• Home
  • CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. OpenText Diagnostics

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
CA App Synthetic Monitor
Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews
405 views|264 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
OpenText Diagnostics
Read 4 OpenText Diagnostics reviews
580 views|392 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. OpenText Diagnostics
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA App Synthetic Monitor and OpenText Diagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. OpenText Diagnostics Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic
Ravi Suvvari
Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training
able to identify exact root cause
report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CA App Synthetic ...
Top Answer:The product comes with expensive annual licenses. The product is very good, very reliable but it costs a lot. Barracuda offers the same kind of services at a lower price.
What needs improvement with CA App Synthetic Monitor?
Top Answer:If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and… more »
What is your primary use case for CA App Synthetic Monitor?
Top Answer:If you are sending mail or browsing anything, you don't want to send your traffic without encryption. We use SSL for traffic encryption and ASM for SSL offloading. It is a proxy server for SSL. The… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
47th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
405
Comparisons
264
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
468
Rating
8.0
35th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
580
Comparisons
392
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
374
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA ASM
Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
Learn More
Broadcom
OpenText
Overview

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
Sample Customers
Lexmark
BSkyB, Alior Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company8%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. OpenText Diagnostics
May 2024
Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. OpenText Diagnostics
Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. OpenText Diagnostics and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA App Synthetic Monitor is ranked 47th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 3 reviews while OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 35th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. CA App Synthetic Monitor is rated 7.0, while OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CA App Synthetic Monitor writes "A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". CA App Synthetic Monitor is most compared with AppDynamics and Azure Monitor, whereas OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace and Accedian Skylight. See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. OpenText Diagnostics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.