Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL] vs Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Cisco and Infoblox solutions aren't in the same category. Infoblox is ranked #4 in DS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Infoblox users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL] and Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Zscaler and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG).

To learn more, read our detailed Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 918,970 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

Samir Shah

CEO / Managing Director at Infinity Access Technologies Pvt Ltd

Easy to implement with good security and scanning

The software is scalable, no doubt about that. As such, the customers that we have given this software to had previously scaled up. Still, with a new version, we were able to satisfy them without any issue. Cisco is continuously working on making the software better, stronger, and compliant with the latest vulnerabilities. Their main aspect is to have software or hardware that is scalable. There is never an issue with the scalability. I'd rate it five out of five in terms of the ability to scale. This is a data center, so there are a lot of services that are being accessed from different departments. As far as users are concerned, they don't have more users within the data center. However, when it comes to accessing various services from the data center, it is sizeable. There may be 4,000 service requests happening daily. There may not be more than 50 users in general.

Read full review

Amr Shawky

Security & Infra Technology Specialist at BARQ Systems

Replaces internal DNS servers effectively with strong support for network security

For users not already working with Infoblox, it is advisable to present it as a centralized integrated solution to handle DNS IPAM. Not all customers understand DNS security threats, so emphasizing its importance is crucial. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection as ten for the overall solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would definitely recommend iboss for web filtering purposes to other organizations or individuals."

"Valuable features: Within the filter: Controls (Web categories, applications, and Allow/Block list) and Network (local Subnets). Within the reporter: Logs (Event Log) and Reports."

"The students were always protected, and the content filtering worked very well, seeming to work better than other products we had tried previously."

"iboss is easy to use despite its complexity. Multiple engineers manage it, but it's significantly more straightforward to administer than traditional VPNs and web proxies."

"Iboss is a solution that prevents advanced persistent threats, and has a zero tolerance for attacks."

"Its initial setup was straightforward."

"The main advantage of iboss is its cloud-based security centralized policy management, which helps organizations protect users working from different locations, secure access to cloud applications, and reduce security risks."

"The console is cloud-based, which is something I really appreciate."

More iboss pros

"It is valuable to be able to block whole categories or groups at one time."

"It is an easy solution to implement, the web security is great, the filtering of different URLs has been very helpful, it also acts as a firewall which is quite helpful in terms of security, we've used it for content scanning and filtration in the data center, since this is on the cloud the cost has gone down, it's got good features and is easily manageable, and Cisco is rather well-known and robust."

"The cyber security features they offer are most trusted."

"The solution is super stable because it is made up of a bunch of mega proxies."

"The web security is great."

"The most valuable feature of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is its performance and visibility."

"Infoblox DNS Protection provides complete DDI solutions, allowing customers to easily manage their IP addresses and integrate them with DNSSEC and DSCP."

"I like that Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is one hundred percent good, performance-wise."

"Infoblox Secure DNS helped us protect our internal environment by mitigating and stopping attacks through the Internet using DNS protocols and queries."

"Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is considered a mandatory DNS solution in the banking sector in Egypt as it has a significant impact on the industry."

"The security of the solution is perfect. It's very good at protecting us from attacks."

"Infoblox's render scalability and technical support for the DNAT firewalling adaptation are seen as top benefits."

"DHCP is a basic service, and they've been doing it for years, so it's mature and stable."

More Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection pros

Cons

"The reporting feature needs improvement. It doesn't give you the expected results. It is quite difficult to get the specific reports needed, and it is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform."

"The endpoint-type solution is an area that needs some improvement."

"Fold that in with the risk intelligence they're getting from all of the different subscriptions they are a part of. Now, these security companies subscribe to things like emerging threats, databases, etc. You can fold all this intelligence to decide what's happening on an endpoint. I would love to see them start moving into that space. That would compete directly with Microsoft. Maybe that's why they haven't. Having that ability native within the solution would be great. The other area in which I would love to see improvement is more detailed descriptions of why they block websites."

"If they could implement an extra security layer preventing access to iboss from the open internet, it would be great."

"The easiest device I have set up was the Barracuda line of products."

"Sometimes when you call in support, you get someone who is just following a sheet. It feels like a runaround. You feel that you are running into that support wall."

"Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern."

"To scale up, a new iboss Node Blade Chassis must be purchased."

More iboss cons

"Cisco has good technical support although sometimes our clients would like it to be better in some areas."

"The solution is not supported because it is legacy and almost out of market."

"Setup is not that difficult, but it really requires proper technical training."

"The licensing could be better. They are an expensive product."

"The solution is expensive."

"The service monitoring information could be simplified of this appliance and the information displayed on the dashboards could be improved. I have not found one dashboard to be perfect. For example, in Splunk, I can create a dashboard in Grafana. However, in Grafana, it takes a very long time to create them. There should be another API to do it better."

"There is a steep learning curve to be able to use Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection well."

"The portal for technical knowledge for Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection needs improvement. It is not very rich and could use enhancement."

"The overall pricing of Infoblox is high, particularly for the Bangladesh market, and the licensing model is challenging."

"One challenging aspect of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection pricing for the integrator is the difficulty of estimating the cost after the initial presentation, particularly in relation to the company's size."

"They are not supporting high query logging. They have a very limited size for the syslog, so they are usually asking for external storage, external network, and integration in order to keep the syslog. If you are considering the high volume traffic of the carrier-grade, then the syslog will hold for around five to 10 minutes. This is not enough time and it is being rotated. This is the main issue and the main limitation that we face with them that they need to work on."

"Infoblox DNS is much more expensive than DNSSEC, which is offered by other vendors. Customers should consider the cost of DNSSEC since it is a significant factor."

More Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

Information not available

"The solution is expensive."

"There are no additional costs to the standard licensing price of the solution."

"The price of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection could be reduced, it is expensive."

"Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is a little more expensive than other vendors."

"I am not sure about the price of the solution, but I heard it is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

I think iboss could be improved by emphasizing the modular function even more during sales presentations and demonstr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

iboss is primarily used for content filtering within school districts and public K-12 school districts, and it can al...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

The pricing and licensing for iboss were reasonable for the security features. The setup costs were manageable, thoug...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection?

The main issue with Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection is its higher price compared to other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection?

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection can be improved by having more customer support. I think it can have a more lab faci...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection?

The main use case for Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection would be DNS spoofing. I use Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL]

Compared 20% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense vs Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Secure Web Gateway vs Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL] Competitors

Cisco Umbrella vs Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection

Compared 10% of the time

EfficientIP DNS Guardian vs Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection

Compared 8% of the time

EfficientIP DNS Firewall vs Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks DNS Security vs Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection

Compared 7% of the time

F5 BIG-IP DNS vs Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

October 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

September 2026

Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL] report

Download Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection

October 2026

Download Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

ScanSafe Web Security SaaS

Infoblox Secure DNS

Overview

iboss is the Zero Trust SASE platform that gives organizations complete visibility and governance over their AI, data, and applications through one unified platform, one console, one policy engine, and one data lake.

Your endpoints may already stop malware. Your data and application activity can still be invisible. iboss decrypts and understands every connection, then turns that signal into answers security leaders can act on.

The platform leads with three capabilities in this order: AI Security and Visibility, Data Security and Visibility, and App Visibility and Control. Zero Trust Network Access, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN sit underneath as the access fabric that carries those three. Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

- AI Security and Visibility: conversation capture, shadow-AI discovery, AI DLP, and agent governance across Claude, Co-Work, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and emerging services.

- Data Security and Visibility: full SSL/TLS decryption, deep content inspection, MIP label compliance, and one-click compliance reporting.

- App Visibility and Control: signatureless CASB, dual risk scoring, in-app controls, and SSPM for major SaaS.

- Containerized Zero Trust SASE: dedicated containers, isolated SSL keys, one console, one policy engine, one data lake.

- Access fabric: ZTNA, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN under the same platform.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

- Complete visibility over AI, data, and applications from one platform instead of separate point tools.

- Encrypted traffic is inspected by default so data decisions use content and context together.

- Shadow SaaS and new web tools appear as they are used, with enforceable controls in one console.

- Native data sovereignty through dedicated containers, in-region inspection, and per-customer SSL key custody.

- Scale proven in published materials: 10M+ users, 100+ countries, 150B+ transactions, 2.5B+ threats blocked.

Economic buyers are CISOs, CIOs, and VPs of Security. Champions include security architects, network and infrastructure leaders, SecOps, and GRC. Primary segments: enterprise and business, financial services, government (including FedRAMP Gov Cloud), healthcare, manufacturing, legal and professional services, retail and hospitality, and MSP/MSSP partners. Education, including K-12, is one vertical among these.

iboss

Cisco ScanSafe is a cloud hosted web filtering service which enables you to create, enforce and monitor Web usage policies. Layering real time rule-based filters with up-to-date and accurate categorization database, Web Filtering enforces your organization's acceptable usage policy, protecting you from the legal liabilities of inappropriate content, reducing bandwidth congestion and improving employee productivity.

Cisco

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection offers comprehensive DNS security through advanced threat intelligence and API support, making it an ideal choice for organizations needing robust DNS management.

Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection delivers powerful security for DNS infrastructures, safeguarding against spoofing and attacks while ensuring network reliability through a centralized management system. It features high availability grids, automated responses, and integration with existing DNS and DHCP infrastructures. The interface offers management dashboards, reporting, and a GUI that enhances operational control. However, improvements in technical support, documentation, and third-party integrations like Cisco API integration may optimize user experience further.

What are the key features of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection?

Robust DNS Security: Protects against DNS attacks with advanced threat intelligence.
API Integration: Facilitates seamless integration with existing infrastructure.
Grid Interface: Ensures network reliability with high availability and failover capabilities.
Centralized Management: Offers visibility with dashboards and reporting tools.
Automated Responses: Enhances response time with ansible scripts.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Reduces risk of DNS-related threats.
Improved Network Reliability: Ensures continuous operation with grid high availability.
Ease of Management: Unified interface simplifies DNS, DHCP, and IPAM tasks.
Compliance Support: Aligns with standards like ISO 27001 for better compliance.

In sectors such as government and BFSI, Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection integrates with DNS and DHCP servers to reinforce internal and external security frameworks. Organizations use it to enhance cybersecurity strategies, reduce downtime, and meet compliance requirements effectively.

Infoblox

Sample Customers

Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

Arup Group, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, K&L Gates, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Transplace

Colruyt Group, Council Rock School District, Danone, GlaxoSmithKline, The Hershey Company

Buyer's Guide

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Zscaler and others in Secure Web Gateways (SWG). Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

918,970 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.