CA Unified Communications Monitor vs TruView comparison

Broadcom and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #101, while NETSCOUT is ranked #72 with an average rating of 5.0. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

379 Views
250 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

437 Views
393 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and TruView are competitors in network monitoring and performance evaluation. TruView holds the advantage in features and functionality, offering better value despite CA's favorable pricing and support.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor focuses on overseeing real-time network performance, providing comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, and offering an accessible pricing structure. TruView delivers advanced visibility tools, detailed application analytics, and a robust reporting interface. It integrates multiple data streams, establishing itself as a comprehensive solution.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its visibility tools, improve application analytics, and enrich its reporting interface. TruView might work on simplifying its deployment process, offer more competitive pricing, and improve its entry-level accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor facilitates a straightforward deployment process with dependable assistance, reducing setup complexity. TruView requires a more intricate installation but compensates with excellent customer support and comprehensive guidance that aids in overcoming potential challenges.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a more accessible entry point with cost-effective setup options, presenting an attractive ROI due to its competitive pricing. TruView, while having a higher initial cost, provides advantages in long-term ROI through its robust features and comprehensive analytics capabilities, focusing on long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. TruView Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. TruView

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,576 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

101st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (68th)

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

72nd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TruView?

We use TruView to monitor traffic, analyze flows, track packets, and measure bandwidth across our network. This helps us gain insights into our network's performance, detect any anomalies or attack...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TruView?

Overall, I would rate TruView a nine out of ten. I would recommend it for mid-sized organizations, particularly those with fewer than two thousand people, as it offers flexible licensing without de...

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 43% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 31% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 27% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor vs TruView

Compared 100% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

August 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

July 2025

Download TruView product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Visual TruView by Fluke Networks is a unified solution for Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM). TruView embeds the most important data sources such as packet, transaction, NetFlow/IPFIX, and SNMP to present analytics in a time-correlated single dashboard view. These correlated views help you quickly see how well the infrastructure is transporting applications and how well those applications are performing in the context of end-user experience. And, TruView’s integrated 10 Gbps full line rate stream-to-disk packet capture ensures you’ll never miss an important event again.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. TruView

July 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.