We performed a comparison between Camunda Platform and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"It is easy and cheap."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"Documentation can be improved."
"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."
"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."
"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."
"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."
Camunda Platform is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 33 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 25th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Camunda Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda Platform writes "Highly valuable for orchestrating complex business processes, solving many problems, and making the business side understand what we are talking about". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Business processor management system effective for handling internal company orders and intellectual property management". Camunda Platform is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Bizagi, Bonita and Visio, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with IBM BPM, Apache Airflow, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Amazon Step Functions. See our Camunda Platform vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
