Cisco UCS Director vs Freshservice comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Freshworks are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while Freshworks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Cisco holds a 1.6% mindshare in CM, compared to Freshworks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Freshworks users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

2,851 Views
2,708 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Freshservice

Read 40 Freshservice reviews

12,549 Views
1,757 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Freshservice

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Freshservice and Cisco UCS Director compete in the IT management software category, each excelling in distinct areas. Freshservice appears to have the upper hand in user experience and ease of use, while Cisco UCS Director is favored for its orchestration and automation, particularly in Cisco environments.

Features: Freshservice is known for its user-friendly interface, excellent incident management, and robust analytics capabilities. It provides flexible and customizable workflows, strong asset management, and seamless mobile access. Cisco UCS Director offers comprehensive orchestration, seamless multi-cloud management, and tight integration with Cisco and third-party solutions, focusing on centralized infrastructure management and automation features.

Room for Improvement: Freshservice users suggest enhancements in reporting and search functionality, as well as improved customization options for user forms. There are also calls for better project management tools and smoother integration with Outlook. Cisco UCS Director users would like to see a more intuitive user interface, better integration with non-Cisco solutions, and improved navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Freshservice is praised for its quick cloud-based deployment and flexible cloud options, although opinions on its technical support vary, indicating potential improvements in communication and resolution efficiency. Cisco UCS Director, typically deployed on-premises, is valued for its centralized management capabilities, though its interface complexity can hinder ease of use. It receives good feedback on technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Freshservice offers competitive and flexible pricing models. It is considered cost-effective for small to mid-sized companies, although it may become expensive at higher pricing tiers. Users report positive ROI due to enhanced IT operation visibility and efficiency. Cisco UCS Director is often criticized for its high price and perceived lack of cost-effectiveness, mainly given the specialized expertise and setup required. It suits specialized Cisco environments but demands significant investment for broader implementation.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,749 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

26th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Freshservice

Ranking in Cloud Management

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (6th), Project Management Software (14th), IT Asset Management (7th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Configuration Management Databases (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (14th), AI IT Support (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Freshservice is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Freshservice	1.3%
Cisco UCS Director	1.6%
Other	97.1%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

ErnieRumfield

Senior Telecommunications Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing extensive VoIP services becomes efficient and seamless

We use Cisco UCS Director primarily for managing our VoIP service to maintain seamless service delivery. We operate in an enterprise government environment Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate. It helps save time by making it quicker to roll out new call…

Read full review

Raja Farrar

IT Service Delivery Manager at Symposiam

Automation and AI have transformed our service delivery and have made IT support faster and more efficient

I always keep up with Freshservice's roadmaps and new features. Freshservice has been very good at listening to feedback and adding those feature requests into their next iterations. I wish they would offer more granular data export options for utilizing in Power BI, along with predictive analytics for capacity planning and SLA breaches to enable more proactive support management and reduce firefighting. While the dashboards are effective, some users find custom reporting limited compared to ServiceNow or Jira. I would also appreciate deeper integrations, especially for niche apps requiring development coding work to enable advanced orchestration. Native integrations for DevOps pipelines such as GitHub Actions and Jenkins, along with stronger API flexibility for complex workflows, would enhance functionality. Although the CMDB and asset management are solid, they do lack advanced dependency mapping compared to other enterprise tools. My wishlist includes automated impact analysis for changes and improved visualization of asset relationships, enabling quicker resolutions from an agent's perspective when alerts come in. I acknowledge that Device42 may enhance this, but it is an extra cost beyond what we already pay. While Freddy AI is excellent for triage and suggestions, some users desire more proactive automation, such as predictive ticket routing based on historical patterns and AI-driven capacity forecasting. Lastly, the pricing tiers might seem rigid for mid-sized teams, so a more granular add-on option for features such as Device42 or pay-per-use for orchestration workflows could be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else."

"Better visibility and better control are the main benefits people receive from Cisco UCS Director; the automation and the orchestration part, these three to four points are the key factors to decide on Cisco UCS Director."

"Without UCS Director it wouldn't be possible for us to go from receiving shipments at a data center to having systems live in production in a matter of days, or sometimes hours, instead of waiting weeks."

"The reason we went with Cisco is that it comes at a very negligible cost as part of the BOQ. Compared to the competition's products, which are incredibly expensive, UCS Director is low-cost."

"The technical support for this solution is very good, at least in our region."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"I would recommend this solution to others because it simplifies a lot of tasks via orchestration."

"The improvement for our organization has really been ease of use; we'd be a mess without the solution."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"It has reduced the time to look up who is responsible for a service, and it has reduced the time to finalize a service request because it now goes directly to the person who is responsible for the service in that location. So, a service request is handled quickly and directly by the person responsible for it."

"I would recommend this solution to others because it is good and the price is reasonable."

"Its ease of use is fantastic. It is just above and beyond, especially when you compare it to something like Cherwell, Salesforce, or anything like that. It is on its own level. It is so easy to administer. The way everything is organized and the way it builds its own documentation is very good."

"The stability is pretty solid; we've never had major outages or any workflow issues that weren't caused by an administrative error, and it's been pretty stable as far as a ticketing platform is concerned."

"We found the initial setup to be very simple."

"You can just register and within five to minute minutes, you are ready to go."

"What I have seen in Freshservice is there's no room for customization. Which works as an advantage in some cases and it works as a disadvantage in others. If you are someone that starts managing your IT services, it is a great solution, because there's no way to go out away from the direction of the system. You have to follow the process as it was intended for the designers of a solution because there's no room for customization or configuration."

"With Freshservice in place, we have reversed the trend of creating tickets."

More Freshservice pros

Cons

"The solution could be improved is including a feature where I could do things programmatically versus having to create workarounds to get what I want to get done."

"The user interface could use improvement."

"Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems."

"I would like to see more flexibility when it comes to managing other stacks, like VMware virtualization."

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"I experienced some delay in response time for non-function critical queries."

"It is 80% stable. Some users face issues in Chrome and Firefox."

"The reporting and management information (MI) are very limited, and stopped realistic and timely reporting on outstanding incidents."

"Freshservice can be improved by enhancing Asset Management or CMDB accuracy."

"Not integrated with Google."

"The analytics could be better."

"The product should look at BCM or ServiceNow and see if there are features that would make nice additions. It would help them stay competitive."

"It would be good to have the product integrated with Google because that's our corporate tool of choice."

More Freshservice cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"It was a middle tier. It wasn't an expensive one. It was a tier model usage. Licensing costs varied between admin users and regular users."

"Its price is great. Its pricing is supposedly a lot less than ServiceNow and other alternatives."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"One of the key benefits of Freshservice is license management. Asset management has the possibility to keep track of licenses and that's very useful. The price of the solution is very good."

"I don't think it's expensive for the US or some European markets. Still, when I used Freshservice in Mexico, some customers found it a bit pricey, especially considering the platform's features. I think the pricing is fair for use in the European market, but it might be perceived differently in Latin America."

"We're basically paying about $100 USD per agent per month."

"Freshservice price is competitive, it is not more than other solutions on the market."

"The solution may be around 20,000 euros a year."

More Freshservice pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?

Mainly in my region and country, large data center customers are using Cisco UCS Director, not the SMB or mid-market customers. More of the on-premise customers are utilizing Cisco UCS Director. Th...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Freshservice?

I cannot comment much on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Freshservice as it was already preset up in my company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Freshservice?

I believe Freshservice can be improved by offering more advanced features and customizability. In terms of improvements, I suggest enhancing performance for larger networks and addressing workflow ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Freshservice?

In Freshservice, I typically use it for day-to-day tasks. A quick, specific example of how I use Freshservice in my daily work includes getting some incidents, working on service requests, and hand...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 12% of the time

Spacelift vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 4% of the time

Abiquo vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

ServiceNow vs Freshservice

Compared 9% of the time

Zendesk vs Freshservice

Compared 6% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Freshservice

Compared 5% of the time

Samanage vs Freshservice

Compared 4% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs Freshservice

Compared 3% of the time

More Freshservice Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

November 2026

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Freshservice

November 2026

Download Freshservice product report

Also Known As

No data available

Flint

Overview

Cisco UCS Director simplifies centralized management with a user-friendly interface, focusing on multi-cloud management, integration, and strong API support. It aims to provide comprehensive control and visibility across diverse environments.

Renowned for ease of use and deployment, Cisco UCS Director offers automation and orchestration capabilities, enabling workflow generation in private and hybrid clouds. It allows centralized control of UCS blades, VoIP services, and infrastructure while facilitating upgrades and traffic management in large data centers. Users benefit from its capability for self-service provisioning and third-party product integration. Despite strengths, improvements in interface simplicity, scalability, third-party integration, and cloud-based architecture could enhance its appeal.

What are the most important features?

Multi-Cloud Management: Simplifies operations across different cloud environments.
Integration with Cisco Solutions: Ensures seamless connection within Cisco's ecosystem.
Strong API Support: Facilitates custom integrations and extensions.
Single Pane of Glass Manageability: Provides comprehensive visibility and control.
Automation and Orchestration: Streamlines processes and tasks efficiently.
Cost-Effectiveness: Supports budget-conscious operations without compromising functionality.
Security: Prioritizes data safety and network security.
Fabric Sharing: Improves resource utilization and flexibility.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks, reducing operational complexity.
Deployment Efficiency: Accelerates implementation across data centers.
Enhanced Visibility: Improves oversight of IT infrastructure.
Cost Management: Achieves savings through efficient resource utilization.
Scalability: Supports growth with adaptable infrastructure management.
Comprehensive Control: Centralizes control to enhance management.

IT organizations use Cisco UCS Director to automate and orchestrate deployments in diverse sectors, including telecommunications for VoIP service enhancement and in large data centers for infrastructure management. It supports web service apps, database integration, and facilitates upgrades, making it ideal for enterprises seeking streamlined processes and better resource management.

Cisco

Freshservice specializes in user-friendliness and seamless integration, facilitating IT operations with AI-driven ticketing and flexible asset management, essential for diverse organizations.

Known for its comprehensive automation and integration with platforms like AWS, Freshservice enhances IT tasks with flexible workflows and intuitive dashboards. Its self-service portal and effective incident management promote efficient service delivery and SLA compliance, making it vital for IT teams. However, users seek enhanced customization and integration with Microsoft and Google, along with improved analytics and project management features.

What are the essential features of Freshservice?

User-friendliness: Simplifies IT processes with intuitive design.
Comprehensive automation: Optimizes operations through streamlined processes.
AI-powered ticketing: Enhances ticket management with intelligent solutions.
Seamless integration: Connects with platforms like AWS and SolarWinds for efficient workflows.
Flexible workflows and asset management: Adapts to diverse IT needs for better service delivery.

What benefits should users consider in Freshservice reviews?

Streamlined IT operations: Simplifies and speeds up service processes.
Improved SLA compliance: Enhances adherence to service level agreements through efficient management.
Increased service delivery: Boosts the quality and efficiency of services provided.
Visibility across departments: Provides clear tracking and management of service requests and assets.

Freshservice is widely implemented in IT service management, supporting ticketing, incident management, and change management. It assists in customer service, internal support, and integrates with Azure and AWS. Significant for HR service centers and knowledge bases, it enables workflow automation and reporting, centralizing service operations for enhanced visibility and tracking across departments.

Freshworks

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Western Carriers, Judson University, Golf Canada, Travix, Proxama, Paymentez, Ready Auto Transport

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice

November 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,749 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Director vs. Freshservice report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.