Cisco UCS Director vs Freshservice comparison

Cisco and Freshworks are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7, while Freshworks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. Cisco holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Freshworks’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Freshworks users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

602 Views
572 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Freshservice

Read 35 Freshservice reviews

2,669 Views
133 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Freshservice

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Freshservice and Cisco UCS Director compete in the IT management software category, each excelling in distinct areas. Freshservice appears to have the upper hand in user experience and ease of use, while Cisco UCS Director is favored for its orchestration and automation, particularly in Cisco environments.

Features: Freshservice is known for its user-friendly interface, excellent incident management, and robust analytics capabilities. It provides flexible and customizable workflows, strong asset management, and seamless mobile access. Cisco UCS Director offers comprehensive orchestration, seamless multi-cloud management, and tight integration with Cisco and third-party solutions, focusing on centralized infrastructure management and automation features.

Room for Improvement: Freshservice users suggest enhancements in reporting and search functionality, as well as improved customization options for user forms. There are also calls for better project management tools and smoother integration with Outlook. Cisco UCS Director users would like to see a more intuitive user interface, better integration with non-Cisco solutions, and improved navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Freshservice is praised for its quick cloud-based deployment and flexible cloud options, although opinions on its technical support vary, indicating potential improvements in communication and resolution efficiency. Cisco UCS Director, typically deployed on-premises, is valued for its centralized management capabilities, though its interface complexity can hinder ease of use. It receives good feedback on technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Freshservice offers competitive and flexible pricing models. It is considered cost-effective for small to mid-sized companies, although it may become expensive at higher pricing tiers. Users report positive ROI due to enhanced IT operation visibility and efficiency. Cisco UCS Director is often criticized for its high price and perceived lack of cost-effectiveness, mainly given the specialized expertise and setup required. It suits specialized Cisco environments but demands significant investment for broader implementation.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,358 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Freshservice

Ranking in Cloud Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (7th), Project Management Software (9th), IT Asset Management (6th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Freshservice is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Freshservice	0.5%
Cisco UCS Director	1.4%
Other	98.1%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair

Solution Architect and Senior Consultant at Keysight Technologies

Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement

Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.

Read full review

Trilochana Gouda

IT manager at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Smooth incident management and easy to use while needing better escalation management

We are using Freshservice for the IT ticketing system for business users We use the ticketing system primarily, which is very easy to use for all users. Freshservice is helpful, especially in incident management. Incident management is very helpful, and the system is straightforward, making it…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

"The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features."

"An easy and strong configuration, along with its low cost, are some of the features of the solution."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"With Freshservice in place, we have reversed the trend of creating tickets."

"We use the ticketing system primarily, which is very easy to use for all users."

"Depending on the size of your organization, is pretty standard and useful."

"The solution’s timely automated triggers increase our IT team’s productivity."

"The solution facilitates a transition from an organizational structure that is function-based to a process-oriented approach."

"Freshservice is very user-friendly and easy to customize."

"The solution has been very helpful engineering insights into the client's environment. We have been able to manage calls and incidence very efficiently which provides us with a clear understanding of the system warranty and the actions that we might need to take in terms of insights. The system is very dynamic and prevents any kind of over sides which is yours that there is smooth contract management. Also we can easily uphold SLAs and deliver enhanced services without breaching any agreements."

"It has reduced the time to look up who is responsible for a service, and it has reduced the time to finalize a service request because it now goes directly to the person who is responsible for the service in that location. So, a service request is handled quickly and directly by the person responsible for it."

More Freshservice pros

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"It is not easy to add or expand the product."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

"The areas where this product can be improved are the integrations and the UI. These features are not as friendly compared to VMware products."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"On the reporting side, when we were doing reporting, one thing that was a bit of a limitation was when you had a data list containing a list of changes that have occurred for the whole time and you had to fit the list onto a page. If the list went over the page, it would just truncate it at the page. You wouldn't get all your data. So, it didn't work. That was one big stand-out for me. What we tended to do was convert things into a more readable format, and then we had more targeted exception reporting, but it would be nice to have a full list of things that could be automatically generated and that can flow over pages."

"I think it would be great if the tool had another version that is more customizable. From what I remember, there were some limitations regarding the number of assets you could track. In a more robust version, the number of assets increases, but I think it would be better to have something more customizable for all versions, especially the most robust version. This would be great for larger customers."

"The ability to customize the user interface is a bit lacking, and the reporting is a bit lacking because they're very stringent upon what you can pull reporting-wise within Freshservice. They have a lot of built-in reports that are very nice, but when it comes to customizing these, they just provide you with certain data. When you try to build your own report wizard, you aren't able to go and select some of the data that is shown in some of the reports that come with Freshservice. This is something that we have brought up with our account representative, and we have suggested these as feature updates in the future. We're still waiting on them to go and implement something like that."

"Asset management can definitely be improved because it doesn't pick up every single device on the network or every single piece of information. Some manual information still needs to be entered."

"There is a need for improvement in terms of automatic escalation to the next level if an issue is not resolved."

"I experienced some delay in response time for non-function critical queries."

"Not integrated with Google."

"It's hard to interact directly with the users themselves."

More Freshservice cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"Our licensing fee for Freshservice is $2,500 a year."

"Freshservice is a fairly cheap solution. Though monthly payments can be made towards the licensing costs of the solution, my company prefers to make annual payments."

"The price of Freshservice could improve, it is expensive."

"It was a middle tier. It wasn't an expensive one. It was a tier model usage. Licensing costs varied between admin users and regular users."

"The cost at the current timing is very reasonable but as the product gains popularity, I anticipate it might become expensive. Fortunately my customers have been offered a generous discount making it more affordable for me and satisfying both my needs and customers requirement."

"We're basically paying about $100 USD per agent per month."

"The solution may be around 20,000 euros a year."

"It is $34 per license, per agent. Currently, we don't see any add-ons at extra fees."

More Freshservice pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

19%

University

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Freshservice?

The solution has been very helpful engineering insights into the client's environment. We have been able to manage calls and incidence very efficiently which provides us with a clear understanding...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Freshservice?

The solution offers flat licensing and appears to be cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Freshservice?

There is a need for improvement in terms of automatic escalation to the next level if an issue is not resolved. It should optimize and allow customization. Additionally, asset management needs impr...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 31% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 28% of the time

Morpheus vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 11% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 10% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

ServiceNow vs Freshservice

Compared 20% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Freshservice

Compared 9% of the time

Zendesk vs Freshservice

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs Freshservice

Compared 6% of the time

HaloITSM vs Freshservice

Compared 6% of the time

More Freshservice Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

October 2025

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Freshservice

October 2025

Download Freshservice product report

Also Known As

No data available

Flint

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Freshservice is an intelligent, cloud-native service management solution. It provides efficiency and agility through AI to create a contextual and intelligent experience. The solution also empowers employees to work whenever and wherever they need to work. Freshservice powers integrations and workflows at the enterprise scale, building upon an open platform and marketplace with connectors and APIs that you can extend and customize.

Freshservice Features

Freshservice has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

ITIL-aligned processes
Intelligent AI/ML capabilities
Advanced CSAT
Extensible platform
Self-service portal
Smart automations
Service catalog
Effective monitoring and alerting
Out-of-box analytics
Mobile app
Marketplace apps

Freshservice Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Freshservice. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Intelligent service management and customized workflows: Freshservice offers powered bots, automation, and orchestration to help you make management more efficient and gives you the ability to customize all workflows.

Fast time-to-value: Freshservice’s out-of-the-box features help you quickly deploy it and enable easier adoption, at scale.

Minimizes downtime: Freshservice prevents critical issues by identifying the right alerts, collaborating with context, and delivering an enhanced end-user experience.

Extensible: The solution is extensible and allows organizations to access enterprise-scale tools to customize, integrate, and automate business workflows.

Support: Freshservice has 24/7 support so your issues can be addressed around-the-clock.

Boosts productivity: The Freshservice solution helps improve employee productivity. It helps you prioritize work better with real-time custom dashboards.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Freshservice solution.

A Senior Helpdesk at a non-profit says, “I like the workflow automation capabilities, where based upon certain actions, it will automatically go and route tickets to a particular person. It is fairly user-friendly.”

PeerSpot user Cesar Q., CIO at Grupo Kasto, mentions, “The analytics are very good. The solution offers very nice incident management. The overall functionality of the product is excellent. The change management is helpful. They have an agent that we installed in every single asset. We have the inventory for all assets automatically. Contract management is very valuable for us as an IT department, as we have the information for every single computer across the company. We are starting to use the project management aspects right now. We have different projects and we have all the information in the same solution, in the same place. It makes everything more centralized and easier to access. The user interface is very nice and the solution is easy to use. You don't need to be an expert in order to navigate around and use the product. You don't need to read a lot of manuals in order to figure everything out. It's pretty intuitive.”

A Network Analyst at a real estate/law firm shares, "We find its ability to track what's going on with each request very valuable. We are also able to merge ticket requests and assign them to different groups in the company. We have another department that uses the same system."

Freshworks

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Western Carriers, Judson University, Golf Canada, Travix, Proxama, Paymentez, Ready Auto Transport

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

871,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.