CA Unified Communications Monitor vs InfluxDB comparison

Broadcom and InfluxData are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #87, while InfluxData is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to InfluxData’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfluxData users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

1,006 Views
704 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Read 17 InfluxDB reviews

3,443 Views
689 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

InfluxDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and InfluxDB are two products competing in the network monitoring and time-series database solutions space. In terms of versatility and broad feature set, InfluxDB appears to have an advantage, especially when focusing on data analytics and storage, making it worth its cost when compared to CA Unified Communications Monitor.

Features:CA Unified Communications Monitor offers real-time analysis, traffic flow visibility, and network performance diagnostics tailored for communication systems. InfluxDB provides high scalability, open-source flexibility, and efficient handling of time-series data, suitable for various applications beyond just monitoring.

Room for Improvement:CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve its flexibility in terms of integration options, scalability beyond communication systems, and support for cloud-based environments. InfluxDB might benefit from enhancing its user interface, reducing initial setup complexity, and expanding documentation for enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:CA Unified Communications Monitor is designed for specific infrastructures with dedicated support for communication networks. InfluxDB offers extensive deployment options, supporting cloud-based systems, and has broad community and enterprise support, ideal for flexible integration.

Pricing and ROI:CA Unified Communications Monitor aligns its pricing model with its specialized surveillance solutions, providing worthwhile ROI for applicable use cases. InfluxDB, despite higher setup costs, is seen as delivering substantial ROI through its extensive data handling and analytics capabilities, often deemed worth the investment for comprehensive analytical solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

87th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

67th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd)

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), NoSQL Databases (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
InfluxDB	0.3%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	99.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is we can use InfluxDB to integrate with and plug into any other tools."

"The user interface is well-designed and easy to use. It provides a clear overview of the data, making it simple to understand the information at hand."

"Based on InfluxDB, we have great analytics produced by our SRE team, and with that, we have an alerting and monitoring system in place."

"InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project."

"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."

"My advice for others looking into using InfluxDB is to use it the same way I did, because it is really stable, easy and friendly to use, and it is a great product overall."

"It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast."

More InfluxDB pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"Sometimes, when we write too much data within a minute, the data count becomes excessive, reaching perhaps 100,000 or 500,000 data points, and InfluxDB gives a timeout exception, which we must handle in our application."

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

"InfluxDB can improve by including new metrics on other technologies. They had some changes recently to pool data from endpoints but the functionality is not good enough in the industry."

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

"I've tried both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, and each has its limitations."

"The interface of InfluxDB is so complex and should be made easier for non-technical people."

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

More InfluxDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If it gets a little bit more into the metric side, then it would really be great, similar to Prometheus. However, Grafana handles those things together, so I do not feel that improvement is needed....

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

We are using InfluxDB with Prometheus and Grafana for monitoring the logs that are coming up as well as to create a powerful monitoring and analytics solution, encompassing data collection, metrics...

See all answers

Comparisons

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Prognosis Platform vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 15% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 10% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 9% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 8% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Ixia Hawkeye

February 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

January 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.

InfluxDB offers its users:

Infrastructure and application monitoring: Collect, process, and analyze real-time data from edge devices to help optimize distributed infrastructure.

IoT monitoring and analytics: InfluxDB is designed to store large volumes of time series data and quickly perform real-time analysis on that data. Gain insights from all the sensor data and use the collected data to create and perform automated tasks.

Network monitoring: Manage responsive and high-performing networks with widely distributed resources.

InfluxDB Benefits

There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

APIs and ready toolset: InfluxDB can be accessed via a set of powerful tools enabling users to get started quickly, with less programming required. This includes a REST API, extensive client libraries, a wide variety of open-source integrations, and Flux - a functional data scripting language for querying, analysis, and events. The InfluxDB API can be used to write data from edge devices to the InfluxDB instance

Time series engine: Get any data - events, logs, traces - from any edge device - systems, sensors, queues, databases, and networks. This data is stored in a powerful and high-performing engine capable of ingesting millions of data points per second.

Community: InfluxDB has a large community of cloud and open-source developers ready to assist users.

Ready-made templates: Use InfluxDB Templates, a set of tools with a packager and other ready monitoring solutions. These tools allow users to share their monitoring expertise with coworkers and other community members around the world. The Templates gallery offers available templates for some of the most popular tools and applications.

Enhanced UI: InfluxDB’s UI includes an explorer, dashboarding tools, and a script editor. Use it to easily browse the collected metric and event data and apply common transformations. The dashboarding tool comes with a variety of visualization options that help users view insights from the data. The script editor assists users to quickly master Flux with easily accessible examples, auto-completion, and real-time syntax checking.

Reviews from Real Users

InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.

Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”

InfluxData

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB

February 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. InfluxDB report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.