Checkmarx One vs Cybersixgill comparison

Checkmarx and Cybersixgill are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Checkmarx is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.3, while Cybersixgill is ranked #67. Checkmarx holds a 1.2% mindshare in VM, compared to Cybersixgill’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cybersixgill users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Checkmarx One and Cybersixgill are security solutions competing in the digital protection category. Checkmarx One seems to have the upper hand in affordability and support, while Cybersixgill offers superior threat intelligence features, appealing to businesses prioritizing comprehensive threat insights.

Features: Checkmarx One offers comprehensive security testing capabilities, static application security testing, and open-source software analysis. Cybersixgill provides advanced threat intelligence, deep dark web monitoring, and real-time alerting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could improve on offering more advanced threat intelligence features, enhance its integration with third-party tools, and develop more detailed real-time monitoring. Cybersixgill might need to offer more affordable options, improve user interface clarity, and expand deployment options for varied business sizes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One supports both cloud and on-premise deployments, ensuring flexibility, and offers efficient customer service. Cybersixgill focuses on cloud-based deployment with seamless integration into existing security ecosystems, with customer service tailored to enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is considered cost-effective, offering good value over time. Cybersixgill, with a higher initial setup cost, aims for significant ROI through enhanced threat insights, making it appealing for businesses looking for deep security insights despite the higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Cybersixgill Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Cybersixgill

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cybersixgill is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zafran Security	1.0%
Checkmarx One	1.2%
Cybersixgill	0.3%
Other	97.5%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

reviewer1528356

Lead Cyber Threat-Intelligence Analyst at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees

Provides early detection of imminent attacks, and speeds up addressing of vulnerabilities internally because it makes them real

They're a newer company, so they're working on their UI a lot. Sometimes the UI is a little glitchy. They're working on different things and making efforts, so that's totally forgivable. But regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries. Step-by-step videos would be useful, instead of a book of instructions, because they're a new tool. They're now getting to the point where video training would be useful, or even live training. More digestible video instructions or opportunities for training, so that you actually learn hands-on, would help.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."

"Checkmarx offers many valuable features, including Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Infrastructure as Code (IAC), Supply Chain Security, and API Security."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."

"I have seen a return on investment from Checkmarx One."

"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."

"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."

More Checkmarx One pros

"To be diligent for the customer, we usually go into Cybersixgill Investigative Portal to analyze and search things. The solution tells us the reputation of cyber threat actors. So, if someone has a reputation of one, it is a really bad idea to care about what that person is saying. However, if you find someone with a reputation of nine, then there is a high probability that we need to address the problem. You can get information about these type of actors in Cybersixgill Investigative Portal. They have a huge collection, which is like having the rules/goals of the dark web and deep web without having to go there. Our analysts avoid going dark web because they have Cybersixgill Investigative Portal and can get the news from their browser, searching wherever they want."

"They also provide some of the greatest notification capabilities. I put in a customer's company name and domain names, or sometimes I put in their IP addresses as a keyword. Once Sixgill collects information that includes those keywords, they then provide us email notifications. That means we can catch information related to our customers as soon as possible."

"The solution’s approach of using limited open source intelligence and focusing, instead, on the Deep Web and Dark Web is what seals the deal. That is why I like them. I have other tools that I can aggregate all the open source intelligence from. I value Cybersixgill because it provides access to things that no one else does."

"The advanced analysis has made our security operations more efficient. It has also potentially given us quicker access to data that we might not have otherwise located."

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."

"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."

"Some were valid and some were not applicable for us based on the scenario."

"I would like the product to include more debugging and developed tools. It needs to also add enhancements on the coding side."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Sixgill has strong capabilities based on search queries, but there is some difficulty in using Sixgill. Their querying is very powerful but it can be difficult. It's not hugely complex but you need some skill to use Sixgill querying."

"The breadth of access to data is good, but there are gaps. More data would be my suggestion because the platform is good and I have no complaints about the system. I think it is just a case of always trying to get more data sources."

"We need real-time updated information. If we could have this, it would be amazing. For example, if someone was posting something, then ten second later, it was on the platform. Sometimes, it takes a minute or hours right now, depending on the forum."

"Regarding their scraping abilities, things could be solidified. There are definitely improvements that could be made on the specificity for setting certain queries."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"The solution is costly."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is cheap compared with Recorded Future. Sixgill's cost-effectiveness is very good."

"The pricing and licensing are good. It is expensive for us because the US dollar is quite strong compared to our dollar. Otherwise, it is quite reasonable for what it is. All the tools in the market are around the same price from my experience."

"Sometimes, Cybersixgill Investigative Portal is cheaper than its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	38

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 34% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 14% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 44% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Recorded Future vs Cybersixgill

Compared 68% of the time

CyberInt Argos vs Cybersixgill

Compared 13% of the time

Digital Shadows vs Cybersixgill

Compared 10% of the time

Flashpoint Intelligence Platform vs Cybersixgill

Compared 9% of the time

More Cybersixgill Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

September 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

October 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Cybersixgill

October 2025

Download Cybersixgill product report

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Cybersixgill empowers organizations with cyber intelligence by monitoring open sources and dark web activities, tracking threat exposure, and assessing risks without on-premises infrastructure.

Cybersixgill enables powerful intelligence gathering by providing access to a comprehensive data lake of deep and dark web activity, identifying trends in malware, and analyzing underground markets. Organizations can monitor illegal activities like credit card sales and conduct searches on hacker forums using its API and Investigative Portal. Automatic translations and alerts enhance threat detection, making it a vital tool for real-time cybersecurity management. Users have expressed a desire for better real-time updates and improved data source coverage along with more user-friendly query specificity and training materials.

What are the key features of Cybersixgill?

Investigative Portal: Empowers teams with contextual, actionable alerts and covert investigation capabilities.
Data Lake: Leverages the largest collection of deep and dark web activity for comprehensive threat analysis.
Advanced Search: Utilizes operators for specific queries and tracking leaked credentials efficiently.
Real-time Alerts: Provides instant notifications customized to organizational needs.
Threat Actor Profiling: Examines profiles, methods, and histories to understand risks comprehensively.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Time Savings: Streamlined information gathering reduces the need for multiple analysts.
Risk Mitigation: Identifying threats early lowers potential impacts and enhances security posture.
Enhanced Coverage: Broad access to deep and dark web data enriches intelligence capabilities.
Return on Investment: Effective threat detection and response minimize potential losses.

Cybersixgill's cybersecurity solutions are critical in sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail where sensitive data protection is paramount. Organizations leverage the platform to proactively detect threats and safeguard customer information, significantly reducing the risk of data breaches and fraud while maintaining industry compliance.

Cybersixgill

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Current customers include large enterprises, financial services, manufacturing, GSIs, MSSPs, government and law enforcement entities.

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Cybersixgill

September 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Cybersixgill

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Cybersixgill and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Cybersixgill report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.