We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Endpoint and ESET Endpoint Encryption based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business)."Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"This is stable and scalable."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The stability is very good."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"If somebody has been compromised, the question always is: How has it affected other devices in the network? Cisco AMP gives you a very neat view of that."
"The best feature that we found most valuable, is actually the security product for the endpoint, formerly known as AMP. It has behavioral analytics, so you can be more proactive toward zero-day threats. I found that quite good."
"There are no issues or drops in the solution's performance...The solution's technical support was helpful."
"The VPN is most valuable. It's the best thing in the market today. We can use two-factor authentication with another platform, and we can authenticate with two-factor."
"It is extensive in terms of providing visibility and insights into threats. It allows for research into a threat, and you can chart your progress on how you're resolving it."
"Any alert that we get is an actionable alert. Immediately, there is information that we can just click through, see the point in time, what happened, what caused it, and what automatic actions were taken. We can then choose to take any manual actions, if we want, or start our investigation. We're no longer looking at digging into information or wading through hundreds of incidents. There's a list which says where the status is assigned, e.g., under investigation or investigation finished. That is all in the console. It has taken away a lot of the administration, which we would normally be doing, and integrated it into the console for us."
"The ability to detonate a particular problem in a sandbox environment and understand what the effects are, is helpful. We're trying, for example, to determine, when people send information in, if an attachment is legitimate or not. You just have to open it. If you can do that in a secure sandbox environment, that's an invaluable feature. What you would do otherwise would be very risky and tedious."
"The most valuable feature is signature-based malware detection."
"This solution can be centrally managed."
"The product is easy to implement and configure."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The usability is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is done on the server."
"The most valuable feature of ESET Endpoint Encryption is its rate of capturing viruses and malware."
"ESET Endpoint Encryption works as an antivirus system."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The support needs improvement."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The solution needs more in-depth analytics."
"The product does not provide options like tunnel creation or virtual appliances."
"It could be improved in connection with artificial intelligence and IoT."
"I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails."
"I would recommend that the solution offer more availability in terms of the product portfolio and integration with third-party products."
"Integration and dashboard are areas with certain shortcomings in Cisco Secure Endpoint."
"An easier way to do deduplication of machines, or be alerted to the fact that there's more than one instance of a machine, would be useful... That way you could get a more accurate device count, so you're not having an inflated number."
"The Linux agent is a simple offline classic agent, and it doesn't support Secure Boot, which is important to have on a Linux machine. The Linux agent has conflicts with other solutions, including the Exploit Prevention system found in Windows servers. We didn't find a fix during troubleshooting, and Cisco couldn't offer one either. Eventually, we had to shut down the Exploit Prevention system. We didn't like that as we always want a solution that can fit smoothly into the setup without causing problems, especially where security is concerned. The tool also caused CPU spikes on our production machine, and we were seriously considering moving to another product."
"Sometimes the server console is very slow, so the performance could be improved."
"Integration with central management needs improvement."
"The overall compatibility of the device is an area where the solution lacks."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"I would like more robust reporting as part of the Remote Administrator."
"There should be more frequent updates."
"There could be an option for users to restart the system without a password."
"From an admin perspective, the solution's UI could be more user-friendly."
Cisco Secure Endpoint is ranked 10th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 43 reviews while ESET Endpoint Encryption is ranked 5th in Endpoint Encryption with 12 reviews. Cisco Secure Endpoint is rated 8.6, while ESET Endpoint Encryption is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Endpoint writes "Single dashboard management, quick infrastructure threat detection, and high level support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Encryption writes "A reasonably priced solution that is an easy-to-use and effective at the same time". Cisco Secure Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, whereas ESET Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Sophos SafeGuard, Symantec Endpoint Encryption and WinMagic SecureDoc.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.