No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs QuillBot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
2nd
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (6th), Large Language Models (LLMs) (2nd)
QuillBot
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
5th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the AI Writing Tools category, the mindshare of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is 6.2%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuillBot is 6.2%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Writing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise6.2%
QuillBot6.2%
Other87.6%
AI Writing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Neha Chhangani - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
Collaborative workspace has transformed our content creation and daily team productivity
There is scope for improvement in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise regarding more customization of team behavior. Teams often want even finer control over how the assistant responds, including industry-specific tones, branding voice, or response constraints that apply only to certain teams within the organization. While the shared workspace is powerful, deeper integration with internal enterprise systems could enhance accuracy and relevance. Current team history features are useful, but some teams want more granular control over what is shared or archived, especially when dealing with sensitive topics. More flexible memory settings at the project or chat level and better usage analytics would be beneficial. Admins often want richer insights into how the team is using the platform, not just overall usage but impact metrics tied to business outcomes. Real-time collaboration is great, but there is room to grow in how teams co-author and annotate AI outputs together. Additional improvements would include domain-specific models. Some teams operate in highly specialized domains and want models tuned to their field. The option to load domain-specific language packs or fine-tuned models within the enterprise environment would be valuable. Teams sometimes want clearer insight into why the assistant responded a certain way, especially on complex queries, so adding an explain-why feature with brief reasoning steps or confidence indicators for responses would improve understanding. For ultra-sensitive deployments, some organizations prefer tools that can run without cloud dependency, so having a secure on-premise or private cloud deployment option with the same collaboration compatibilities would be beneficial. Further improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise include the AI better understanding inter-team context. This would involve recognizing when a query relates to a previous project or department-specific knowledge to reduce repeated explanations or clarifications. While it handles many languages, more robust enterprise-grade multilingual capabilities, including idiomatic expressions and regional business terminologies, would help global teams collaborate more effectively. Allowing the AI to tailor responses based on the user's role makes output more precise and immediately actionable. For highly sensitive projects, having a secure offline mode or on-premises deployment would increase adoption in regulated industries.
MW
Cst Csd at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Writing clarity has improved and I polish reports and emails faster under time pressure
QuillBot is really helpful overall, but there are a few things that can be a bit frustrating. Sometimes the paraphrasing can feel too robotic or slightly off in tone, so I have to go back and tweak it to make it sound more my own. It does not always fully capture the exact meaning or context, especially with more complex sentences. Another thing is that stronger paraphrasing modes can change the sentence too much, which is not always what I want. I usually have to adjust the synonym level to keep it balanced. Also, for longer pieces of writing, it can feel a bit chunky since I have to do it paragraph by paragraph instead of refining everything smoothly at once. It is a great tool, but I still see it as more of a helper rather than something I can rely on completely without editing.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"From a cost-effective standpoint, the most immediate return on investment comes from saving time across high-value tasks, resulting in approximately a 40 to 60 percent reduction in manual effort and turnaround time, when translated into costs."
"The context-aware responses provide significant value in my company communication strategies."
"ChatGPT has positively impacted our organization by speeding up a lot of our processing time."
"Because of the integration of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, the number of errors which we are getting are reduced, error resolution has also improved a lot due to the correct point of contact pointing out from ChatGPT Team - Enterprise of the source of the error, due to which our project efficiency has improved."
"One main thing is the amount of time we have saved since we started using ChatGPT Team - Enterprise in our project, as for every task we can get it done within minutes, whether it is a technical task, documentation, or sending out an email, saving almost four to five hours a day for us since we integrated ChatGPT Team - Enterprise into our project."
"From a business perspective, the ROI justifies the cost because of the time saved in troubleshooting, documentation, and automation."
"It provides details that previously took days or weeks to gather, and I can improve and get more insight on subjects with more accuracy."
"I save significant time because I can quickly get information about sources for subjects and main industry specialists regarding specific themes."
"QuillBot is highly relevant in today's environment as it improves communication quality, enhances writing clarity, and helps professionals create accurate and polished content efficiently."
"QuillBot has had a pretty positive impact on both my work and studies currently, mainly by saving time and helping me feel more confident in my writing."
 

Cons

"Citation accuracy and source attribution is also an area that could be enhanced in literature review and academic writing."
"Sometimes when we give any complex technical scenarios, ChatGPT Team - Enterprise may not be fully accurate."
"I feel that the licensing and setup cost for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is somewhat high because its competitors provide similar features at a lower price."
"I would not recommend ChatGPT as a standalone product. I think it could be beneficial when used alongside other tools, but as a standalone solution, its accuracy cannot be entirely trusted."
"If we want to generate some complex queries which are using multiple databases or multiple tables, it may sometimes not return the final query correctly."
"The information base of ChatGPT has to grow because, in some cases, it does not include information about my city."
"The pricing is on the heavier side for the Nigerian market."
"These evaluations aren't always accurate because if you're not a specialist on the subject, you may create something that's not real."
"Sometimes the paraphrasing can feel too robotic or slightly off in tone, so I have to go back and tweak it to make it sound more my own."
"Overdependence can reduce writing skills, and sometimes the meaning may slightly change, so a manual check is needed before sending emails."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Writing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
University
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
24%
Outsourcing Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ChatGPT?
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is already a powerful language model tool, but I think there could be a few areas of improvement. One key area is greater transparency and control over model reasoning. Al...
What is your primary use case for ChatGPT?
I have been using ChatGPT Team - Enterprise for the last three years. My main use of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise as a professor centers on research documentation, advanced data analytics, and code ge...
What advice do you have for others considering ChatGPT?
As an experienced person with more than 15 years in the field, my advice to others looking into using ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is to start with clearly defined use cases first. Organizations that ...
What needs improvement with QuillBot?
QuillBot is a highly effective writing tool. However, it can be improved by enhancing contextual accuracy, reducing dependency on manual review, and expanding features in the free version.
What is your primary use case for QuillBot?
I typically use QuillBot for grammar checking and fixing grammar and spelling mistakes, which is useful for professional emails. Whenever I write mail, QuillBot transforms the text into professiona...
What advice do you have for others considering QuillBot?
QuillBot should be used as a support tool to enhance writing quality efficiently, but users should always review the output to ensure accuracy and context. QuillBot is highly relevant in today's en...
 

Also Known As

Rockset
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs. QuillBot and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.