We performed a comparison between Camunda and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."
"Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations."
"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."
"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."
"The product must reduce its cost."
"Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."
"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 68 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and ADONIS, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow and ARIS BPA. See our Camunda vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
