saving time.
Cost Reduction: Lower operational costs with streamlined processes.
Scalable Solutions: Easily adjust workflows to meet growing business demands.
Enhanced Productivity: Focus on high-priority tasks with automated operations.

In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Buan Consulting, Armadia