CA App Synthetic Monitor vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor comparison

Broadcom and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0, while SolarWinds is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.4. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

326 Views
323 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Read 42 SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor reviews

4,159 Views
2,994 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and CA App Synthetic Monitor compete in the server and application monitoring space. Based on the data comparisons, SolarWinds seems to have the upper hand due to comprehensive monitoring features and better customer service support.

Features: SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers extensive server and application monitoring, customizable dashboards, and detailed reporting features. CA App Synthetic Monitor focuses on synthetic transaction monitoring, providing insights on user experience and proactive issue detection.

Room for Improvement: SolarWinds could improve its alerting mechanisms and provide deeper integration options. Additional requested improvements include more user-friendly interfaces and enhanced cloud monitoring capabilities. CA App Synthetic Monitor users mention the need for more flexible reporting, better usability, and enhanced customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor has a straightforward deployment process with extensive support options praised by users. CA App Synthetic Monitor, though easy to set up, receives feedback on occasionally unresponsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers better pricing flexibility and perceived ROI, despite some concerns about initial setup costs. CA App Synthetic Monitor users feel the product justifies its cost due to its specialized features but mention it has a higher price point.

To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,077 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

47th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (11th), Active Directory Management (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is 1.5%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Carlos Camargo

Senior Operations Manager at Sencinet

Provides user-friendly API features and has straightforward deployment process

One product area that could benefit from improvement is the synchronization of licensing periods across different modules. The misalignment of licensing terms can present commercial challenges when adding new modules or additional pollers. Additionally, the granularity of polling times for specific components could be enhanced to better meet individual customers' needs without impacting the entire polling pool.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CA App Synthetic Monitor?

The product comes with expensive annual licenses. The product is very good, very reliable but it costs a lot. Barracuda offers the same kind of services at a lower price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CA App Synthetic Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CA App Synthetic Monitor?

If you are sending mail or browsing anything, you don't want to send your traffic without encryption. We use SSL for traffic encryption and ASM for SSL offloading. It is a proxy server for SSL. The...

See all answers

What do you like most about SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

Identifying the problem statement is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

The initial cost is quite high, but the renewal cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

There are no specific features or functionality I would like to see improved or enhanced in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor at this time. I have not encountered any missing features or fu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 100% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 19% of the time

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Prometheus Group vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

July 2025

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

June 2025

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor product report

Also Known As

CA ASM

SolarWinds SAM

Overview

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

Broadcom

SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor (SAM) delivers powerful application and server monitoring capabilities for IT pros, enabling them to diagnose and troubleshoot performance issues faster. Do not let slow applications and downtime impact your end-users and business services. Pinpoint the root cause of application issues across various layers of the IT stack. SolarWinds SAM is affordable and easy to deploy, use, and customize. You can automatically discover your system's environment and start monitoring in about an hour. No professional services or consultation needed.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Lexmark

Andr. L. Riis AS, NetSuite

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

July 2025

Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.