"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"Our customers also like that they don't have to use multiple modules. Micro Focus and major vendors typically require you to buy several modules and plugins. Our customers do not like that. We offer them a single product for all their monitoring needs."
"The implementation process is very straightforward."
"The solution allows for good integration with other products."
"We have found that Zabbix is more easy to use than other applications."
"Every new asset placed in the environment can be automatically detected, predicting human failures."
"Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months."
"Zabbix is good for discovery."
"The basic setup is very easy."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Zabbix technical support is sold separately."
"Its UI needs to be improved a little bit more so that an end-user is also able to handle it. I can handle it, but others should also be able to handle it in a better way. It becomes complex when we are growing and need to add proxies. We need more scalability features and documentation for different use cases. A lot of articles are available, but they need to be in proper documentation. For example, when you have thousands of servers that have to be monitored in different regions of the world, there should be some kind of documentation to describe how you can create proxies and add them. Sometimes, when you are using the database, it can get overloaded. When the network is growing, the number of transactions becomes very high, and the database gets overloaded. There should be information about how to reduce the load on the MySQL database, which is what Zabbix is using. The market is growing a lot, and it should be enhanced for a lot more things. We are currently bringing enhancements at our end for different use cases. For example, when dockerization is going on, how can we check the logs inside the Dockers. We should also be able to monitor and check the number of logins and add features such as SSO login and two-factor authentication as a protocol. These are the security features and concerns that we have to deal with. Currently, we are developing modules to add features to Zabbix, but they should also work on these features."
"For us, the initial setup was complex"
"Correlation of events would be a wonderful addition."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of doing aggregation from the value or different devices."
"They should open an SSH session from the web interface."
"The graphical user interface could be customized a little bit more, and also the dashboard could be more friendly."
"It could be more stable."
Claroty Platform is ranked 1st in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection with 1 review while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 100 reviews. Claroty Platform is rated 8.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and Armis, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Nagios XI.
We monitor all Cyber-Physical Systems Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
