No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Ubiquiti WLAN comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
3.3
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless reduces costs, enhances connectivity and security, and offers strong community support with durable, signal-improving technology.
Sentiment score
1.8
Ubiquiti WLAN offers competitive pricing and ROI, but its performance varies based on design quality and specific needs.
This singular point is important because one wants something that is not just cost-effective but also something that can be supported and troubleshot with skilled people familiar with the technology.
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
Giving me a view of unauthorized users attempting to access the environment, which I can easily track from the Meraki dashboard, allowing me to reject such traffic as and when needed.
Solution Engineer & Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I find Cisco Meraki MR Wireless to be cost-effective, and it delivers a good return on investment.
Technical wireless Team Lead at SEE "Systems Engineering of Egypt"
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless customer service receives mixed ratings, with regional differences and varying levels of support effectiveness noted.
Sentiment score
4.5
Ubiquiti WLAN's customer service is satisfactory but direct technical assistance is often inadequate, with notable self-service resource effectiveness.
Cisco's technical support is the best.
Technical wireless Team Lead at SEE "Systems Engineering of Egypt"
Raising a tech call can be a convoluted mechanism, which impacts my rating.
Enterprise Architect at Fujitsu
Among our tickets, 50% receive proper support and guidance, while the remaining 50% do not receive adequate attention.
Technical Solution Architect at liwa
The problem with Ubiquiti is the lack of a serious reselling chain, as they sell directly to the customer.
Senior Software and Systems Engineer at SAMU.IT
I seldom contact the technical support team as there is comprehensive documentation and FAQs available that help me resolve most issues independently.
Infrastructure Administrator at Aluko & Oyebode
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.2
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless offers scalable management but may face limitations with advanced features affecting routing tables.
Sentiment score
7.0
Ubiquiti WLAN is scalable and flexible for SMEs, but faces challenges in very large or dense environments.
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is easier to deploy or manage multiple access points via the same Meraki dashboard cloud.
Solution Engineer & Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I have seen a customer scale from three branch offices to approximately ninety-seven, and it scaled without issues.
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is very easy to scale in either direction.
IT Specialist at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It might struggle in very complex environments with many users.
Infrastructure Administrator at Aluko & Oyebode
Scalability is a strong point for Ubiquiti Wireless LAN.
Senior Software and Systems Engineer at SAMU.IT
I would assess the scalability feature of Ubiquiti WLAN in accommodating my organization's growth or changing network demands as pretty scalable, warranting a nine out of ten rating.
IT Architect and Consultant at Compuhouse working for SDC and Bernadotte Skolen
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is praised for strong reliability, high stability, and continuous improvements, despite some concerns about vendor lock-in.
Sentiment score
7.0
Ubiquiti WLAN is generally stable and reliable but can encounter issues with connection drops, updates, and high-density environments.
I have not seen any glitches, bugs, or stability problems with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless.
IT Specialist at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It's stable, but there's a vendor lock-in with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless.
Enterprise Architect at Fujitsu
Proper connections and cabling are essential for maintaining stability.
Infrastructure Administrator at Aluko & Oyebode
It performs well as an access point but is not designed for high-density environments.
Senior Software and Systems Engineer at SAMU.IT
It does require some maintenance from my side, including troubleshooting and fixing occasionally.
IT Architect and Consultant at Compuhouse working for SDC and Bernadotte Skolen
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless faces criticism for high costs, limited features, insufficient support, and challenges with scalability and integration.
Ubiquiti WLAN struggles with manageability, support, and stability, needing enhanced tools, features, and AI for improved performance.
In my opinion, what should be improved in Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is that the AP should initially get configured irrespective of the internet connectivity.
Technical Presales at Vcom Technologies
My main concern is that Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is overpriced, has limited functionality, and the hardware is not prepared for any further improvements in terms of features.
Enterprise Architect at Fujitsu
Cost is also an area for improvement, as feedback from some customers indicates that for the same amount of value received from alternative solutions, Cisco Meraki MR Wireless could be priced better.
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
This could provide a detailed view of connections and possible disconnections, offering valuable insights for improving Wi-Fi connections.
Senior Software and Systems Engineer at SAMU.IT
There is room for improvement in providing the flexibility to change the default management VLAN from VLAN one to another for enhanced security.
Infrastructure Administrator at Aluko & Oyebode
Capacity has been a concern, especially since I needed to change some of my devices to a 10 gig network due to limitations.
Chief Digital Officer (CDO) at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
 

Setup Cost

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, despite high pricing, is valued for quality, reliability, simplicity, and discounts for existing customers.
Ubiquiti WLAN offers cost-effective, one-time pricing without recurring fees, providing competitive value compared to pricier alternatives like Aruba.
The cost of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is high; the price of one AP to the end customer is approximately 50,000 INR.
Technical Presales at Vcom Technologies
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very straightforward with no complex licensing requirements; just one single subscription based license on the APs is what is outstanding, making pricing and licensing pretty easy.
Solution Engineer & Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would rate pricing an eight, as the retail prices are rather high, but if we go as a known customer to Meraki, there are some nice discounts.
IT Specialist at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Ubiquiti is affordable, as it does not require recurring licensing fees.
Infrastructure Administrator at Aluko & Oyebode
it is considered medium-priced, suitable for the quality it offers.
Senior Software and Systems Engineer at SAMU.IT
 

Valuable Features

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless offers cloud-based management, enhanced security, and scalability with AI features for streamlined network operations.
Ubiquiti WLAN offers high security, scalability, user-friendly management, cost-effectiveness, and robust performance with adaptable hybrid environment features.
Regarding security features Air Marshal and WIPS, they help with protecting my network, as we use enterprise protocols, so it meets our standards.
IT Specialist at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Easy deployment and configuration is the biggest feature that I really appreciate about the solution, plus it allows me to implement basic access-based controls, which gives me the feasibility of having secured connectivity.
Solution Engineer & Manager at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Everything can be done remotely, including deployment, provisioning, and troubleshooting from the cloud.
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
The Cloud Key Controller is a valuable feature because it allows me to access the wireless system from the cloud and locally within the same network, enhancing network management.
Infrastructure Administrator at Aluko & Oyebode
I utilize Ubiquiti WLAN unified management system, and it helps streamline network management by making consistent configuration of all my access points and switches.
IT Architect and Consultant at Compuhouse working for SDC and Bernadotte Skolen
It provides one interface to manage all installations, allowing me to monitor all customers through the same web interface.
Senior Software and Systems Engineer at SAMU.IT
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless
Ranking in Wireless LAN
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ubiquiti WLAN
Ranking in Wireless LAN
8th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is 1.6%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ubiquiti WLAN is 4.2%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ubiquiti WLAN4.2%
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless1.6%
Other94.2%
Wireless LAN
 

Featured Reviews

Michel Ned - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds
Cloud-managed wireless has unified multi-floor offices and has improved application visibility
The central provisioning capability is a major strength, combined with the cloud-based nature of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless. Everything can be done remotely, including deployment, provisioning, and troubleshooting from the cloud. The hardware requirement on-premises is significantly reduced, with only access points needed on-site while the controller sits in the cloud. This represents the major selling point. Many enterprise environments now require application steering and the ability to control traffic through their WAN or SD-WAN, ensuring they can tag applications and enforce policies from a Layer 7 perspective. From the wireless perspective, being able to begin that Layer 7 tracking or Layer 7 enforcement all the way down to the core and to the WAN is valuable. The ability to see through packets at Layer 7 is a good advantage for enterprises that are very security-focused and optimization-focused, making application steering a very important feature. Cloud provisioning is beneficial not only for initial setup but also for troubleshooting and issue resolution. The advantage is that one does not have to deal with the issues of on-premises accessibility, and network issues can be isolated from the cloud. Since Cisco Meraki MR Wireless controller itself is in the cloud, it makes operations easier. The visibility on-premises combined with the ability to control and troubleshoot multiple locations and branch offices from a single pane of glass is very useful. Visibility into the type of traffic passing through at a given point in time is important. If that information can be passed through a SIEM or integrated with a security operations center or incident and event management tool within Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, it provides deeper visibility. The fact that Cisco Meraki MR Wireless can log traffic data for analysis is a very good and frequently used feature.
Isaiah Etuk - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Digital Officer (CDO) at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Segmentation and remote management have optimized secure hybrid networks and support flexible customization
I find that the most valuable aspect of Ubiquiti WLAN is its ease of segmentation and management, allowing me to tag interfaces without needing to spin up an interface.My feedback on the Unifi management system is that it has made managing my devices and ecosystem easy, allowing me to manage remotely and physically while maintaining a new layer of security for device policies.I would say I am fine with the security features from Ubiquiti WLAN; I have not had any issues managing devices or applying different layers of security.Mesh networking is one of the best for me; especially with my isolated Wi-Fi network, it is managed easily using Ubiquiti.I mostly work with on-prem deployment, but I have a transparent outlay into my network on the cloud for remote insight without using cloud storage on my devices.My deployment for cloud is essentially a virtual private cloud for storage, and I am considering an integration to store videos on Ubiquiti devices, moving them from on-prem to the cloud.I am totally satisfied with the functionality of Ubiquiti WLAN for my clients; it does exactly what I need.For pricing, I rate Ubiquiti WLAN as cheap when compared to others.Ubiquiti WLAN is the only one that provides unlimited capabilities for customization, which I greatly appreciate compared to Cisco options.I have not requested technical support from Ubiquiti before because I usually solve issues on my own if they arise.I rate this product a nine out of ten overall.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very straightforward with no complex licensing requirements; just one single subscription based license on the APs is what is outstanding, ...
What needs improvement with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?
I cannot think of any at the moment because the only possible solution we are right now using is HP Aruba, the other competition, and in my opinion, both solutions offer a similar feature set; it i...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?
My primary use case for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is to provide wireless LAN access for campus network solutions, and my current customers are primarily from the ATI industry, specifically airports ...
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
Which is better - Ubiquiti WLAN or Aruba Instant?
We researched Ubiquiti and Aruba when looking for a WLAN solution. Ubiquiti offers good WLAN access both indoors and outdoors. It provides an enterprise-level WIFI while remaining cost-effective. U...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ubiquiti WLAN?
My experience with overall licensing costs, setup costs, and pricing of the product is that it's reasonable.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
NASCAR Grand-AM, Maritime Parc, Outdoor Music Festival, One Republic Tour, British Armed Forces, Arcadia School District, Bartlett School District, Universidad del Azuay, Estelar Hotels, Intercontinental Bali, Moscow - Enforta, Miami - Sling Broadband, Manhattan - MST, Ecuador - Aire.EC
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs. Ubiquiti WLAN and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.