Cisco UCS Director vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Cisco and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while Kovai.co is ranked #54. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Kovai.co’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 14 Cisco UCS Director reviews

595 Views
559 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

493 Views
108 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

```html

Cisco UCS Director and Turbo360 are competing products in IT infrastructure management. Cisco UCS Director holds an advantage in data comparisons, particularly in support and scalability, while Turbo360 appears attractive for organizations seeking advanced capabilities due to its innovative features.

Features: Cisco UCS Director is known for robust automation, orchestration, and comprehensive workflow management, simplifying data center management. Turbo360 focuses on serverless architecture management with integrated monitoring and diagnostics, efficiently handling cloud applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Director offers a flexible deployment model with a steeper learning curve alongside strong customer service for ongoing support. Turbo360 provides an intuitive deployment model with prompt setup, easier for teams without deep technical expertise, and responsive customer service to enhance user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Director often involves higher setup costs but offers substantial long-term ROI for large-scale infrastructure environments. Turbo360 delivers significant ROI with competitive upfront costs, especially for startups and SMEs optimizing cloud-based operations, with pricing determined by specific infrastructure needs and budget constraints.

```

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Cloud Management

54th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (71st), Cloud Monitoring Software (49th), Cloud Cost Management (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair

Solution Architect and Senior Consultant at Keysight Technologies

Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement

Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.

Read full review

reviewer1868589

Python Engineer at Msys Technologies

Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits

Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications. One more thing to note is that their support team was always ready to clear all our doubts regarding the product but we feel that it would be much appreciated if they could share with us the required resources to get new customers like us well-versed in traversing through different modules of the product. These are the very few areas where Serverless360 can be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features."

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"An easy and strong configuration, along with its low cost, are some of the features of the solution."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

Cons

"The areas where this product can be improved are the integrations and the UI. These features are not as friendly compared to VMware products."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

40%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 54% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 29% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 16% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 57% of the time

Grafana vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 43% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

July 2025

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

July 2025

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Serverless360

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

Our Core features:

Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.

Kovai.co

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

July 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Director vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Director vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.