Carbonite Server vs Oracle Data Guard comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #57, while Oracle is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.3. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in BRS, compared to Oracle’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

1,779 Views
1,263 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Data Guard

Read 31 Oracle Data Guard reviews

1,857 Views
1,801 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Oracle Data Guard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Oracle Data Guard and Carbonite Server compete in the data protection and disaster recovery category. Oracle Data Guard has the upper hand due to its robust features and better ROI, while Carbonite Server stands out for ease of deployment and customer service.

Features: Oracle Data Guard offers high availability, disaster recovery, and data protection, which integrates well with Oracle environments. Carbonite Server features ease of use, cross-platform support, and automatic backups. Users find Oracle Data Guard's advanced data replication effective and note Carbonite Server's user-friendliness and versatility.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Data Guard needs simplification of setup and enhanced reporting tools. Carbonite Server needs better large-scale data transfer speeds and more comprehensive recovery options. Oracle's complexity and Carbonite's performance challenges are notable areas for development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Data Guard's setup is complex and time-consuming, unlike Carbonite Server which is straightforward. Oracle Data Guard's customer service is less responsive compared to Carbonite's highly rated support, giving Carbonite an edge in user-friendliness and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Data Guard has higher setup costs but offers good ROI due to reliability and integration. Carbonite Server has lower initial costs and provides a balance of cost and functionality, although ROI might be lower in large-scale deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,844 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

57th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (46th)

Oracle Data Guard

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Data Guard is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle Data Guard	0.9%
Carbonite Server	0.8%
Other	98.3%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

AbdulHameed

Assistant Vice President at ZTBL

Ensures high availability, disaster recovery, and data protection for Oracle databases through features like real-time data synchronization, automatic failover and zero data loss

Oracle Data Guard stands out by providing heavy-duty features that enable connecting multiple standby databases to a single production database. Oracle supports up to eight standby databases, offering a level of redundancy and scalability that other platforms cannot match. Implementing Oracle Data Guard ensures the protection and integrity of your data, even in the event of a disaster. With Data Guard, Oracle guarantees zero data loss, providing peace of mind for organizations relying on their data for critical operations. Data Guard offers multiple protection modes, each serving different needs. One such mode is active-active, where both the production and standby databases are actively accessible. In the event of a failure, seamless switchover occurs without disrupting client sessions, as they remain unaware of the transition between databases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is very stable."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

More Carbonite Server pros

"Oracle Data Guard is a free solution. When you apply for Enterprise Manager, it comes for free with the solution."

"The solution is quite stable. We haven't experienced any bugs, glitches, or crashes. We find it to be quite reliable."

"We have found the replication feature the most useful. We use this feature the most. The ability to recover a database with less effort and the use of Oracle Data Guard Broker to administer the complete environment are also very useful features."

"Backup and application continuity are most valuable."

"One of the most valuable features is real-time replication. The version we're using is reliable and easy to deploy."

"You can see how the logs are applied, check the apply time, and how far behind the standby is at any given time."

"It is a top-notch product, super stable, making it our go-to for internal operations."

"Technical support is very good. If at any time we write a ticket, we get the appropriate answer on time."

More Oracle Data Guard pros

Cons

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"One thing that can be improved is the GUI. It would be good to have a very nice GUI to easily configure and administer, providing different presentations to the database administrator. The feature that can be included is the integration with third-party monitoring systems, that is, monitoring systems from other vendors, not only from Oracle."

"They may need to include the monitoring and the alerting part in Data Guard."

"Oracle could be improved by the ability to manage it on the cloud. This on-premises version is secure and reliable, but I'm sure that they will soon provide a cloud solution that will be even better. In one to two years, we will probably move to the cloud—we have already moved to the cloud with Microsoft Exchange, but our databases are still on-premises. I would prefer managing a cloud version of Oracle."

"The product could improve its pricing."

"The predominant issue lies in the communication link between the secondary and primary databases."

"For every standby server you have, you must pay a licensing fee, which is the main disadvantage."

"The usage of block storage devices in the cloud or migration of a type of storage from one site to another site can be improved. Currently, we have to use multi-node to single node because of the lack of storage support on the Azure side. It did not really work. Our DBA had to spend a lot of time tweaking the Data Guard tools, or the underlying Oracle VMs, to make sure that Data Guard would run on top of different types of storage. So, if it can support transporting or getting from one type of storage to another type of storage in a different site or a different technology, it would be very helpful."

"The only difficult part is the cost factor, licensing. Another area of improvement is support."

More Oracle Data Guard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"Its price is reasonable."

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost."

"The cost is expensive."

"The cost of the Oracle license will depend on the negotiations with Oracle."

"It is not a cheap product, but if you look at the price, features, availability, scalability, and maturity, it is a very good product."

"It's a cost-effective solution."

"The pricing is on the higher side."

"This is the best solution if you want something similar that's less expensive than Oracle Grid."

"The licensing cost is significantly high."

More Oracle Data Guard pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

It is a very useful administrative IT tool. It saves on costs. I strongly recommend Data Guard. I've been using it for eight years and I would strongly recommend it. I'd rate Oracle Data Guard a se...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

We're Oracle partners. We've worked with databases 11G and 12C. If a company is planning to implement Oracle solutions, I would suggest they also implement Data Guard. I'd rate the solution nine ou...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 8% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 9% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas NetBackup Appliance vs Oracle Data Guard

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Data Guard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

January 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Guard

January 2026

Download Oracle Data Guard product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

Active Data Guard

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

Oracle Data Guard ensures high availability, data protection, and disaster recovery for enterprise data. Data Guard provides a comprehensive set of services that create, maintain, manage, and monitor one or more standby databases to enable production Oracle databases to survive disasters and data corruptions. Data Guard can be used with traditional backup, restoration, and cluster techniques to provide a high level of data protection and data availability.

Oracle

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Athenahealth, Discover Financial Services

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard

December 2025

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. Oracle Data Guard report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.