Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Claroty Platform vs Microsoft Defender for IoT comparison

Claroty and Microsoft are both solutions in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category. Claroty is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.4. Claroty holds a 19.8% mindshare in OT, compared to Microsoft’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Claroty users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Claroty Platform
Read 16 Claroty Platform reviews
  • 6,544 Views
  • 3,992 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Defender for IoT
Read 5 Microsoft Defender for IoT reviews
  • 1,589 Views
  • 1,001 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Claroty Platform and Microsoft Defender for IoT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Claroty Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for IoT Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Claroty Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for IoT
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 880,511 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claroty Platform
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (7th), Vulnerability Management (22nd), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (2nd)
Microsoft Defender for IoT
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
6th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
IoT Security (5th), Microsoft Security Suite (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Claroty Platform is 19.8%, down from 25.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender for IoT is 5.1%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Claroty Platform19.8%
Microsoft Defender for IoT5.1%
Other75.1%
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

AP
AbhishekPandey5
Senior Consultant at Payatu
Passive scanning excels and support proves invaluable
Regarding the cons of the Claroty Platform, it is not about the deployment, but rather the identification. The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site. The Claroty Platform identifies effectively but sometimes identifies many CVEs which might not be the actual issue in certain scenarios.
Read full review
AA
Amr Alaa
Principale Systems Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Effective network monitoring with identified documentation improvements needed
The documentation for Microsoft Defender for IoT is lacking. There are no clear steps or guidance, and updates are frequent, which adds to the confusion. More detailed documentation with video instructions for tasks would be helpful. The system capabilities are not well-documented either. Importing device names and maintaining a list can be cumbersome, as it requires manual input for a large number of devices. The backup and restore process is limited to GUI for backup but lacks a GUI for restore, though future updates might address this. Sentinel documentation is also poor, with limited guidance available.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."
"Claroty identifies all vulnerabilities available in our environment."
"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."
"Their SRA solution, the Secure Remote Access solution, is very useful for industrial environments."
"The tool's best feature was the UI and the simplicity it offers."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"Claroty is very beneficial for learning and adds value to your resume."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."
More Claroty Platform pros
"Mainly, it is manageable and integrates with other Microsoft products, which is crucial for me."
"The graphics and analysis in Microsoft Defender for IoT are very representative."
"I believe it is best suited for cloud services and is unmatched by other cloud security solutions."
"As a cybersecurity consultant, the best part of Microsoft Defender for IoT is the capability to integrate with other tools such as Microsoft Sentinel and receive real-time alerts from the product."
"I find Microsoft Defender very effective in vulnerability management and it provides good attack reduction, making it a next-generation protection solution."
"It is manageable and integrates with other Microsoft products, which is crucial for me."
"Some advantages of Microsoft Defender for IoT are that it's easy to install on any OS, and you can create any custom use cases easily."
 

Cons

"Occasionally, I face a login problem despite entering the correct password."
"The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site."
"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."
"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."
"We face issues in the alert investigation area because it does not properly give the alert communication patterns."
"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."
"I've reported four bugs and three feature requests so far. The main area of focus should be on how attacks are detected. The attack vector information needs to be more detailed. For example, it's not enough to state that an SMB v1 version open can lead to a WannaCry attack. A more detailed explanation should help clients understand the various ways an attack could occur."
"For improvement, I think the training could be more practical. We have external training, but they're mostly theoretical. I want the solution to provide hands-on lab experience to help users learn better."
More Claroty Platform cons
"The only improvement I see is that some detection explanations are vaguely provided by Microsoft, resulting in generic IoT detections that alert me to an issue yet don't specify what's wrong."
"The documentation for Microsoft Defender for IoT is lacking. There are no clear steps or guidance, and updates are frequent, which adds to the confusion."
"The only improvement I see is that some detection explanations are vaguely provided by Microsoft, resulting in generic IoT detections that alert me to an issue yet don't specify what's wrong."
"The primary area that needs improvement is compatibility with the latest IoT technologies."
"There are a few limitations with Microsoft Defender for IoT. We raised concerns with the product team because they don't capture all the information regarding command execution or processes executed on certain endpoints."
"Microsoft Defender for IoT is not scalable. If you want to monitor another industrial network, you need an additional server, making it less scalable."
"Customer service and support from Microsoft are costly. The execution by engineers is expensive, and the service is neither free nor toll-free, making it less accessible for customers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."
"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."
"The tool is quite expensive."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Claroty Platform?
The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?
Regarding the cons of the Claroty Platform, it is not about the deployment, but rather the identification. The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Claroty Platform?
My clients are using the Claroty Platform for asset identification, finding CVEs and threat intel. I am aware of the continuous threat detection feature of the Claroty Platform, and even if it is g...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for IoT?
I find that Microsoft Defender for IoT itself is affordable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for IoT?
I don't think I have any recommendation on improvements for Microsoft Defender for IoT because we don't use it too extensively. There are a few limitations with Microsoft Defender for IoT. We raise...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Defender for IoT?
Clients mainly use Microsoft Defender for IoT for unfamiliar sign-in attempts and Microsoft Defender EDRs. We are using use cases for unfamiliar sign-in and malicious activity, such as user sign-in...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Nozomi Networks vs Claroty Platform Logo
Nozomi Networks vs Claroty Platform
Compared 27% of the time
Armis vs Claroty Platform Logo
Armis vs Claroty Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Dragos vs Claroty Platform Logo
Dragos vs Claroty Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Tenable OT Security vs Claroty Platform Logo
Tenable OT Security vs Claroty Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Claroty Platform Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Claroty Platform
Compared 3% of the time
More Claroty Platform Competitors
Nozomi Networks vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Nozomi Networks vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 25% of the time
Azure Sphere vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Azure Sphere vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 10% of the time
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 7% of the time
Tenable OT Security vs Microsoft Defender for IoT Logo
Tenable OT Security vs Microsoft Defender for IoT
Compared 6% of the time
More Microsoft Defender for IoT Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Claroty Platform
January 2026
Claroty Platform reportDownload Claroty Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender for IoT
January 2026
Microsoft Defender for IoT reportDownload Microsoft Defender for IoT product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Azure Defender for IoT
 

Overview

The Claroty Platform is tailored for monitoring and securing industrial control systems. It offers deep visibility into OT networks, enabling effective anomaly detection and vulnerability assessments. Its user-friendly interface and robust reporting tools facilitate easy management and compliance, enhancing organizational efficiency and cybersecurity posture in industrial environments.

Claroty

Microsoft Defender for IoT offers advanced security designed to protect IoT environments from sophisticated threats. Its deep integration with Azure reinforces security across devices and networks.

Microsoft Defender for IoT provides scalable threat detection and security intelligence tailored for IoT devices. Leveraging cloud-powered analytics, it ensures protection against emerging threats while supporting diverse device landscapes. The platform's compatibility with Azure Sentinel offers robust security operations and management capabilities.

What are the core features of Microsoft Defender for IoT?
  • Threat Intelligence: Provides real-time insights and threat detection using cloud-powered analytics.
  • Device Management: Simplifies the monitoring and management of IoT devices across networks.
  • Integrated Security: Seamlessly integrates with Azure Sentinel for comprehensive security operations.
What benefits and ROI should users consider?
  • Improved Security Posture: Strengthens the protection of IoT ecosystems against cyber threats.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces the complexities and costs associated with managing IoT security.
  • Scalability: Supports growth and adaptation to expanding IoT networks.

In manufacturing, Microsoft Defender for IoT aids in maintaining operational efficiency by preventing unauthorized access to industrial control systems. Healthcare providers utilize it to protect sensitive patient data transmitted through connected devices. Retailers benefit from secure management of inventory systems and customer data across smart devices.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Claroty Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for IoT
December 2025
Free Report: Claroty Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for IoT
Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for IoT and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Claroty Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for IoT report.
See our list of best Operational Technology (OT) Security vendors.

We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.