We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Netskope based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Compliance is becoming an important tool for us as well."
"The administration portal panel is very intuitive."
"The most valuable feature is the CloudBots for auto-remediation of security findings."
"Good interface and visibility."
"We can monitor each activity from our mobile devices, so there is complete visibility of our cloud traffic flows, with threat intelligence provided by Check Point."
"People implementing this solution are concerned with addressing a significant risk, and within the AWS realm, this tool does de-risk substantially."
"All of the features are very useful in today's market."
"Dome9 continues to be a major piece of our cloud security architecture and has given our senior leadership team a high degree of confidence in our ability to protect our cloud environment."
"The detection capability is very nice and lightweight."
"It's one of the top-ranking solutions in the market, and it's very responsive. We are using Netskope, and Netskope provides a load of features for SQL, STP, and traffic control."
"Its deployment is very easy and quick. Their technical support is also very good."
"The solution offers a better understanding of the real scenario and identifies the cloud apps that are being utilized."
"The most useful feature of this solution is Cloud Control, which allows me to schedule cloud uploads."
"The most valuable features were related to discovery, data protection, and ensuring compliance with regulations."
"Netskope is an efficient, reliable, and easy-to-manage solution."
"A feature that was valuable was the built-in website classification or safety ratings. Different websites would be rated according to analyses that the Netskope team had done, and we built policies on some of those scores. If the website scored less than a certain percentage, then we would have a different user experience around how the site would interact with the clients."
"The false positives can be annoying at times."
"We were demotivated by the lack of native automation modules for the Terraform and Ansible tools."
"The reporting has a lot of opportunities to continuously improve so that we can continue to show value."
"Streamlining the user interface would greatly improve the user experience."
"It does not support on-premise deployments such as VMware Tanzu, and this has been a major drawback when it comes to integrations with some applications."
"Reporting should have more options."
"The tool should incorporate more use cases like improving security scores. It should also improve documentation."
"It should have some options to activate API calls to the platform in the cloud, another improvement would be that when the rules are colonized and they want to be published."
"The solution's documentation still needs to be improved."
"The configuration in the cloud model could be improved upon."
"Netskope CASB can improve by working more similarly to a VPN technology instead of a proxy. They then could have visibility on the endpoint device. Most clients have some tools where they check the endpoint health or other things, such as the security posture, or if they want to access the resources. For example, if they should have antivirus running, this kind of posture check should be available but it is missing."
"Support services could definitely be improved. Support is the one area that can always use improvement. It's an evolving thing, so based on demand and based on market requirement and the way market is moving towards."
"The solution's implementations can be made much easier because, currently, it is complex in nature."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There could be room for improvement in the subscription process."
"It needed some fine-tuning on core business sites that we used, which were sensitive to what we term a man-in-the-middle certificate by design. Some sites were not tolerant because they presented as potentially malicious. So, we just had to make some tweaks so that it would bypass or interpret it."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 60 reviews while Netskope is ranked 4th in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) with 35 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Netskope is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope writes "Network proxy that provides visibility during deployment and allows you to control PII". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Netskope is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Cisco Umbrella and Skyhigh Security.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
