BrowserStack vs TestProject comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BrowserStack Logo
8,712 views|6,797 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tricentis Logo
3,295 views|1,550 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and TestProject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"BrowserStack's best feature is browser testing across different platforms, including mobile.""Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable.""The main core concept behind this product is, it takes the overhead of maintaining all of your devices or particular computers. It continuously adds the latest devices that are coming into the market.""The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful.""Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development.""I like that it offers full device capability.""The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials.""The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."

More BrowserStack Pros →

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%.""Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge.""The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject.""The automation and AI are very good.""It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.""The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

More TestProject Pros →

Cons
"We are struggling to do local testing.""I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms.""We had some execution issues.""The solution is slow.""Occasionally, there are disruptions in the connection which can interfere with our testing processes, especially when testing on phones.""I would like to see clearer visibility.""BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico.""Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."

More BrowserStack Cons →

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it.""We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party.""TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management.""The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool.""In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available.""Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

More TestProject Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This solution costs less than competing products."
  • "The price is fine."
  • "There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."
  • "BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."
  • "The price of BrowserStack is high."
  • "Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."
  • "My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."
  • "As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."
  • More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is free."
  • "Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."
  • More TestProject Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:With respect to pricing, they are a bit expensive. I would rate the licensing model a six out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap. So, the price could be a bit decreased.
    Top Answer:The issue with the product stems from the fact that when we try to do a single or multiple login on multiple browsers for simulation in scenarios where users use Chrome, Mozilla, and Edge, all… more »
    Top Answer:The script-less part of it was good for novice users.
    Top Answer:The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool. They went commercial, and most of our work wasn't useful anymore. The support or the transition plans for people who were already using… more »
    Top Answer:We have a mobile app that we need to build regression testing packs, and we spent almost a year building quite a few test cases for automated testing on that mobile app so that they can run every day… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    6,797
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.9
    16th
    Views
    3,295
    Comparisons
    1,550
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    613
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    LambdaTest logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Sauce Labs logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Perfecto logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    CrossBrowserTesting logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Bitbar logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview
    BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

    TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
    IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company55%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Marketing Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization29%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise46%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BrowserStack is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while TestProject is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 6 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while TestProject is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestProject writes "An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget". BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, CrossBrowserTesting and Bitbar, whereas TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, Testim and SmartBear TestComplete.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.