We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and NowSecure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST)."One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."
"The features and technologies are very good. The flexibility and the roadmap have also been very good. They're at the forefront of delivering the additional capabilities that are required with cloud delivery, etc. Their ability to deliver what customers require and when they require is very important."
"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."
"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."
"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."
"The UI is user-friendly."
"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."
"The most valuable feature for me is the Jenkins Plugin."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to download an application without actually putting in the APK. It gives us an option to put the APK in if we want to but we can download it from the App Store and Play Store."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."
"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."
"The plugins for the development environment have room for improvements such as for Android Studio and X code."
"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."
"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."
"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."
"In this solution, there are two kinds of testing, static analysis, and dynamic analysis. There needs some improvement in testing with dynamic analysis because I have found it is not accurate"
Earn 20 points
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Testing (AST) with 67 reviews while NowSecure is ranked 32nd in Application Security Testing (AST). Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while NowSecure is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NowSecure writes "Scalable and reliable, but dynamic analysis needs improvement". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas NowSecure is most compared with Veracode, Data Theorem API Secure , GitLab and Acunetix.
See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.