Carbonite Server vs Oracle Data Guard comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #57, while Oracle is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in BRS, compared to Oracle’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

3,973 Views
2,702 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Data Guard

Read 32 Oracle Data Guard reviews

3,383 Views
3,315 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Oracle Data Guard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Oracle Data Guard and Carbonite Server compete in the data protection and disaster recovery category. Oracle Data Guard has the upper hand due to its robust features and better ROI, while Carbonite Server stands out for ease of deployment and customer service.

Features: Oracle Data Guard offers high availability, disaster recovery, and data protection, which integrates well with Oracle environments. Carbonite Server features ease of use, cross-platform support, and automatic backups. Users find Oracle Data Guard's advanced data replication effective and note Carbonite Server's user-friendliness and versatility.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Data Guard needs simplification of setup and enhanced reporting tools. Carbonite Server needs better large-scale data transfer speeds and more comprehensive recovery options. Oracle's complexity and Carbonite's performance challenges are notable areas for development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Data Guard's setup is complex and time-consuming, unlike Carbonite Server which is straightforward. Oracle Data Guard's customer service is less responsive compared to Carbonite's highly rated support, giving Carbonite an edge in user-friendliness and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Data Guard has higher setup costs but offers good ROI due to reliability and integration. Carbonite Server has lower initial costs and provides a balance of cost and functionality, although ROI might be lower in large-scale deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (44th)

Oracle Data Guard

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

37th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Data Guard is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Data Guard	0.8%
Carbonite Server	0.9%
Other	98.3%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

AdnanNaseem

Principal DB A at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Active data protection has ensured high availability and supports seamless reporting workloads

In my opinion, Active Data Guard is the most valuable feature. We use the secondary side for reporting purposes, which reduces the load on the primary side. Oracle Data Guard includes functions such as automatic failover, but we use manual managed failover. After some months, we converted our primary to secondary and secondary to primary. Oracle Data Guard is effective in minimizing data loss and provides a good solution for that. The main benefits of Oracle Data Guard include minimizing data loss during a production failure. It is used for maximum availability when paired with Oracle RAC, so if any disruption occurs, we have an alternative Data Guard to convert our load to the disaster recovery site. Oracle Data Guard maintains a high level of data integrity by using archive logs. When a transaction happens, redo logs create archive logs, which are then applied on the disaster recovery side, ensuring that both databases are synchronized.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is very stable."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

More Carbonite Server pros

"The most valuable feature is the application or promotional code used in the production protocol to transfer data to the secondary database, situated on the DR site."

"We like Oracle because the solution is very robust, it's also efficient for queries and is easy to scale."

"The solution can scale as needed."

"Oracle Data Guard is a free solution. When you apply for Enterprise Manager, it comes for free with the solution."

"The solution is quite stable, as we haven't experienced any bugs, glitches, or crashes, and we find it to be quite reliable."

"I would recommend that every implementation that goes to the production environment must be done together with Oracle Data Guard."

"The solution is really very stable; one good thing about it, compared to other products, is that you can just run it and forget about it, and unless you come across some interruptions in the network, it works like a charm."

"If you have a problem with your primary site and can't access your primary database, you can continue working with the database that you have as standby on the other site, by changing its role to primary."

More Oracle Data Guard pros

Cons

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"I would like to see an improvement on the management user interface, as well as Kellion integrations."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

More Carbonite Server cons

"The deployment cost is expensive."

"The implementation is complex for anyone who's jumping into it without any experience. It's all command-line driven implementations. For some, that's a turn-off."

"The database administration needs improvement. With Oracle, we have a lot of features for administrating data, but it might be too many. It needs to be simplified. It should be automated. Looking at Enterprise Manager, there are too many KPIs in place."

"The usage of block storage devices in the cloud or migration of a type of storage from one site to another site can be improved. Currently, we have to use multi-node to single node because of the lack of storage support on the Azure side. It did not really work. Our DBA had to spend a lot of time tweaking the Data Guard tools, or the underlying Oracle VMs, to make sure that Data Guard would run on top of different types of storage. So, if it can support transporting or getting from one type of storage to another type of storage in a different site or a different technology, it would be very helpful."

"A significant improvement for Oracle Data Guard would be enabling the disaster recovery site to handle read and write operations, not just data storage."

"Sometimes, the technical support team takes time to respond."

"Oracle could be improved by the ability to manage it on the cloud. This on-premises version is secure and reliable, but I'm sure that they will soon provide a cloud solution that will be even better. In one to two years, we will probably move to the cloud—we have already moved to the cloud with Microsoft Exchange, but our databases are still on-premises. I would prefer managing a cloud version of Oracle."

"The initial setup is complex."

More Oracle Data Guard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The solution is open source."

"Its price is reasonable."

"The licensing cost is significantly high."

"It's a cost-effective solution."

"This is the best solution if you want something similar that's less expensive than Oracle Grid."

"The cost of the Oracle license will depend on the negotiations with Oracle."

"The cost is expensive."

"Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost."

"If you want to have everything automated and done smoothly, you have to add additional licenses."

"It is not a cheap product, but if you look at the price, features, availability, scalability, and maturity, it is a very good product."

More Oracle Data Guard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

It is a very useful administrative IT tool. It saves on costs. I strongly recommend Data Guard. I've been using it for eight years and I would strongly recommend it. I'd rate Oracle Data Guard a se...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

We're Oracle partners. We've worked with databases 11G and 12C. If a company is planning to implement Oracle solutions, I would suggest they also implement Data Guard. I'd rate the solution nine ou...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 7% of the time

Dell NetWorker vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp SnapCenter vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Data Guard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

July 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Guard

July 2026

Download Oracle Data Guard product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

Active Data Guard

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

Oracle Data Guard offers robust disaster recovery and high availability solutions for enterprises by providing data protection and efficient failover capabilities. It ensures seamless data continuity across instances with primary and standby databases working in tandem.

Oracle Data Guard increases data availability through features like switchover, failover, and real-time replication. Its robust backup and restore functionalities safeguard data during disasters. Active Data Guard supports read-only reporting on standby sites, while automating block repair and maintaining data integrity with archived logs. Despite its strengths, Oracle Data Guard requires enhancements in licensing costs and user-friendliness. Users encounter challenges in complex setup and maintenance, demanding improved monitoring, automation, and flexible replication. Enhancing the graphical interface, technical support, and integration with third-party systems is recommended for seamless operation.

What are Oracle Data Guard's most important features?

Switchover and Failover: Swift transition between primary and standby databases reduces downtime.
Active Data Guard: Enables reporting capabilities on standby databases without affecting production.
Real-time Replication: Ensures data consistency across all databases.
Automated Block Repair: Enhances data integrity through automated processes.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Downtime: Failover capabilities ensure business continuity by minimizing downtime.
Data Protection: Secure backup and restore functions safeguard data during failures.
Scalability: Suitable for enterprise deployment, accommodating growth and complexity.
Operational Efficiency: Real-time data replication enables uninterrupted business operations.

Enterprises use Oracle Data Guard extensively for maintaining high availability and disaster recovery. By leveraging primary and standby databases, organizations ensure data continuity across various locations. This setup allows running reports and queries on standby databases during disruptions, ensuring that business operations remain unaffected during unexpected catastrophic events.

Oracle

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Athenahealth, Discover Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard

August 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.