We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cassandra Logo
2,582 views|2,099 comparisons
Couchbase Logo
1,756 views|1,113 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cassandra vs. Couchbase and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing.""Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover.""The technical evaluation is very good.""The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level.""The solution's database capabilities are very good."

More Cassandra Pros →

"The valuable features of Couchbase are the many documents and index types, and they made a lot of features available enabling us to use it as a complete solution for our needs.""I have found the views to be very valuable.""The most valuable features are the ease of application and the merging of data."

More Couchbase Pros →

Cons
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge.""The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that.""The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions.""Interface is not user friendly.""The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."

More Cassandra Cons →

"I have tried multiple libraries in a demo they provide and it works fine, but when it merges with libraries, it creates a problem.""It is very difficult to load the backup of the older version to the newer version.""There are some limitations to the database. The SQL database cannot handle real-time processing for critical IoT scenarios. What we have to do is store our data into the database then code it out, this wastes a lot of time."

More Couchbase Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."
  • More Couchbase Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover.
    Top Answer: 
    The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions.
    Top Answer: 
    We are using this solution for IoT projects where there is a need for high-performance runtime databases.
    Top Answer: 
    The valuable features of Couchbase are the many documents and index types, and they made a lot of features available enabling us to use it as a complete solution for our needs.
    Top Answer: 
    There are some limitations to the database. The SQL database cannot handle real-time processing for critical IoT scenarios. What we have to do is store our data into the database then code it out… more »
    Top Answer: 
    In our current project, we use this solution in the healthcare field for the telemedical industry and in other projects in the automation industry.
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    2,582
    Comparisons
    2,099
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    430
    Rating
    8.4
    5th
    out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    1,756
    Comparisons
    1,113
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    447
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    A scalable multi-master database with no single points of failure. Scalability & high availability without compromising performance.

    Couchbase Server is a NoSQL database, which has become the de facto standard for building Systems of Engagement. It is designed with a distributed architecture for performance, scalability, and availability. It enables developers to build applications easier and faster by leveraging the power of SQL with the flexibility of JSON.

    The new string, date, array, and JSON object functions that have been added to N1QL simplify data transformations and provide richer query expressions.

    Faster queries in N1QL are the result of several query engine performance enhancements across many types of operations, including joins and index scans.

    The most innovative enterprises are introducing NoSQL to replace or augment legacy databases, including Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server. With Couchbase Server, they get the best of both worlds – the powerful querying and enterprise features of a relational database, combined with the scalability, performance, and flexibility of a NoSQL database.

    To make the transition easier, Couchbase Server provides many of the same features found in relational databases.



    Offer
    Learn more about Cassandra
    Learn more about Couchbase
    Sample Customers
    Apple, BazaarVoice, Best Buy, eBay, Netflix
    LinkedIn, Marriott, PayPal
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider26%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Retailer10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cassandra vs. Couchbase and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cassandra is ranked 3rd in NoSQL Databases with 5 reviews while Couchbase is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.4, while Couchbase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Great time series data feature but it requires third parties to join tables". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Couchbase writes "Good interface, dashboard, and analytics, and I have never needed anything else with it". Cassandra is most compared with InfluxDB, Accumulo, Vertica, Apache HBase and Oracle NoSQL, whereas Couchbase is most compared with MongoDB, Apache HBase, Scylla, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and CouchDB. See our Cassandra vs. Couchbase report.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.